I made a post on hierarchy a month ago but I have some more specific questions now.
I've been hit with the claim that mass production industries that are needed today would not be possible without a hierarchy. That due to regional limitations and the logistics of smartphone manufacturing, technology cannot be produced on the needed scale without a hierarchy of managers.
This is quoted in PCB fabrication, as well as other areas such as medicine and other mass produced goods.
It is also said that managers are needed for efficiency, though I don't understand that.
Because the anarchist movement, abolishing hierarchy, "runs counter" to the "global direction of humanity and progress", it is acclaimed to being "doomed to failure" and "idealist".
What would be the anarchist response to this? Would appreciate detailed responses and/or resources.
I want to improve my anarchist understanding
59 Comments
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 23 pts · 123d
Could I direct you to !anarchism@lemmy.dbzer0.com? Thos community is probably better suited for a discussion, as !flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com is mainly a meme community.
Whoever said that never worked in a corporate job lol. Also David Graeber made a good argument for why manager (as in hierarchical decicionmakers, not as in sorting out logistics) are a bullshit job. But who even cares about efficiency more than about human suffering? Capitalists do, anarchists don't.
rockerface@lemmy.cafe · 5 pts · 123d
Saw a take that "billionaires are needed to stimulate the economy" a few days ago. The funniest part is they specifically meant Chinese "socialism" when writing that.
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 4 pts · 123d
Lmao. If there is some useful function that billionaires do, then you should be able to emulate it in a democratically controlled way without enriching individuals.
rockerface@lemmy.cafe · 4 pts · 122d
Which was my point in response, yeah. There's nothing of value they provide that can't be done without creating a massive wealth inequality.
ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 121d
Oh so we all need to be pedophiles in an anarchist society? Thanks. Thanks so much.
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 123d
Ah I figured that community wasn't as active as flippanarchy, but alright.
That appears to be a whole book, perhaps I can give it a read sometime
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 122d
I tried to link the relevant paragraph, maybe your brwose doesnt take you there correctly. Its under the section "5. what taskmasters do" of the second chapter.
Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 122d
Yes, anything from Greaber is absolutely eye-opening.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 122d
Worker's cooperatives can and do run factories lol
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 122d
Globally? As in beyond just local-level set ups. Cause they need to be able to do the international logistics to compile all the respective pieces of computers, or smn.
captainlezbian@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 122d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation
A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 122d
holy shit. thats a huge cooperative.
ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 121d
It's well known that people cannot collaborate long distance without coercive violent threats. I'll fucking kill you if you disagree.
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 9 pts · 123d
Just because some people cannot image alternative pathways to reach a goal, it doesnt mean its impossible. But I would agree that current global production lines are incompatible with anarchism, as they use local / regional circunstances to maximize their exploitation through ressource extraction, low wages, lower safety regulations etc.
Managers, CEOs, states, colonialism, patriarchy and more hierarchical institutions are needed to protect this exploitation, to justify it and to further it through violence.
I dont really care about the ability to produce billions of smartphones yearly and I am sure a reduction of PCB production would be manageable for an anarchist society. But medicine should be way more accessible globally, so I think anarchists should have some answers ready. One I can think of is the end of medicine patents. Other answers were mentioned in this Lemmy thread Medicine production in an anarchist society
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 123d
Yeah, we all need to remember that every smartphone, every cup of coffee is an exported exploitation pain and suffering. That we all partake in this mess routinely.
And I agree completely that anarchistic societies should not really attempt to replicate things that capitalism is capable of. Sure PCBs and chips could be scavenged and repurposed - something hierarchical system is TOTALLY incapable of, it being economically nonviable. Medicine production is whole another thing, local chemists could totally cater to all the finest needs in local community if only they wouldn't be busted by SWAT on day 1 like some drug making labs (which IMO should also be totally accepted in society so long as they don't turn into another capitalist abomination of control and pointless accumulation/exploitation). I feel this pain, being a chemist, so many opportunities to make our world a better place just made impossible by violence.
