cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/c/world/p/2179363/maga-advocate-calls-for-ban-on-pregnant-women-traveling-to-us-and-sterilization-of-all
Totally normal to suggest a ban on pregnant foreigners, the forced sterilization of all foreign visitors prior to entry, and the dissolution of the United States, when the supreme court doesn't rule in in your favor.
17 Comments
Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 56 pts · 64d
The eugenics guy is balding and wears glasses but thinks he has superior genetics. Lmao.
crandlecan@mander.xyz · 3 pts · 64d
But have you seen his jeans?? Nobody needs good genes with jeans like that!
Archangel1313@lemmy.ca · 24 pts · 64d
And then they complain when they get called "Nazis", like it's so unfair.
crandlecan@mander.xyz · 4 pts · 64d
Sigh. Again someone dragging Nazis into any discussion unrelated to the Führer, Adolph H. It's always the same with you socialist demoncrats 🙄 You guys are a thread to our fine Christian nation under god. Baby Jesus WILL get to you though! Repent!
FoxtrotDeltaTango@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 64d
Call them chudservatives
ilinamorato@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 64d
Ban on pregnant women: Twisted, disgusting, and sadly probably doable for a fascist hellstate like MAGA is trying for.
Forced sterilization of all foreign visitors: So ludicrously stupid as to be laughable. This person (derogatory) has a truly unhinged seven-point plan which is not only completely impossible, it's in a bonkers order:
Nullification (red states stop issuing birth certificates to Undesirables)
Pack the court (hilariously showing that the right has no new ideas)
Ban on pregnant women entering the US
Ban on women entering the US
Forced sterilization of tourists (the women you're not allowing in? You want to sterilize no one?)
The union is dissolved (why would you sterilize random people before you just went full Confederacy? Surely you could be even more cruel if you divested yourself of the pesky Constitution and its annoying Bill of Rights first!)
This is where it gets really unhinged: then he wants to amend the constitution. For a country that no longer exists, to stop women who are incapable of reproduction from illegally entering the US in case they're illegally pregnant because the packed court you hand-picked can't be trusted not to validate the birth certificates that states aren't issuing.
Even if you take this as a list of options instead of an ordered plan, the fact that a constitutional amendment is considered the last option just boggles the mind. These are an unserious people; toddlers making pouty-faced pronouncements and whining about people touching them.
crandlecan@mander.xyz · 18 pts · 64d
A typical case of "modern problems require Nazi solutions". Perfectly fine...
Jaysyn@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 64d
A sad fascist is the second best kind of fascist.
MrKoyun@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 64d
What's the first?
LordMayor@piefed.social · 9 pts · 64d
Dead
subverted_per@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 7 pts · 64d
This from the pro-forced-birth party
reluctant_squidd@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 64d
These asshats don’t deserve attention. Not even negative attention, just a lonely echo chamber.
WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today · 3 pts · 64d
Probably saw what this post was referring to.
Waterpumpee@lemmus.org · -15 pts · 64d
The problem this guy has is preggo women giving birgh and boom citizenship. I think a solution to this is to give citizenship by heritage, not birth place.
Zombiepirate@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 64d
Why not just go by the constitution? You know, the highest law of the land? It's explicit and clear about who is a citizen.
TipRing@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 64d
There's a process to change the constitution. If they want to go that route they have to follow that process.
SaucySnake@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 64d
Isn't that exactly what they want? The US does both which afaik is not the norm but has been traditionally seen as a positive for the growth of the country.