Distillation can be a legitimate research technique, but American officials and AI executives have long complained that the volume and targeted manner of Chinese distillation campaigns against US firms amount to stealing.
Cry me a river Scam Altman and cohorts.
4 Comments
thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 12 pts · 3d
Total "you're trying to kidnap what I've rightfully stolen" vibes
ZDL@lazysoci.al · 8 pts · 3d
I know, right? The same people who flatly said that enforcing copyright would "destroy [their] business model" (yes, they were that brazen!) are now whining that someone is doing to them what they literally did to all of humanity.
snoons@lemmy.ca · 7 pts · 3d
panda_abyss@lemmy.ca · 6 pts · 2d
As opposed to the American companies, that hit some of my client’s websites with 60 req/s for months on end on the search endpoints — each scraper is doing this, Meta then Claude then OpenAI then Google.
As opposed to the US companies that stole my git repos and blog and claimed copyright and licensing doesn’t apply.
As opposed to the US companies that cannot confirm they didn’t steal the Navier Stokes proof, train their models on it, but then offered include the original author if he cuts out another author.
As opposed to the US companies that knowingly let their AI hack the tests, but kept quiet since it helps the benchmarks.