"dead cat strategy" or "deadcatting" is when a shocking statement is made to divert media attention away from problems or failures in other areas.
TIL the name for one of Trump's distraction techniques
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_strategy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_cat_strategy
"dead cat strategy" or "deadcatting" is when a shocking statement is made to divert media attention away from problems or failures in other areas.
21 Comments
StillAlive@piefed.world · 94 pts · 3d
And when he keeps doing it over and over again
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_the_zone
DupaCycki@lemmy.world · 22 pts · 3d
Bro is literally in the second sentence of the definition lmao
Crackhappy@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 3d
TIL that Trump is a bunch of dead cats in a trench coat.
sukhmel@programming.dev · 4 pts · 3d
His economic strategy, too
artwork@lemmy.world · 21 pts · 3d
Thank you for the reference!
At some military task, I recall someone shared a thought from a TV show they watched, the one I do still remember. I am not very experienced in Russian language, though I've been into it for at least a decade, mostly for art, and the job assignments around the globe.
That is, the TV show was/is called "Что? Где? Когда?", which if I am not mistaken, may be translated to "What? Where? When?".
Generally, the show is about teams who compete in answering various challenging questions sharing experience, erudition, and dedication in subjects.
Back then, I invested quite of time to actually find the excerpt... and I still have the page in bookmarks! It is still online! It was long ago indeed...
The excerpt the colleague mentioned was the following found (translated from Russian, and its verbatim below):
::: spoiler Verbatim/Original
The thing is I haven't found the name of the actual philosopher still...
Do you have any idea who he is?
sukhmel@programming.dev · 4 pts · 3d
I wonder if there was no known philosopher with that idea and the question author speaks of themselves in third person 🌚
73rdnemesio@infosec.pub · 16 pts · 3d
They’re eating the cats and dogs strategy
f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz · 1 pts · 2d
Their accusations are projection. Every time. I can only assume RFK Jr. is wolfing down hot dogs and hot cats right off the asphalt.
Tollana1234567@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 3d
also the firehose of false hood. and its mostly to distract from the epstein and the BBB.
MalReynolds@slrpnk.net · 10 pts · 3d
AKA flooding the zone, works best with a 24 hour news cycle. Thanks US for all your "innovation".
DagwoodIII@piefed.social · 7 pts · 3d
Also see 'Gish gallop'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop
sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz · 5 pts · 3d
better late to catch on than never
melsaskca@lemmy.ca · 5 pts · 2d
Makes sense. trump always said "you can grab them by the cat". /s
CobraChicken3000@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 3d
"They're eating the dogs! "
RumorsOfLove@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 4 pts · 3d
To distract from the attempt to build a Skynet.
Knoxer@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
Kojima predicted everything in mgs2, now the problem is: did he predict everything in mgs4 too?
Zier@fedia.io · 2 pts · 2d
It should be called the "cat eating" strategy because it's the most ridiculous, unbelievable and unimaginative shit anyone can make up.
They can't even lie correctly, the feckin' losers. What a liberty!
Arancello@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 3d
at what point will we see zombie cats?
zshivan@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 3d
Can the mods of this sub make more firm principles on posting rules? This title has nothing to do with the definition it's describing. Instead, it's an example of it. I'd consider opting out of here if nothing changes. Posts like this would've been removed on reddit. It's a place for what people learned, not for what people feel about what they learned. It's impossible to remove subjectivity but this post imo crossed the line.
idiomaddict@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 3d
The Wikipedia entry disagrees.
Vanth@reddthat.com · 7 pts · 3d
Rule 6 - one could post a [meta] post to comment on this sub and it's rules instead of distracting from the parent post (potential rule 8 vio if the mods were really particular). I would encourage you to [meta] post and propose the new rule or amended rule you think would address the problem you have with this sub; don't just complain, try to make the community in better. (And since you're new to Lemmy, please be aware "well, reddit did it this way" does not carry water with a lot of folks here. I would encourage you to include more independent justification for your proposed rule).
Or one could try to argue I violated rule 5 for "promoting an agenda" but since the Wikipedia article specifically mentions Trump as an example of the technique, I think any such argument would be a stretch. Again, up to how particular our mods are.