cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/38690289
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/waas
::: spoiler Alt text Have I mentioned SMBC's ad-free patreon page? :::
::: spoiler Bonus panel
:::
WaaS (2026-04-22)
cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/38690289
http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/waas
::: spoiler Alt text Have I mentioned SMBC's ad-free patreon page? :::
::: spoiler Bonus panel
24 Comments
Illogicalbit@lemmy.world · 31 pts · 135d
Being married, I know it’s a death trap… but f@&$ it. What does premium wife get me?
rockerface@lemmy.cafe · 49 pts · 135d
Pegging
fartographer@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 135d
Oh no... None for me, thank you.
baltakatei@sopuli.xyz · 16 pts · 135d
WifeCoin
napkin2020@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 135d
Higher access to vagina
Access to new and improved body parts
Unlimited access to conversation*
* Restrictions per Terms and Services apply
Skullgrid@lemmy.world · -10 pts · 135d
My guy if you want higher access into the vagina, that's on you, grow a longer dick
That comes as part of the base plan. "Access to limiting conversation" would be the subscription bonus
molten_boron@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 135d
Haha wife bad
Skullgrid@lemmy.world · -4 pts · 135d
Are you married? Do you understand the compromises and social management that goes into making a marriage with kids work?
molten_boron@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 135d
Happily married for 10 years, thanks for asking!
Skullgrid@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 135d
OK, so you do understand that sometimes one ends up being in an emotionally support role by default, leading to many conversations where you're assisting the person and sometimes it gets draining. Which is why "unlimited conversation" wouldn't be in the higher tier, since it doesn't specify the nature of the conversation.
Also, I tried to call it out, because there was a thread where some asshole was trying to imply you should feed babies and toddlers (0-3 year olds) vegan diets, they had nothing to do with having their own kids.
https://lemmy.world/post/41808560/21667181
Strider@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 135d
10% less complaints 1 random compliment per year Access to extra premium
SacralPlexus@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 135d
You left out the bonus panel!
Doomsider@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 135d
Where is the NSFL wife?
Mothra@mander.xyz · 19 pts · 135d
Get an ad blocker
helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 135d
Set your child to highly destructive mode to wreck those signs.
tacosanonymous@mander.xyz · 15 pts · 135d
How mad is she going to be if I click on that top link?
tal@lemmy.today · 10 pts · 135d
Given that there are fixed costs associated setting up a WaaS setup that would be inefficient to do on a case-by-case basis, this seems like a prime opportunity for franchising.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 135d
I think you just explained tradwives.
MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 135d
Honestly, this exact scenario playing out with AI lovers of both anatomies and getting bad-enough that people decide learning to understand and put up with eachother's non-sense is the better option ... is the best chance our species has in this and future generations.
Otoh, we all know its mostly men, and this represents maybe a bottleneck we need to weed-out the ones that will never get the lesson. Here's hoping there's enough genetics in it at-play to actually eliminate a substantnal amount of the right(very specific levels/attributes of NP, gullibility and psychopathy) things, and not pointlessly cost our species a bunch of genetic diversity that could otherwise hang-around.
If that second paragraph seems harsh/eugenic, understand its the only potential possitive I see along this path, and almost certainly accidental if it works-out that way in the end at all. I believe anyone trying to make such happen on-purpose is insane and a bad person, promise.
More likely, our grand-kids will all be fucking robots until they die, and "their" kids won't be so-much theirs as clones/test-tube-babies the robots raise, should they for some absurd reason deign to keep flesh-bags around at all.
limelight79@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 135d
Futurama was right: DON'T DATE ROBOTS!
Erusset@slrpnk.net · 1 pts · 135d
Where is our 1950's style educational PSA?
MousePotatoDoesStuff@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 135d
Doesn't even have to be genetic, could be a matter of nurture as well (yes, I am well aware that this is not guaranteed either).
As for the robots scenario, I'd imagine the robots would be programmed/trained/prompted to act like Stepford spouses or something, so perhaps they'd keep the children around purely because that's what they do.
socsa@piefed.social · 5 pts · 135d
Which tier includes pegging?
merde@sh.itjust.works · -3 pts · 135d
comments should be disabled under this one