The Moto 360 came out 9 years ago and set the standard for Wear OS devices today

https://www.xda-developers.com/moto-360-9-years-set-standard-wear-os-devices/

115 points · 17 comments · view on lemmy.world

17 Comments

Pxtl@lemmy.ca · 30 pts · 2y

has it really already been 9 years i still think of smartwatches as new tech oh god i'm gonna die soon

WrittenWeird@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 2y
[ removed ]
qwertyqwertyqwerty@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 2y

I bought the LG G Watch when it was on sale for $80 with a free $50 Google Play gift card. I was worth that price, but, WearOS 2 declared watches without buttons dead, only a few months after I bought my first smartwatch. Google has an enormous history of killing off products, and while I know Android will have a solution to wearables, I don't see Google supporting WearOS permanently.

aubertlone@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 2y (2 replies)

Had one of these.

Sadly misplaced it after about 3 years of use.

ijeff@lemdro.id · 3 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Mine sadly stopped working altogether well before that :(.

MermaidsGarden@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y

I think mine made it about 2 years before the back plate started cracking. Then the screen gave out

zeekaran@sopuli.xyz · 6 pts · 2y (1 reply)

I miss the no bezel screen, despite the flat tire. Unfortunately I burned through three of these in a short amount of time from the cheap plastic back, and the battery was absolutely terrible.

shitescalates@midwest.social · 7 pts · 2y

Yeah that whole "flat tire" thing was so blown out of proportion. It looks better than any of the current watches with their huge bezels. I swear someone paid off reviewers to pan Motorola's products. The moto X got a bunch of unfair BS too.

menturi@lemdro.id · 5 pts · 2y (2 replies)

The Moto 360 just looks amazing. How come no smart watches are like that today?

Polar@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 2y

Because everyone complained about the flat tire.

9point6@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2y

The fossil watches were spiritual successors to the Moto 360 series, IMO.

The pixel watch is a cut above all of them now though IMO, despite looking less like a traditional watch at a glance

madcaesar@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 2y

9 years and smartwatch are still pretty pedestrian.

From buggy software, to shitty battery life, to too expensive.

reallyzen@unilem.org · 3 pts · 2y (3 replies)

The F with websites that doesn't allow my DNS, my VPN, and my adblocker. My browser, my rules - your website and business plan, your choice. My private data.

Moonrise2473@feddit.it · 2 pts · 2y (2 replies)

i accessed it with a very dodgy vpn (ivacy, which is blocked by a ton of websites for abuse) +privacy badger and it did not block me

reallyzen@unilem.org · 1 pts · 2y (1 reply)

Thanks for the info. I'm a bit on the classic side, on mobile, with adguard DNS, proton VPN and Firefox Focus.

limerod@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 2y

Use Firefox with ublock origin instead of Firefox focus. It should not be blocked.

steltek@lemm.ee · 2 pts · 2y

Pebble Time Steel should have been the "standard". Maybe I'm the wrong audience but the Moto 360 is a big miss for me. A smart watch for me needs to have:

  • Always on, sunlight readable display
  • "3 day weekend" battery life
  • Basic smarts only: notifications, alerts, calendar
  • Durable, waterproof
  • Compact size
  • Fitness tracking

I don't care too much about "premium materials" once some basic durability is satisfied. I don't have an opinion about round vs square.

Draghetta@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 2y

The clock seems off by about 85 years, I bet the Czechs must be worried