cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1284061/new-jersey-bans-grocery-stores-from-using-shoppers-personal-data-to-set-prices
New Jersey bans grocery stores from using shoppers' personal data to set prices
https://www.nj.gov/governor/news/2026/approved/20260723a.shtml
20 Comments
DrPop@lemmy.world · 55 pts · 32d
This shouldn't even be up for debate.
mereo@piefed.ca · 20 pts · 32d
And the fact that it is a debate tell you everything about the state of the world today... sigh
chillpanzee@lemmy.ml · 47 pts · 32d
They could solve this problem and a bunch of others by banning the surveillance and collection of user data without consent.
pemptago@lemmy.ml · 13 pts · 32d
Can't help but imagine this would result in having to "read" and sign a 70 page ToS and 30 page Privacy Policy before we can buy groceries.
Stinkywizzleteats@piefed.social · -11 pts · 32d
sounds like a job for foss AI. I'm sure a ToS specific model running on a CPU would be more than enough. I think that's what Pegasus does and I'm sure there are more. copy and paste, get a ELI5, then decide.
edit: I bet someone could flimflam it into a browser extension.
ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip · 11 pts · 31d
The reading isn't the issue. It's the fact that it would become standard to force customers to get surveillance consent for access to FOOD
Stinkywizzleteats@piefed.social · 5 pts · 31d
how the heck did I miss the groceries part?
Jack@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 32d
How dare you question the orphan-crushing economy!
This comment sponsored by Torment Nexus Inc.
cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au · 9 pts · 32d
The fact they're trying is still a problem.
Brewchin@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 31d
This is the way.
Terrifying that it takes state intervention to do this most basic of things. Fuck this timeline.
NOT_RICK@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 32d
I would die for my country, New Jersey
abrake@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 31d
Bruce Springsteen and Bon Jovi would pour a drink out in your honor
Hello_there@fedia.io · 7 pts · 32d
More perfect union did a few stories about this. Beware the bill that looks like it helps but secretly opens the door to doing the same thing. Basically, don't believe what you see until someone you trust says it will actually help.
bluGill@fedia.io · 3 pts · 32d
Don't trust it until lawyers have had months to examine the exact wording. Loopholes are to easy to hide. Often a other wise good bill will have something awful in it such that you must oppose the whole
Sanguine@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 32d
Yet another common NJ W.
pemptago@lemmy.ml · 1 pts · 32d
For those not in NJ trying to avoid this, pay in cash and punch in a random phone number at the register.
You may need to try a few numbers at self-checkout to find a working one, but it's surprisingly easy. Rotate the numbers to dirty up the data of these parasites.
rollin@piefed.social · 4 pts · 32d
er what? Are you saying people in US have to enter their phone number every time they buy stuff??
adarza@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 31d
"loyalty cards" are common. stores (and each of their 369354764 data sharing "partners") get to track everything you buy and when. in exchange, you get token "discounts" on a small selection of products. some stores have done away with the actual physical cards, and use mobile phone apps or just the mobile phone number to track you.
rollin@piefed.social · 1 pts · 31d
ah got you, thanks for the explanation
runner_g@piefed.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 31d
just use Jenny's number. Guaranteed* to work in all 50 states and the district of Columbia.
*this is a lie.