Not anymore she divorced him recently. Then got caught and kicked out of a theater for dry humping her date during a live production of Beetlejuice. You know, a shining example of proper sexual conduct.
Yeah, it'd be a really long post to rehash all of the reasons this woman has zero business being a judge of character for sexual misconduct. It's akin to Trump's board of peace.
She's a terrible rep, she sounds like a tasteless, exhausting, stupid person, yet she does not stand accused of victimizing anyone the way, say, Swalwell is.
So her stance here may be what some would call "ironic," but I don't think its hypocritical.
Loudly and actively publicly defending heinous sex offenders doesn't necessarily make you one, but it certainly makes you a hypocrite for acting like you want to stop them.
“Go to church, find Jesus. Like, why is everybody so horny here?” Boebert said to reporters outside the Capitol on Thursday, April 16, before walking away.
While they're right to fight these issues, it's real hard not to comment on the lack of self awareness here.
GOP: "And btw, you are both too old to sexual assault anyways. So next time bring your daughters, or your daughter's daughter. And their friends. Or, you know, anyone really young!"
Swallwell has been around for quite a while. I actually liked the guy, I had no idea he was getting up to this kind of nonsense. He can just fuck off.
That's the difference between us and MAGA. We don't tolerate criminal activity, just because they're on our side. Replace him with someone we can trust. MAGA likes criminals in their ranks.
I propose every woman on capitol hill carry a 4 inch triangular knife. Any lawmakers with triangle shaped holes need a public flogging followed by prison, if they survive the unstitchable wound.
29 Comments
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 110 pts · 136d
The same Boebert that is currently married to the guy that publicly exposed himself to her when she was underaged?
Atom@lemmy.world · 101 pts · 136d
Not anymore she divorced him recently. Then got caught and kicked out of a theater for dry humping her date during a live production of Beetlejuice. You know, a shining example of proper sexual conduct.
drzoidberg@lemmy.world · 55 pts · 136d
She was dry jerking her date. She probably would have dry humped him if she didn't get caught jerking the dude off over his pants.
SatansMaggotyCumFart@piefed.world · 2 pts · 136d
I’d let the boebs do that to me she’s a gilf.
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 16 pts · 136d
Yeah, it'd be a really long post to rehash all of the reasons this woman has zero business being a judge of character for sexual misconduct. It's akin to Trump's board of peace.
NJSpradlin@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 136d
PunnyName@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 136d
Bored of Peace (I stole that from the Internet)
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 136d
And he was a DEMOCRAT, too!
TheGoldenV@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 136d
Well yeah. AOC is going to try to have them held accountable and Bigot Barbie is going to just hold them. You know, good cop bad cop.
WesternInfidels@feddit.online · 13 pts · 136d
She's a terrible rep, she sounds like a tasteless, exhausting, stupid person, yet she does not stand accused of victimizing anyone the way, say, Swalwell is.
So her stance here may be what some would call "ironic," but I don't think its hypocritical.
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 136d
Loudly and actively publicly defending heinous sex offenders doesn't necessarily make you one, but it certainly makes you a hypocrite for acting like you want to stop them.
Malyca@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 135d
That's not even half of the worst of it
pticrix@lemmy.ca · 44 pts · 136d
While they're right to fight these issues, it's real hard not to comment on the lack of self awareness here.
resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe · 20 pts · 136d
“Here” meaning the Beetlejuice! Musical?
pticrix@lemmy.ca · 12 pts · 136d
Indeed, that is the event I was thinking of! Have a cookie 🍪
TheTechnician27@lemmy.world · 44 pts · 136d
Non-AMP URL: https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/4/16/aoc-boebert-join-calls-for-sexual-misconduct-accountability-in-congress
Rolder@reddthat.com · 21 pts · 136d
Broken clock is right twice a day I suppose
betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 136d
GOP: We're in!
GOP: We're out!
D_C@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 135d
GOP: "And btw, you are both too old to sexual assault anyways. So next time bring your daughters, or your daughter's daughter. And their friends. Or, you know, anyone really young!"
BigMacHole@thelemmy.club · 20 pts · 136d
Good! The LAST thing we need is
Members of Congress giving people Handjobs in Public!Stuff!-Lauren Boebert!
dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net · 17 pts · 136d
Wow, the proverb was right: politics do make strange bedfellows.
Bieren@lemmy.today · 11 pts · 136d
They could start in the White House and go down from there
CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 136d
I thought we just had some? Swalwell was gone in less than one Scarumucci.
How about some for the White House?
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 136d
Swallwell has been around for quite a while. I actually liked the guy, I had no idea he was getting up to this kind of nonsense. He can just fuck off.
That's the difference between us and MAGA. We don't tolerate criminal activity, just because they're on our side. Replace him with someone we can trust. MAGA likes criminals in their ranks.
expatriado@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 136d
inb4 horseshoe theorists
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 136d
They can fuck right off to James Carville's octogenarian asshole where they belong.
devolution@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 136d
The conservative about face only when it affects them directly is exhausting.
AOC should do this with you extreme caution.
_lilith@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 136d
sploosh@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 135d
I propose every woman on capitol hill carry a 4 inch triangular knife. Any lawmakers with triangle shaped holes need a public flogging followed by prison, if they survive the unstitchable wound.
homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 136d
No! Nothing is allowed to be done by those who aren't 100% PURE
PunnyName@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 136d
Are you advocating for sexual predators?