bluGill

u/bluGill@fedia.io
1 posts · 2.6k comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

on How do we quit YouTube? · c/ask · 7 pts · 1d

My problem is the content is there. Cppcon: in person our on YouTube. As is just about every other conference. Peertube is great when you can find something but only a tiny minority of what i want is there.

Hook a small motor to it. Small is key, a bike light is too big. Those toy 'stomper' trucks that run on a single AA battery is about all I would hope for. Of you want useful power you need longer blades and less of them. These are designed to turn fast with very little wind without going to fast in big winds. It should be fun and you learn, but of you want useful it is a waste of time. You're choice of goals.

'This old Tony' disassembled one on YouTube a few years ago if you want to know what is inside. He didn't try to get it working after and if he doesn't have confidence in doing that, then you shouldn't either. As others said the pressures are dangerous, higher than your normal air compressor so what his videos to see what is inside them throw it away. They are fairly cheap considering.

You turn the regular down because the springs are compressed when they are up high and they will eventually fatigue and wear out. Realistically they probably will last longer than the compressor itself so I'm not sure if it matters or not.

As for the setting, that depends on the tools. If you are just inflating tires, it doesn't matter how high you go. Go when high is good because that puts more air in the line when start. Some tools particularly paint sprayers need lower pressure, so you need to turn the regulator down. For a typical home compressor, everything else can handle the max pressure. There are high power industrial compressors or things they use to fill scuba tanks that put much more pressure and then you need a regulator to turn down to a safe pressure for the tool if you are using them, but odds are you aren't.

Even hand coded projects need more than 6 months before I'll replace anything in my stacks. Too many projects start with great intention but then the founder gets bored (life gets in the way?) and they go unmaintained. Really I'm looking for projects that enough developers have got involved in that I can be confident it won't go stagnant. I could be one of those developers, but I don't have enough time to contribute to all the different projects I use (I barely have time to contribute to the one project I maintain)

The system is working: nobody is perfect, but we have redundancy in place to detect problems and fix them latter.

The real dangerous systems are the ones where problems are covered up and ignored. You will get a false impression that they are safe until it is too late.

For the simple cases, a language package manager is easier to write and makes things easy. However, simple cases aren't at everything and for the more complex cases, such as what C and C++ is commonly used for, a language package manager is not complex enough to handle all the little weird special cases and so it would be a bad idea.

Those who use a language for something complex will not use the built-in package manager. Realistically though, very few people are writing complex software and so this objection, although real, is probably a pedantic thing that doesn't affect you.