Your hearts in the right place, but you give them a inch and they'll take a mile.
You have to have an absolute stance on things when you make statements online just to match our discontent so the message is clear.
They're going to be trying to weasle in regardless, so it's not productive to assist them in any form. You just have to say a hard no regardless.
Also any messaging thats longer than a sentence and provides context goes straight in one ear and out the other. Make it simple stupid and make it repeatable.
8 Comments
ratel@mander.xyz · 72 pts · 17d
Next scrap those Palantir contracts.
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works · 40 pts · 17d
And get rid of the online ID checks too
Tangentism@lemmy.ml · 26 pts · 17d
And scrap the met police roll out of fixed position facial recognition cameras across London
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net · 16 pts · 17d
Rip the cameras down
Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml · -12 pts · 17d
Or just only require those ID checks if people want algorithmic recommendations.
FoxAlive@lemmy.zip · 14 pts · 17d
Your hearts in the right place, but you give them a inch and they'll take a mile.
You have to have an absolute stance on things when you make statements online just to match our discontent so the message is clear.
They're going to be trying to weasle in regardless, so it's not productive to assist them in any form. You just have to say a hard no regardless.
Also any messaging thats longer than a sentence and provides context goes straight in one ear and out the other. Make it simple stupid and make it repeatable.
mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 13d
Well said
ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com · 21 pts · 17d
Something good at least.