Oregon Power company hikes data center bills by 30%, cuts residential electricity costs by 1.3%
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/data-centers/power-company-hikes-data-center-bills-by-30-percent-cuts-residential-electricity-costs-by-1-3-percent-oregon-approves-change-through-power-act-pushes-developments-using-more-than-20-megawatts-of-power-to-pay-their-fair-share
489 points · 21 comments · view on lemmy.world
21 Comments
sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world · 93 pts · 50d
I'm confused why this isn't being done everywhere.
AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social · 63 pts · 50d
Bribes.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 22 pts · 49d
most of the states, govorners have been bribed, whitmer, mills,,etc. the gop are all on board.
MyOpinion@lemmy.today · 71 pts · 50d
This is the way.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world · 20 pts · 50d
Progressive utility rates in general...
Cheap at first to ensure everyone has enough, exponentially more expensive as usage increases so the people using too much pay the most.
ceenote@lemmy.world · 37 pts · 50d
But what if they pass on the expense to their users?
Then it'd be an even bigger win.
jumperalex@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 50d
I mean, they kinda of have to. I don't know that any data centers are running at a profit yet and that's even after they've switched to usage pricing; with the increased burn rate there's no way they can't raises price sooner rather than later.
ETA: but make no mistake, they will do anything they can to just make multiple smaller data centers that stay under the 20MW bend point. Maybe the economics will make sense, maybe it won't. Hopefully the 20MW and 30% figures involved some math by a bean counter to conclude the economics won't make sense.
velma@sh.itjust.works · 15 pts · 50d
Good shit
EntheoNaut@lemmy.ml · 14 pts · 50d
Proud of my state, mostly.
fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com · 7 pts · 49d
Same, we drop the ball at times but overall I like where we're headed.
sagoglex@piefed.social · 12 pts · 49d
I mean theres only so much money can do. You cant have infinite growth on a finite planet. Water doesnt grow on money.
Marija_@programming.dev · 9 pts · 49d
Seems fair
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 9 pts · 49d
My people 🥰
Atropos@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 48d
We're not perfect here, but we do make some good choices!
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 48d
Hey. Speak for yourself. 🤪
blazeknave@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 50d
What had Steyer said his ideas for California were? He kept saying he was going to take on the power companies but can't recall policy papers.
BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world · -6 pts · 49d
This has nothing to do with "fair share" you people are deranged. This is simple cost and profit calculation
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe · -9 pts · 50d
Lol, 1.3% is meaningless
So what did they do with the rest of the money?
ToastedRavioli@midwest.social · 26 pts · 50d
There are only so many data centers, so by hiking their rates 30% then they were able to reduce the already paid rate of probably 1.5M households by 1.3%. They didnt increase everyones rates 30% and then reduce it to 28.7% for the residential customer.
1.3% is pretty significant when youre talking about over a million accounts. Data centers use a ton of energy but thats a handful of accounts by comparison (or literally)
ripcord@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 50d
But nothing is good and everything sucks so this is invalid
DupaCycki@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 49d
Have you seen other power companies lowering prices instead of increasing them?