I do however think that it’s germaphobic to allow that to cause you not to get a cat despite proclaiming to want one, like the commenter I was replying to.
yeah not defending that person, not a take I get myself...
I don't think it's germophobic to want the cat, who stands in his litter box (which gets scooped every day and replaced twice a week) fulla pee clumps and turds, to stay off the counters and especially food.
I accept my dogs and cats - any pets - are going to be expanding my exposure, shit I give them raspberries and kisses... but not the cat's toes lol.
see: charter schools strangling the public school budgets, so the chuds can turn around and say "look at how bad our schools are doing!", rinse & repeat
it's telling that AI's biggest proponents are chuds and assholes.
I know that's not 100% of the ai lovers out there, but goddamn, when you find yourself in the company of Trump, it would make me question what the hell I was thinking.
I generally don't think about it, but there have been people mass downvoted in every thread by the same people, which seems like a coordinated move to push those comments down - that's basically censoring.
how fucking dumb are you that you think there wasn't a mathematician involved in solving one of math's greatest challenges?
"Mathematicians Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge spent about a year studying a related version of the Navier-Stokes equations with the assistance of AI. Their work showed that a solution in the friction-free version of the equations can develop a singularity in finite time, a result often described as mathematical "blow-up"."
furthermore, OpenAI's solution is almost certainly built upon this work.
"The most consequential part of OpenAI's Navier-Stokes claim remains unverified. If its model has genuinely produced a valid proof of the full problem, it could represent an extraordinary moment for both mathematics and AI. But until the proof is made available for scrutiny, questions over its origins are likely to remain just as important as the claimed breakthrough itself."
OpenAI can end the discussion by making the proof available but hasn't.
yeah not defending that person, not a take I get myself...
lol plural, when the doorbell rings all the dogs go into meat mlrs mode
The woman on the left, simply stating, again, I TOLD YOU
yeah the trick is faking your death so convincingly that you can escape
meat missile
south korea fan death strikes again?
I don't think it's germophobic to want the cat, who stands in his litter box (which gets scooped every day and replaced twice a week) fulla pee clumps and turds, to stay off the counters and especially food.
I accept my dogs and cats - any pets - are going to be expanding my exposure, shit I give them raspberries and kisses... but not the cat's toes lol.
I love my cat but the idea of it walking in my food... man, I see what those toe beans do in the litter box, I do not want that around food.
blech
yep. same thing with homophobes, many of them are obsessed with homoeroticism. and a lot of racists are obsessed with race play.
0.o
see: charter schools strangling the public school budgets, so the chuds can turn around and say "look at how bad our schools are doing!", rinse & repeat
yeah given these 4....
it's telling that AI's biggest proponents are chuds and assholes.
I know that's not 100% of the ai lovers out there, but goddamn, when you find yourself in the company of Trump, it would make me question what the hell I was thinking.
I generally don't think about it, but there have been people mass downvoted in every thread by the same people, which seems like a coordinated move to push those comments down - that's basically censoring.
llms are roided up chatbots. calling them AI is an insult to actual AI.
it's like your face mate, it can't be helped.
you'll find ai slop fans in every thread arguing that LLMs are the future and we're all dumb dumbs for not hopping on nvidia's dick
good
nice, keep adding to the problem killing the planet.
how fucking dumb are you that you think there wasn't a mathematician involved in solving one of math's greatest challenges?
"Mathematicians Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge spent about a year studying a related version of the Navier-Stokes equations with the assistance of AI. Their work showed that a solution in the friction-free version of the equations can develop a singularity in finite time, a result often described as mathematical "blow-up"."
https://www.firstpost.com/tech/has-openai-model-solved-80-year-old-navier-stokes-problem-mathematician-raises-questions-14044080.html
furthermore, OpenAI's solution is almost certainly built upon this work.
"The most consequential part of OpenAI's Navier-Stokes claim remains unverified. If its model has genuinely produced a valid proof of the full problem, it could represent an extraordinary moment for both mathematics and AI. But until the proof is made available for scrutiny, questions over its origins are likely to remain just as important as the claimed breakthrough itself."
OpenAI can end the discussion by making the proof available but hasn't.
and I'll add:
it's increased my bill by ~$48 a month, give or take a few bucks either way.
for that, I've stopped gassing up completely, so I'm saving at least $150+ a month on fuel, probably more considering gas has gotten more expensive.