I don't think anyone will suffer if they don't see this (mildly interesting) post because they have chosen to hide nsfw content. I think anyone who decides to hide nsfw stuff has only themselves to blame if they miss the most interesting stuff.
I find this "don't censor obscenities here, whe're not on F*c*book" mentality just as annoying as the censoring itself. If you don't like the way someone is writing, don't read it. There are millions of other posts for you.
23 Comments
anton@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 31 pts · 42d
That's the zeroth date.
weird@sub.wetshaving.social · 7 pts · 42d
What's the first one then?
blackbeans@lemmy.zip · 8 pts · 42d
As the epoch is signed, the first date might refer to December 1901, at least for a 32-bit number.
SystemDisc@feddit.org · 5 pts · 41d
If it’s seconds past the Epoch, the integer 1 would be January 1st, 1970 12:00:01 AM
ranzispa@mander.xyz · 1 pts · 33d
I guess which it should be date 1. With the date expressed in milliseconds that'd make it 999 milliseconds earlier than what you wrote.
12:00:01 would be the time at which the guy finally came.
kubica@fedia.io · 1 pts · 42d
OddMinus1@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 41d
In java LinkedList, the method .get(0) is equivalent to .getFirst().
SystemDisc@feddit.org · 1 pts · 33d
This is a good point. Even in a zero-based index, the first element is the first element. So, the first date is still a zero timestamp.
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 28 pts · 42d
Holy overzealous NSFW tag, Batman! 🤦🏻😆
weird@sub.wetshaving.social · 9 pts · 42d
Better safe than sorry
Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 42d
Nah. Unnecessarily blurred (or, in the case of some user/client settings, completely hidden) posts are a nuisance.
Especially for something as innocuous as three letters of text.
brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works · 0 pts · 41d
I don't think anyone will suffer if they don't see this (mildly interesting) post because they have chosen to hide nsfw content. I think anyone who decides to hide nsfw stuff has only themselves to blame if they miss the most interesting stuff.
I find this "don't censor obscenities here, whe're not on F*c*book" mentality just as annoying as the censoring itself. If you don't like the way someone is writing, don't read it. There are millions of other posts for you.
ranzispa@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 33d
Fuckbook?
brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 33d
No, the thing I mean is much worse. I don't dare saying it's name, but it's a social network by **rk *uckerber*
ranzispa@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 33d
Dirk Fuckerberg?
brotundspiele@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 32d
Dork Suckerberk
vantablack@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 41d
came here to say basically this lmao
kungen@feddit.nu · 6 pts · 42d
And if we're still both 32 bits dating, instead of getting married into 64 bits, we'll have some problems in January 2038...
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 3 pts · 42d
How did people reproduce before that?
jwt@programming.dev · 12 pts · 42d
Sex before the first date.
jaybone@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 42d
I think that’s called assault.
jwt@programming.dev · 2 pts · 41d
You're assuming it's nonconsensual.
Tja@programming.dev · 2 pts · 42d
Depends on your time zone. It would still be new years eve in the US.
CocaineShrimp@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 41d
If someone who had conceived on 1 Jan 1970 they would be born around end of Aug / beginning of Sept, and be 56 years old