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 123d
Being able to make enough mobiles for everyone around the world would be significant if we are trying to go for implementing an anarchist model of society globally (or it's just not viable).
I'll check out the link.
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 122d
There are probably already enough smart phones in existense for every person on the planet. And I really dont think snartphones are a necessary component of enabling anarchism, but its also not really anything bad to have them, IF we can source them and their parts without further hurting the earth via extraction. I think the current style of yearly new models and the goal of rapid improvement of capabilities is something that an anarchist society would question and probably end.
A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 122d
The chips themselves would suffice. Check out collapse OS.
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 122d
That implies people would be content living under a system that didn't allow them to get a phone, when modern everyday work and life have become inextricably digitized to a significant extent.
Though I agree in that we don't need new models every year lol.
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 122d
I think there probably reasonable and non violent ways to get everyone pretty decent smartphones, its just not something I would prioritize. An anarchist society spanning the whole globe might disagree with me of course and I wont object in that case, as long as we dont keep up current destructive practices.
A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 122d
Horizontal hierarchies are better at handling complexity than vertical hierarchies.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 121d
Call me old school maybe, but I'm a fan of Anarcho Syndicalism:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation
Personally, I think that the idea of 'abolish all hierarchy' is rather silly.
Instead, question and critique all hierarchy, and then use what you learn from that to design the most equitable system possible.
Mondragon is not perfect, but I would argue it is (at least in the west) the most well known functional antithesis to capitalist private ownership that actually literally works and produces complex things.
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 121d
What form(s) of hierarchy do you believe is necessary or helpful, and why?
Can you introduce me to Anarcho syndicalism?
Thanks for the mondragon example and quotations, I've saved this for future reference.
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 121d
If I could tell you plainly what specific forms of hierarchy are and are not acceptable, a consistent and coherent ruleset that 100% accurately defines that, I'd have essentially created a grand unified theory of anarchism.
I am not that smart.
I would argue that part of the entire idea of anarchism is that no one is, that people and groups will always have differences, even if they broadly agree on general principles.
Generally speaking, I would say start with the idea of 'a system is to be judged by what it does or produces, not what it claims to do or produce.'
Apply that principle to everything, every social construct, every machine, every bias or norm, every political system, every monetary or financial system, every mode of production.
There will commonalities in many of these subsets, but many of them will also have unique elements thay require at least some level of specialized knowledge or serious study to well comprehend.
As to anarcho-syndicalism, well I mean wikipedia is a decent starting point ->
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarcho-syndicalism
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 123d
PCB fabrication exists because hierarchical systems can't assemble electronics without PCBs.
Making a PCB in a small chaotic team (or even alone, damn, who in hw didn't etch their own PCBs as a kid?) is totally possible and quite easy; now making them to tight specs to make them compatible with a vertical manufacturing giant is incredibly hard (yet doable).
I was running an anarchic hardware design and manufacturing shop until last year (now I just have a bunch of unused equipment at home; can't come up with ideas on what to do). The problem wasn't in production, the problem was in sales - monopolist shops took over whole distribution networks and won't let an outsider in without getting their cut.
What would you need electronics devices for, anyway? Other than run Android that's designed to be ridiculously complex and uniform, alienating system with a sprawl of flaws and horrible centralization; catering hardware for smartphone industry is exactly hard because of hierarchical system in existence. Sure, there is an ecosystem of apps... that get rewritten on a monthly basis, cloned and vibecoded in minutes. And operating system vulnerabilities get scaled worldwide in an instant as everyone has exact same system.
I'd say, we'd have way more beauty in the world and way more security if our hardware was not unified. And for that we'd need to get rid of hierarchical optimizations. Which is not going to happen... on a global scale, that is, I'm soldering my nonsence equipment in a non-standard way now and do not care.
Here is a customary link to my friend working without a PCB at all https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xo8qckXgNNw I just love rewatching this sick video.
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 123d
But even if you're running a local system of apps and hardware, you still need to be able to manufacture the parts needed for said electronic devices.
I didn't think PCB was something people could make themselves, that is cool.
