The speaker asserts that the US system is designed to prevent democracy. The evidence given is that democracy is not mentioned in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. He notes that John Adams wrote that if people could vote that they would abolish debt and redistribute land, so we can't have that.
No, democracy is voting. Who cares if your voice is heard, your concerns addressed, your best interests considered in all decisions, if you get to choose which person is in charge of making sure none of that happens. You fucking anarchists just hate freedom.
The Senate by its basic design is anti-democratic. Basically guaranteeing that an elite powerful group will always be able to keep control. The rest of the system is flawed and far from perfect. But honestly fairly workable. If it wasn't for the hobbling that has happened through the centuries. Such as capping the house. Keeping its membership small and static so it's easy to control again by wealthy powerful individuals.
Just abolishing the Senate and uncapping the house would go a long long way. If the house was set back to how it was set at it's founding. 1 per 30000 citizens. There would be over 10,000 Congressional representatives as opposed to the current 435. Though all that still is stopgap ultimately as the state realistically is the problem.
It doesn't encourage discussion at all and most of those posts I come across have no comments because obviously there's nothing to engage w if you just drop an article link and run off.
9 Comments
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 79d
mind providing a summary, instead of just dumping the link here?
iknewitwhenisawit@fedinsfw.app · 9 pts · 79d
The speaker asserts that the US system is designed to prevent democracy. The evidence given is that democracy is not mentioned in the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. He notes that John Adams wrote that if people could vote that they would abolish debt and redistribute land, so we can't have that.
ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 79d
No, democracy is voting. Who cares if your voice is heard, your concerns addressed, your best interests considered in all decisions, if you get to choose which person is in charge of making sure none of that happens. You fucking anarchists just hate freedom.
hanrahan@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 79d
I think Mr Adams also underestimated the depth of human stupidity and greed
they chose Trump this time around, could have primaried Bernie years ago, chose Reagan over Carter and ob and on.
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 79d
Thanks
Eldritch@piefed.world · 2 pts · 79d
The Senate by its basic design is anti-democratic. Basically guaranteeing that an elite powerful group will always be able to keep control. The rest of the system is flawed and far from perfect. But honestly fairly workable. If it wasn't for the hobbling that has happened through the centuries. Such as capping the house. Keeping its membership small and static so it's easy to control again by wealthy powerful individuals.
Just abolishing the Senate and uncapping the house would go a long long way. If the house was set back to how it was set at it's founding. 1 per 30000 citizens. There would be over 10,000 Congressional representatives as opposed to the current 435. Though all that still is stopgap ultimately as the state realistically is the problem.
SolarPunker@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 78d
Yeah that's should be a rule on the whole lemmy
Yliaster@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 78d
I know, right?
It doesn't encourage discussion at all and most of those posts I come across have no comments because obviously there's nothing to engage w if you just drop an article link and run off.
Mossheart@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 78d
That assumes discourse is the goal and not just clicks.