Did the problem begin right after a kernel upgrade? Slim chance, but only thing I can think of is maybe some module your boot process depends on is no longer built-in the kernel and needs to be added to initrd manually. I always have an LTS kernel installed as backup to be able to exclude these kind of fucky issues.
If you don't have an LTS kernel installed, you could try to boot a live usb, chroot into your EndeavourOS installation (don't forget to do a mount -a inside the chroot environment to mount boot and efi partitions) and install the LTS kernel. If you're able to reboot with an LTS kernel that makes debugging a whole lot easier.
Best of luck.
(The 'shorter uuids' are probably the vfat boot and efi partitions btw. Maybe you have access to lsblk or blkid in rescue mode to give some hints? You could compare them to live usb outputs of those commands)
I'm not thinking 'they couldn't possibly lead the polls', don't put words in my mouth. I did look it up, and all I'm saying is a few percentage points ahead (only since a couple of months, mind you) is definitely not a 'clear lead'. It may even be within the margin of error. I've also noticed extreme right/populist parties tend to be somewhat underpolled (at least in the USA, and also in my own country). So it would behoove you to be a little more cautious.
You said non-humanoid is a broad description like it's a negative. It's not. Fixating on making the robot humanoid unnecessarily narrows it down. Form and function are by definition not the same, so I don't understand what you mean by that. But I'm got going to stop because it seems.you're intentionally obtuse.
Yes that's the whole point. They're forcibly thinking in humanoid forms, while I dont care about form, I care about function. Make shit that's useful, and I dont care what package it comes in. In the vast majority of use cases it's incredibly cumbersome to have it in bipedal form; you to have reserve cpu power/mechanics/power for balance and shit, while not at all necessary for the tasks at hand.
That explanation is also the first paragraph of the article you're responding to btw.
Hell yes!
Oh well, that's good too I guess...
Did the problem begin right after a kernel upgrade? Slim chance, but only thing I can think of is maybe some module your boot process depends on is no longer built-in the kernel and needs to be added to initrd manually. I always have an LTS kernel installed as backup to be able to exclude these kind of fucky issues.
If you don't have an LTS kernel installed, you could try to boot a live usb, chroot into your EndeavourOS installation (don't forget to do a
mount -ainside the chroot environment to mount boot and efi partitions) and install the LTS kernel. If you're able to reboot with an LTS kernel that makes debugging a whole lot easier. Best of luck.(The 'shorter uuids' are probably the vfat boot and efi partitions btw. Maybe you have access to
lsblkorblkidin rescue mode to give some hints? You could compare them to live usb outputs of those commands)I'm not thinking 'they couldn't possibly lead the polls', don't put words in my mouth. I did look it up, and all I'm saying is a few percentage points ahead (only since a couple of months, mind you) is definitely not a 'clear lead'. It may even be within the margin of error. I've also noticed extreme right/populist parties tend to be somewhat underpolled (at least in the USA, and also in my own country). So it would behoove you to be a little more cautious.
I'm not quite sure that's correct.
Captain subtext: Nice [thousands of Irish jobs] you got there, would be a shame if something happened to them.
So a middle man is required /s (well, cynicism actually)
That's like accusing someone of blocking your punch.
Insights like these are why they pay him the big bucks. /s
government controlledsubsidized*fluctuates
In this loop 2 jobs get started and only 1 gets left. Anon is going to get real busy real soon.
Ah yes. America, famous for its diplomacy.
It was a rhetorical question, smartass
This is not the argument clinic.
You said non-humanoid is a broad description like it's a negative. It's not. Fixating on making the robot humanoid unnecessarily narrows it down. Form and function are by definition not the same, so I don't understand what you mean by that. But I'm got going to stop because it seems.you're intentionally obtuse.
Yes that's the whole point. They're forcibly thinking in humanoid forms, while I dont care about form, I care about function. Make shit that's useful, and I dont care what package it comes in. In the vast majority of use cases it's incredibly cumbersome to have it in bipedal form; you to have reserve cpu power/mechanics/power for balance and shit, while not at all necessary for the tasks at hand.
Non-humanoids can theoretically do that too.
Why do they keep insisting on humanoid? Just give me the crushinator to do chores for $10,000.