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 122d
Manufacture or scavenge or trade. There were initiatives to build local chips, too, those just fail because existing fabs are just too good; also because when you really need a job done, you often do not even need any electronics. One common place where we all rely on it inevitably is access to this internet - which it pretty much a manifestation of capitalist unifying action; totally expected to require us to comply somehow, also totally avoidable, if we choose to (although autonomous zones are better off not ignoring stuff just randomly).
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 122d
Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you in favour of abolishing the internet?
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz · 2 pts · 122d
No I'm not. It's just important to be able to do a personal action if you choose to IMO.
A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 122d
Also check out mechanical computing while you are at it.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 123d
Where are you based? I'm thinking of getting into some board fab myself, if not farming it out somewhere local for quick prototyping.
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 123d
Savo, Finland.
I've recently seen a really neat idea - order 2layer board full of vias grid (like, some thousands of these boards), then endmill them (CNC in original idea, but I see nothing a steady hand with dremel couldn't do) into paths and get instant quite high complexity 2layer PCB for prototyping. Still less versatile than spaghetti wirebonding and less prod-grade than actually etching/plating yourself, but quite convenient for some setups. Haven't tried it myself.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 122d
Very interesting idea. Unfortunately I'm looking for higher tolerance than can be accomplished by hand.
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 122d
Depends on your hand. Also there are some crafting paper cutters with CNC that are ridiculously cheap and ridiculously accurate; people did sub-mm MCU leads with them as stencil paste mask; surely one can do etch resist through those. I never owned one though.
This is no good for BGA, those probably would need some photolithography; totally doable too
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 122d
Yeah I'm talking 5-mil traces
alzymologist@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 122d
well, I used to routinely scratch 50 micron Pd pads on graphene transistors with W needle through vacuum chamber door, by hand (operating mechanical connector arm), when original litho-printed pads were coming out damaged. I'm certain that's doable.
commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 122d
Centralized, efficient mass production of goods to satisfy human needs does require some hierarchy, but under a society that has successfully abolished commodity production in favor of production for use these hierarchies would operate in a completely different way than they do now - not being born out of class antagonisms but rather out of necessity for coordination, never permanent but revocable and based on competency.
A project or a large production chain might have engineers, organizers - basically, whatever is necessary for the division of labor and for the end product to come into fruition. After all, how are you going to manufacture something like a phone without dividing up necessary tasks, having someone directing the production chain (which often consists of 1000+ people btw)?
Kropotkin and his anarcho-communism theory (which is the most developed anarchist theory afaik) does propose a solution as seen in the works such as "Fields, Factories, and Workshops" where the argument is essentially 'centralized production requires hierarchy, therefore we must have small localized production', or in other words, throw away hundreds of years of progress and return to medieval style-esque production which would greatly increase the total amount of work hours needed to produce goods to satisfy needs (assuming all the needed materials get supplied without issues), all for the sake of ideology and ghosts within the mind.
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 122d
I would like to reply to this specific part with an quote and an link from the anarchist FAQ. Feel free to follow the link, there is so much more detail an perspective in the parts I left out of the quote.
Link to the relevant part of the anarchist FAQ
libre_warrior@lemmy.ml · 3 pts · 122d
If we want to keep over-production, then we need hierarchy, but we don't actually need over-production.
::: spoiler Definition of letten When the surroundings let something happen.
The myth of [demand] sais that the reason there is over production is because the consumers demand it. However, most of this demand is artificial. We don't need to travel with plains, we don't need high resolution television, we don't need video games, we don't need cars, we don't need meat every day. This artificial demand comes from the normalization of these through advertisements and lettening.
By moving towards horizontality through democratic confederalism for instance, our needs are drastically reduced because we operate from the idea; Each according to their ability, each according to their need.
Managers are not needed because we can replace them with elected and withdrawable coordinators.
"Anarchism runs counter to the global direction of humainty and progress."
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 122d
Isn't that suggesting abolishing the internet and technology? Like primitivism, going back to pre-technological times.
