Suspecting court of using AI, man injected prompts in filings to try to win case
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/08/suspecting-court-of-using-ai-man-injected-prompts-in-filings-to-try-to-win-case/
18 points · 10 comments · view on lemmy.world
10 Comments
chickenf622@sh.itjust.works · 9 pts · 21d
I do the same in resumes if you're not going to read my resume I'm going to waste your time as much as I can.
aaaa@piefed.world · 5 pts · 21d
But if this court doesn't use AI to review the filings as the judge insists, then this is harmless as a human reviewer can simply ignore the tiny hidden text.
I understand the judge wants to feel respected, but this should be a non-issue and should not warrant sanctions
draco_aeneus@mander.xyz · 2 pts · 20d
It's a wilful attempt at defrauding the court, even if it were to fail, though. If I try to bribe the judge, but he doesn't take it, should that be fine?
I don't think we should be using LLMs for legal proceedings, but this stands kind of separate from that.
aaaa@piefed.world · 3 pts · 20d
If the court is using lie machines to review their filings, then any attempt to fight that is merely self defense. Legal or not
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world · -2 pts · 20d
So you think attempted murder should be ok too, since no one actually got hurt?
PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 20d
If the govt claims that nobody is hiding behind the curtain, then the govt cannot claim that shooting the curtain is attempted murder.
BradleyUffner@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 20d
If the person believed that there was someone behind it, and fired a gun at it with intent to kill, it's attempted murder.
Garbagio@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 20d
Thanks, bud. 8am and I already saw the dumbest shit I'll see all day.
HubertManne@piefed.social · 1 pts · 20d
yeah this is one of those things that is hard to argue technically but is obvious common sense wise. I mean its not the hardest. murder is one of the highest crimes were as a fair and impartial process from peers is a right.
aaaa@piefed.world · 0 pts · 20d
That's very different than what we are talking about?