Climate change and more than a century of overzealous fire suppression are now fueling wildfires so severe that they’re wiping out the very forests that need fire to thrive — leaving iconic landscapes at risk of turning into brush and scrub, permanently.
Over the past quarter century, high-severity wildfires have burned 2.3 million acres of California’s forestland so completely that the trees are unlikely to return on their own — according to a working draft of the state’s new reforestation strategy obtained by CalMatters.
16 Comments
arotrios@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 26d
Californian climate refugee here. The issue isn't that they can't plant more trees. The issue (dependent on species, of course) is that the trees have stopped sprouting at the same time that they've been under a massive decades long assault by an invasive species, bark beetles:
In the Napa Valley, the hillsides were covered in Douglas Fir. About 20 years ago, they began to die as the bark beetles spread along the ridgelines, leaving swathes of dead, hollowed out tree trunks. It was bad, but manageable at first - the fir were still sprouting seedlings.
But after things continued to get hotter, the seedling growth slowed. The forests got drier, filled with dead timber, and between 2017 - 2021, about half of the western hills and most of the eastern ridge was burnt. And when I say burnt, I do not mean your standard burn - it was razed to the ground by fire tornadoes 90' tall, in places that hadn't burnt in over 200 years.
Five years later, the forest is coming back - but not the same. There are bay laurel and oak seedlings now about 5' tall - they're adapted for hotter weather. Normally, the Douglas Fir would be there as well, but there are no seedlings at all.
It's become too hot for them to germinate in the Napa Valley. The seeds won't sprout.
If there's one small silver lining, it's that the big trees will eventually come back - just not the Douglas Fir. The more heat resistant Ponderosa has begun showing up, and in 20 - 30 years will likely become the dominant big tree on the ridgelines.
20 years ago, the Napa Valley was like Bordeaux. Now the climate is like Sicily, and the deep forest is gone.
Visit your local forest now. Savor what it is NOW. Because it's very likely you will live to see it burn, and once it burns, it will never come back the same way again.
curiousaur@reddthat.com · 2 pts · 26d
Yeah that's just the Sonoma climate, which isn't far away from Napa. Live oak meadows.
dreksob@feddit.online · 9 pts · 26d
The problem is largely down to climate change, mismanagement of water, invasive species, and Conservatives.
Climate change seems obvious, but trees are generally pretty reliant on having specific temperature ranges, and specific conditions. As climate change gets worse, the more extreme weather events get worse. Extreme conditions can kill trees, evaporate surface water, deprive areas of rain, kill bushes, impact animals etc. Individual trees are decently likely to survive one bad year, but sustained droughts/heat/irregular weather patterns etc can change the surrounding forest, and trees are a lot more the effect of specific forest conditions than the cause.
Mismanagement of water is obvious, huge amounts of water are being pumped from reservoirs, dropping goundwater levels to the points that trees dont have access. Rivers and lakes are being contained, and not allowed to flood. As previously wet ground dries out (both from lack of rain, and from not having rivers), its profile changes, and the kinds of trees it can support changes. But the kinds of trees that dry ground can support often cant survive the other conditions (elevation, temperature, soil Ph, animals etc).
Invasive species. Bark Beetles are one of the biggest problems, but spongy moths and other invasive insects are killing trees by the bucketfull. Additionally, invasive species like eucalyptus, palm, and salt-cedar restrict water access, ruin the ground, and choke out native trees. Invasive bushes like tree of heaven, spanish broom, greater periwinkle and giant reed can grow quickly, before dying and drying out during a particularly harsh summer, this dried plant mat makes for fire ladders, easy kindling and massively wildfire risk.
Conservatives. Conservatives have been pushing to allow private companies and owners to destroy forests, wetlands and other necessary habitat for basically whatever reason. Conservatives push to allow companies like nestle to pump unlimited water from aquafers, and allow AI data centers to take whatever is left. Conservatives have been consistently anti-science and anti-education, and both are needed to restore forests.
RunningInRVA@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 26d
Which means it will eventually turn to desert.
forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 3 pts · 26d
Is it always forest to desert, or are their other options to shift to?
RunningInRVA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 26d
It ain’t gonna be frozen tundra unless nuclear winter happens first.
forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 26d
This made me curious so I went searching for more terms that cover land types.
https://www.arcticatlas.org/glossary/
ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net · 1 pts · 26d
We could pour concrete over it...
A_A@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 26d
i agree. Also : patches of forest widely separated by strips of desert or rocky land would be much more resilient against fire.
Prox@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 27d
Don't worry, California. I've started recycling my plastic bottles. Climate change should be over in no time now.
forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 5 pts · 26d
For anyone who hasn't seen it:
"Plastic Recycling is an Actual Scam" by Climate Town: https://youtu.be/PJnJ8mK3Q3g
(Edit to add Nebula link: https://nebula.tv/videos/climatetown-plastic-recycling-is-an-actual-scam-climate-town/ )
"i'm pretty sure recycling isn't real" by David Achu: https://youtu.be/68zjxTTl5Ik
QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 26d
Do you have a more relible source than some youtuber?
forkDestroyer@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 26d
Watch the climate town video, which I remember going over sources, if you'd like.
a_non_monotonic_function@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 26d
There have been a number of news articles over the past decade. A lot of our shit gets shipped overseas to be burned or create a trash mountain.
MonkeMischief@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 26d
Excellent sources, however I'd also like to balance out that it isn't 100% all bad and terrible. Some progress can be made if we're able to drive it in the right direction!
https://youtu.be/pl0IzBZ95vk?is=FIFLJ1jmWjVfeSc1
A_A@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 26d
"California can’t replant its forests fast enough to ..." ...to fuel its wildfires as it tries to do?
Maybe try something else.