Waymo says expecting driverless taxis to stay out of bike lanes is unrealistic
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
https://road.cc/news/driverless-taxis-veering-into-cycle-lanes-normal-practice-says-waymo
19 Comments
DarkCloud@lemmy.world · 40 pts · 109d
If Waymo doesn't respect the Social Contract like this, they shouldn't expect it to be available to them. It should be open season on Waymo sabotage/destruction. Human lives are more valuable that Waymo.
bishoponarope@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 108d
It doesn't take much to weld nails into tire annihilators and fill a bag with them. Can't drive in a cycle lane without functioning wheels.
9point6@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 109d
Then it should be unrealistic to expect they are allowed to operate, frankly
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 21 pts · 109d
I guess bicyclists not carrying sawed off shot guns to shoot at robot murder cars is also unrealistic.
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 10 pts · 109d
😅
This is in Europe mate. London to be precise. Not the US. People don't casually carry guns around here.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 15 pts · 108d
Things can change.
Didn't used to be robot murder cars on the road either.
Maybe crossbows, aim at the tires? Sorry: tyres.
Maybe some kind of light that is extremely bright in a particular wavelength, that blinds their cameras and sends them into an emergency halt mode?
But anyway lol, sawed off shotguns are extremely illegal in all the US as well... I guess the analogy was lost in translation =P
wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 108d
High powered lasers that can burn a hole in the sensor aren't too hard to get ahold of. A sticker slapped over one could probably work just as well though, and there's more plausible deniability.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 108d
... I was thinking more like an IR/UV floodlight, than a laser.
Less chance of accidentally blinding someone.
Granted, you'd have to figure out a frequency range that would be 'super effective' against particular cameras, but... I would feel bad about accidentally giving someone a non consensual amateur lasik surgery.
massive_bereavement@fedia.io · 6 pts · 108d
Maybe a spray paint can to show them manners.
RamenJunkie@midwest.social · 7 pts · 108d
Caltrops
DisgruntledGorillaGang@reddthat.com · 20 pts · 108d
If they can't follow the law then why the fuck would they be allowed on the road?
dvoraqs@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 108d
Same for humans
DGen@piefed.zip · 17 pts · 108d
Maybe.. driverless vehicle are unrealistic then?
RePsyche@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 109d
I guess we just have to expect to be killed by Waymo. /s
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 108d
We were promised these things would be better, and safer than human drivers. Now, even with the assistance of remote human drivers, they can't follow the law?
No, you don't get to move the goal posts and say we should still accept them because they don't drive any worse than humans. If that's the new standard then what the fuck do we need these things for? What is their purpose, but to take jobs?
jet@hackertalks.com · 8 pts · 108d
vratajin@piefed.social · 6 pts · 108d
The article is a steaming pile of garbage. I was ready to hate on Waymo, but the article is conflating what happened in the US with whatever might or might not happen in the UK.
It's pretty obvious the AVs need to observe the traffic rules, otherwise they will be fined into oblivion and have their licence revoked. The click bait worked.
ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca · 2 pts · 108d
In the provided preview picture, isn't that Abbey road where the Beatles took their famous album cover picture where they cross the street?
It absolutely is!
MrSulu@lemmy.ml · 2 pts · 108d
Waymo now fucked across most continents. Shoots self in both feet.