Novara Media was (is) basically the mouthpiece for Jeremy Corbyn back in the day. They've never liked anything short of a Corbyn premiership and their articles have been soaked in this heavy handed not so subtle bias for pushing a decade.
So I'm not surprised that they're shitting on Starmer whom they literally view as Judas.
This is all true, and Ash Sarkar even calls herself a communist. However, I'd rather my news outlets wore their politics on their sleeve, than trying to hide behind supposed "impartiality". Are there even any neutral news outlets?
For all his shortcomings, Starmer actually pushed back against Trump, to the point of aligning the UK with Europe rather than the US or some kind of equivocating position
10 Comments
Visstix@lemmy.world · 14 pts · 75d
The fuck is this russian propaganda piece?
nialv7@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 75d
After reading the article... I agree with you. The framing of this article is definitely suspect.
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 0 pts · 75d
Novara Media. Tells you all you need to know.
okwithmydecay@leminal.space · 4 pts · 75d
What is that supposed to mean? Most of the time, people vote up Novara Media articles. However, I acknowledge this is an exception to that.
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 75d
Novara Media was (is) basically the mouthpiece for Jeremy Corbyn back in the day. They've never liked anything short of a Corbyn premiership and their articles have been soaked in this heavy handed not so subtle bias for pushing a decade.
So I'm not surprised that they're shitting on Starmer whom they literally view as Judas.
okwithmydecay@leminal.space · 3 pts · 75d
This is all true, and Ash Sarkar even calls herself a communist. However, I'd rather my news outlets wore their politics on their sleeve, than trying to hide behind supposed "impartiality". Are there even any neutral news outlets?
mannycalavera@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 75d
GB News also wears their politics on their cravats 🤣. And yeah fair enough NV are unabashedly what they believe in.
Are there any neutral news outlets? Probably not strictly. But some are at least trying harder than others.
Chronal@piefed.social · 5 pts · 75d
I like how the article spends four paragraphs on Starmer before rambling on about how Ukraine joining NATO is a bad thing. 🤔
Trebuchet@europe.pub · 1 pts · 75d
Because who else could suck up to Trump as well as Rutte
AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space · 4 pts · 75d
For all his shortcomings, Starmer actually pushed back against Trump, to the point of aligning the UK with Europe rather than the US or some kind of equivocating position