Blue Origin rocket New Glenn explosion during a test at Kennedy Space Center in Cocoa Beach, FL. 28.05.26

https://files.catbox.moe/jmc3ok.mp4

97 points · 26 comments · view on lemmy.world

26 Comments

SenatorCollins@aussie.zone · 24 pts · 83d (3 replies)

Yeah, that’s not very typical. I’d like to make that point.

joshcodes@programming.dev · 15 pts · 83d (1 reply)

The footage is mostly clear until the end where it's much harder to see, but I think it's safe to say the front fell off.

Thassodar@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 83d

What changes do you suppose they'll make in the next version?

djdarren@piefed.social · 3 pts · 83d

How do you propose they'll tow this out of the environment?

MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca · 21 pts · 83d (2 replies)

Rapid Unexpected Disassembly?

gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org · 3 pts · 83d (1 reply)

rude

hexdream@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 83d

Rapid Unexpected Disassmbly: Expensive.. so Rude is correct...

hperrin@lemmy.ca · 18 pts · 83d (5 replies)

We should privatize the space industry even more!!! What could possibly continue to go wrong?

protist@retrofed.com · 11 pts · 83d (2 replies)

I'm in no way supportive of privatizing spaceflight, but this ignores the reality of the many, many catastrophic explosions that have occurred among publicly funded rocketry programs. Turns out strapping a capsule to a giant bomb and trying to control it while it explodes is pretty dangerous

hperrin@lemmy.ca · 1 pts · 83d (1 reply)

SLS didn’t have a failure nearly this bad.

protist@retrofed.com · 0 pts · 82d

But all the agencies responsible for SLS (NASA, Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin) have lengthy histories of engineering and construction of rocket systems and have had their fair share of catastrophies. Blue Origin does not have that history.

I can't believe I'm defending Blue Origin, I think I just threw up in my mouth

gandalf_der_12te@feddit.org · 1 pts · 83d (1 reply)

the thing is that the space industry was already in the hand of the NASA for like 5 decades and they did not manage to reduce the launch cost as much as spacex did.

Peppycito@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 83d

Spacex may be so cheap because they aren't profitable.

lettruthout@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 83d

Praise the camera operator

Gork@sopuli.xyz · 11 pts · 83d

I regret to inform you that the cylinder has been harmed.

cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 83d (4 replies)

Didn't even make it off the ground, pathetic.

Thorry@feddit.org · 5 pts · 83d (2 replies)

Well it was a static fire test, so it wasn't going to get off the ground no matter what.

CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 83d

Some of it made it off the ground…

cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 83d

Fair point. There also was lots of fire, so …

BradleyUffner@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 83d

Some parts of it did.

anomnom@sh.itjust.works · 5 pts · 83d (1 reply)

I wonder how the launch pads handle these. I’d be impressed if there’s anything usable left after that past maybe the concrete pad.

CookieOfFortune@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 83d

The main cost will be repairing the launch pad. It will take longer than building another rocket.

lacethespace@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 83d

Any casualties? Edit: "No one was injured during the failure"

NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 83d

That thing didn't even try...

PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@anarchist.nexus · 4 pts · 83d

Mr Krabs from SpongeBob cartoon playing world's smallest violin

unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 83d

Lame, the video cut off before we could hear the explosion :( Or was that wind like sound around 0:12 it and the mic is just garbage?