On Thursday, Flock announced plans to require all agencies with access to license plate reader data to use a safety tool that automatically detects abnormal activity and locks out cops who abuse their access to stalk people they know in their personal lives.
Flock’s audit assistance tool suspends access when user activity “meets defined criteria for abnormal behavior,” Flock said. The suspension can only be lifted by administrator review, with the goal being “to intervene before misuse becomes recurring or widespread.”
9 Comments
velma@sh.itjust.works · 17 pts · 18d
If it can be lifted by administrator review, it is worthless.
All of this is to save face now that the public's opinion on Flock has turned so much and it's been revealed that cops are abusing it.
Wren@lemmy.today · 10 pts · 18d
Yep, their attempts to curtail abuse amount to a nothingburger when cops are responsible for disciplining their own. I don't even need to pull up numbers for how many credible complaints against the police actually end in punitive measures, I just need to gesture broadly.
schipelblorp@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 18d
I used to work for a state child welfare agency and any and all access to records was monitored and oftentimes you needed to be approved to have access to high-profile cases.
The problem isn't that you can't create systems of accountability--you can. The problem is cops will get around any system you create because they know they won't be fired or sanctioned for circumventing them. The problem is that cops are fundamentally unaccountable.
In other words:
CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de · 6 pts · 18d
Administrator review?
I’d be willing to bet that a lot of cops are just sharing one login.
AxisExperience9@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 18d
I say this as a big technology lover and enthusiast, but we "can't tech our way out" of most issues in our society, but that seems to be the trend lately
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe · -1 pts · 18d
Um, yea, they don't want to. Never did.
Wren@lemmy.today · 0 pts · 18d
Did you read the article or just the headline?
Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe · -1 pts · 18d
It's all a token "look good".
And no, I didn't, because we already know Flock's agenda. So. It's just more noise, more ragebait.
And if it isn't, maybe a non-ragebait headline wouldn't induce a response like mine.
Wren@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 18d
What.