I do think it's all the same person (or maybe two or three).
I simply can't see a tankie motivation in this behaviour. It does not relate to their ideology (which doesn't mean tankies cannot be misogynist neckbeards, but at least it is not rooted in their political ideology).
Well, the Tankies ran similar campaigns in South Korea leading to economic and political consequences. And Tankies are among the only group investing resources into psyops on Lemmy.
I remind you that Tankies promoted MAGA in the USA and AfD in Germany.
Another potential explanation is religious extremist(s) pushing anti-women sentiment.
I am not familiar with that development, can you provide sources for me to read up on it?
Do you mean about the Gender War in South Korea in general or do you mean how it correlates heavily with support of far-right and populism? It makes sense for China, with a strong disproportion in gender ratio ever since the time they killed females at birth, to make themselves seem more favorable than the surrounding nations to women.
not because Tankies want to continue the marginalisation of women.
They had a word for people who cooperated with the Nazis. They called them Nazis.
Personally I find the stripping of agency from women to be far more detremental. Obviously women as a whole aren't culpable. It only speaks to your own biases that that was your assumption.
Two grown men according to your article. Encouraged by the Jim Crow-Era social conduct.
Do not try to stir up some misogynist bullshit here. Do not try to relativize racism here. That shit won't fly here.
Edit after your edit: I am not making assumptions. You are. There is nothing in the article that says the woman told her husband and brother-in-law to go kill that boy. It is you constructing such a causality out of thin air.
I don't know her motivation. I do not assume. I just know that two men brutally murdered a child for racist motives and you are trying to make that into women being a systemic problem (because that is what the bear discussion is about. Systemic, socially normalised violence). Wrong turn.
Another edit after your edit: nobody says all men were the same though. You are just trying to imply I would.
Racists gonna racist. Who cares which junk they have in their pants? What's next, gonna point out that they wore watches? Watch wearers are horrible people!!1!
Irrelevant info leads to useless patterns. The relevance is that racists are horrible. You don't need more for that pattern.
23 Comments
the_fuckler@nord.pub · 21 pts · 2d
Wife baaadddd
RQG@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
Nah at manipulative tears turning into anger you leave. If you married such a person you messed up.
CrimeIsLegalNow@ani.social · 1 pts · 1d
Or, hear me out, maybe you shouldn't take OP's word on this when they run to Internet to post memes for validation.
RQG@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 14h
At that point why even interact with anyone on the internet.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 16 pts · 2d
I really do wonder what the goal is of these people who attempt to start a gender war on the fediverse. It's gotta be the Tankies, right?
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 18 pts · 2d
No, I think it's just some Nice Guys™ discovering a new platform.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 3 pts · 2d
Maybe this one is, but in the past there have been not just posts but campaigns that would last a few days spanning many questionable accounts.
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 2d
I do think it's all the same person (or maybe two or three).
I simply can't see a tankie motivation in this behaviour. It does not relate to their ideology (which doesn't mean tankies cannot be misogynist neckbeards, but at least it is not rooted in their political ideology).
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 3 pts · 2d
Well, the Tankies ran similar campaigns in South Korea leading to economic and political consequences. And Tankies are among the only group investing resources into psyops on Lemmy.
I remind you that Tankies promoted MAGA in the USA and AfD in Germany.
Another potential explanation is religious extremist(s) pushing anti-women sentiment.
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 0 pts · 2d
I am not familiar with that development, can you provide sources for me to read up on it?
Because they have common goals towards Russia, not because Tankies want to continue the marginalisation of women.
Could be, could be not. I tend to go with the answer with the least necessary assumptions until further evidence.
FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 2 pts · 1d
Do you mean about the Gender War in South Korea in general or do you mean how it correlates heavily with support of far-right and populism? It makes sense for China, with a strong disproportion in gender ratio ever since the time they killed females at birth, to make themselves seem more favorable than the surrounding nations to women.
They had a word for people who cooperated with the Nazis. They called them Nazis.
rimu@piefed.social · 8 pts · 2d
No it's just what happens when you automatically repost stuff from reddit - whatever psyops / culture war is going on there end up over here too.
time2lose is sanitation. https://lemmy.world/u/time2lose?page=1&sort=New&view=Comments
Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world · -11 pts · 2d
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emmett_Till
Sometimes women are the bear.
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 16 pts · 2d
Trying to twist a racist lynch murder of a 14 year old boy into "muh, women bad" is a choice. A disgusting, despicable choice, but a choice.
Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 2d
Who initiated the racist lynch murder? Was it a woman?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sometimes
Personally I find the stripping of agency from women to be far more detremental. Obviously women as a whole aren't culpable. It only speaks to your own biases that that was your assumption.
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 2d
Two grown men according to your article. Encouraged by the Jim Crow-Era social conduct.
Do not try to stir up some misogynist bullshit here. Do not try to relativize racism here. That shit won't fly here.
Edit after your edit: I am not making assumptions. You are. There is nothing in the article that says the woman told her husband and brother-in-law to go kill that boy. It is you constructing such a causality out of thin air.
Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 2d
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 2d
The violence still came from men. They killed a 14 year old boy. Do you think that's excusable or what?
Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 2d
Of course not. Do you think her intention was a stern talking to?
The idea of painting all men with this brush is plain mysandry btw.
CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 2d
I don't know her motivation. I do not assume. I just know that two men brutally murdered a child for racist motives and you are trying to make that into women being a systemic problem (because that is what the bear discussion is about. Systemic, socially normalised violence). Wrong turn.
Another edit after your edit: nobody says all men were the same though. You are just trying to imply I would.
surewhynotlem@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 2d
Racists gonna racist. Who cares which junk they have in their pants? What's next, gonna point out that they wore watches? Watch wearers are horrible people!!1!
Irrelevant info leads to useless patterns. The relevance is that racists are horrible. You don't need more for that pattern.