c/shitposting · by oldmanalex@sh.itjust.works · 3dI learned to never ask the opinions of others on the internet 54 points · 13 comments · view on lemmy.world
13 Comments
Death__BySnuSnu@lemmy.world · 29 pts · 3d
Good thing they concealed the names for privacy.
Trex202@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 3d
Low-key doxing
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 3d
Not even a particularly controversial opinion.
Do you support body autonomy, or not?
Gladaed@feddit.org · 12 pts · 3d
There very much is an argument against it.
The risk of abuse weighs much more severe, your core family has different societal roles and you just shouldn't do that.
funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works · 12 pts · 3d
technically that is handled in the OP by "consensual" but I agree that consent can be manufactured
Weirdfish@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 3d
The only valid argument against is the genetic issues if there is a baby. So long as there is no reproducing there is no problem.
Chl0r0f0rm_Angel@sh.itjust.works · 8 pts · 3d
Oh yeah. Lemmy incest debate: let's fucking goooo
tacosanonymous@mander.xyz · 7 pts · 3d
Is it even illegal?
I know they make laws regarding marriage. I don’t remember them being about sex, specifically.
Well, I guess I remember sodomy laws so, maybe.
AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 2d
It is in some places.
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 2d
Sodomy is all the really good stuff.
ColdWater@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 1d
Whoever doing that censoring job should apply for a government job
BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today · 5 pts · 2d
You think THAT'S the weirdest opinion you could get? You haven't been on the Internet long, have you?
LodeMike@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 1d
The only reason why it tends to be shunned is that any babies created from it typically have problems. Cousins were usually OK because the problems were less visible.