Neo-Nazi group challenges hate ban by arguing law ‘operates as a doorway to tyranny’
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2026/may/18/neo-nazi-group-national-socialist-network-white-australia-challenges-hate-ban-ntwnfb
29 points · 12 comments · view on lemmy.world
12 Comments
nbsp@programming.dev · 20 pts · 96d
trying to dictate who we fuck
complains about tyranny
behold the master race
Kolanaki@pawb.social · 10 pts · 96d
"Tyanny for thee, not for me."
T00l_shed@lemmy.world · 18 pts · 96d
Nazis don't have a place at the bar
LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 96d
This is just advertising for them. Why even report on this.
eureka@aussie.zone · 7 pts · 96d
This.
Share it where needed: https://thewhiterosesociety.writeas.com/9-principles-for-journalists-reporting-on-neo-nazis
See also: https://aussie.zone/post/32699745
arbilp3@aussie.zone · 3 pts · 96d
Those who put together the principles for journalists document are really worthy of respect. Thank you for sharing.
LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 94d
Thanks!
Ozzy@piefeed.com · 4 pts · 96d
I can’t see them winning, sounds absurd prospect.
If they did it be major trouble and possible referendum
finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 96d
From 2025, but it seems his lawyer isn't without controversy of his own ...
SaneMartigan@aussie.zone · 3 pts · 96d
::: spoiler Thragg looking motherfucker
:::
Paradox of Tolerance. The Intolerant aren't owed the tolerance of a civil society. You can't break as well as quote the social contract.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe · 2 pts · 96d
We're eventually going to have to do the same thing to MAGA in America. Don't ban them for hate speech, ban them for being a National Security Threat. That sticks, and doesn't violate free speech laws. You wouldn't let ISIS operate freely, would you?
Seagoon_@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 94d
The law at minimum stops chaos.
and maybe these nazis should think of their duty as citizens to make this a better place rather than spreading hate and whining about their freedumbs