People have jobs far away they need cars for transport to access and entertainment is considered a need, though it doesn't need to be in 4k lol.
libre_warrior@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 122d
The reason we "need" cars for jobs is because we made society with cars in mind. We might as well transform society into having people in mind. Also, jobs is a consequence of capitalism, so we can transform that into people having responsibilities.
People was able to entertain themselves before mass media, it was just different. A characteristics was that they relied on their imagination to a much larger degree.
youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 3 pts · 122d
Anarcho-syndicalism is of course not a real thing
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 122d
What's that?
I'm new to anarchism.
youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 4 pts · 122d
Tldr unions get real big and do more and more and knit together more and more with less and less use for money and stuff until there's literally no more excuse for the bosses and governments or close enough as to make no difference it was way more plausible a century ago when unions ran things like social clubs and hospitals even in anti labor places like the united States but it took a pretty big hit when the shitlibs blockades Spain except German and itallian weapons during the civil war
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 121d
Yeah, anarcho syndicalism was so threatening as a concept that both the Nazis and Stalinists tried very hard to kill it, the first from without and the second from within.
youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 1 pts · 121d
I'm willing to kind of give the stalinists a pass here they just didn't know how to help without being dicks no way they did more damage than the fucking piece of shit libs who said only Nazis can go in and out
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 121d
You must not know about the level of infighting and shit flinging they did, and still perpetuate, to this day, labelling anyone who didn't fully support Stalinism as a Trotskyist and traitor to communism.
There are very, very good historical reasons for why Anarchists are weary of 'Marxist-Leninists'.
Nearly everytime they've tried to cooperate against capitalism, the Leninists or Stalinists then betray and or kill all of the Anarchists or others who weren't fully aligned with them.
youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 1 pts · 121d
I'm not defending them I'm just saying you can't really talk shit to them in this instance while the war was ongoing and not since without mentioning the global libs yes they do tend to be backstabby I'm well aware
sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 120d
... I can talk all the shit I want.
'Allies' who backstab you and try to kill you after they appoint themselves as the leaders of the movement that you started in your own country... are not great allies.
lurch@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 122d
If the workers are motivated, they can self-organize. However, a hierachy in a production facility or across multiple is not incompatible with anarchy on a national scale. There can be different kind of jobs. There can be someone who just organizes logistics, replacing the manager.
All of this has nothing to do with political systems like anarchism or oligarchy tho. People like to mix them up, but these are economic systems; in this case even microeconomic.
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 122d
I thought anarchism was against hierarchy? Like isn't that the point of anarchism?
How does a person who organizes logistics differ from a manager?
Please elaborate.
punkisundead@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 120d
Relevant answer in the Anarchist FAQ
youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 2 pts · 122d
The thing about extreme high frequency x ray lithography is that its literally black magic and the machines literally do not work if the operators don't wish they were somewhere else its that suffering that longing for elsewhere that escape that allows the light to get small enough to cut 4nm MOSFETs and operators' consciousness to leak through the pneuma into the chips that's why computers actually have at least the fractional residue of souls and electrical engineers are all soulless husks its also why all the Asian chip fabs need suicide nets to keep workers because their souls are literally being stolen and they know it and why the big american chip fab is in phoenix az so you can't tell
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 122d
I get this is satire but like idk something about global logistics of moving parts across countries being needed for manufacturing computers. Honestly I guess it's difficult to understand if I have no clue how computers are made to begin with.
youcantreadthis@quokk.au · 2 pts · 122d
It was made that way for the capitalism it can all be put in the same very very large building that's kind of what shenzhen is anarchists can and do do global logistics its just usually smuggling because States hate us so you don't hear about it in detail and we tend to prefer because shipping isn't free and people should be able but not have to rely on each other if they don't want to what I outlined there is only like half as stupid as claim in OP that authoritarianism is necessary
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 109d
mr john electronics here, pcbs are dirt cheap and mass production doesnt need a hierarchy at all
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 109d
What makes you say that?
IAMgROOT@lemmy.wtf · 1 pts · 109d
its just a nonconductive board with copper lines, holes and mount pads