Since I'm not sure what this means, I must have not be clear enough; apologies. Gadget Review's articles (one of which is your link) are very likely to be AI-generated.
Over-hypey phrases as headings: "The Only Fix That Sticks", "You Can’t Just Hardcode Safety Into a Probability Machine"
Characteristic bolding
Unexpected bulleted lists in every article
Overuse of spaced em-dashes
Familiar sentence structures:
Flock's brand is damaged. Axon is winning contracts. The underlying infrastructure — persistent, automated tracking of where every car travels — keeps running, like a streaming service that changes its name while keeping the same content library.
Non-deterministic models resist fixed rules, so the answer is containment and monitoring — not commandments.
Gadget Review gets articles out at an impossible frequency and often simply recycles other sources. Yahoo News is a feed reader that only displays news from other websites (while obscuring source information that could be gleaned from URLs), whose identity it displays at the top of each article (in this case, Gadget Review).
Your submission in "The U.S. dumped 500,000 tons of oyster shells back into the ocean in 2007. Nearly two decades later, they have created a thriving habitat for thousands of marine species" was removed as repost of questionable reliability (rule c)1).
Please replace the Yahoo News link with one to the original. Yahoo News is a feed that aggregates news from outlets, and it displays the source for each item at the top.
Your submission in "United Soccer League Announces USL Premier, New Interconnected Men’s Professional Structure" was removed as not uplifting (as far as I can tell as a non-USL guy).
Your submission in "Almost Half of US Data Centers That Were Supposed to Open This Year Slated to Be Canceled or Delayed" was removed as too borderline schadenfreude and old.
To pre-empt possible reports: This is plausibly uplifting, and it's the votes that represent how we respond to this news. With these downvotes I doubt it'd show up in any feed, and that should be enough.
Opening a little reply chain here for the active mods (@sga013@lemmy.world, @NickwithaC@lemmy.world, and I) to discuss whether this violates rule a), "Posts must be uplifting". I think a pretty good argument can be made here that it is uplifting and the article presents this argument. Since the contention isn't whether this is schadenfreude (commenters don't seem to think so) but whether this is good, I believe the upvoters also agree this is uplifting.
Since I'm not sure what this means, I must have not be clear enough; apologies. Gadget Review's articles (one of which is your link) are very likely to be AI-generated.
Here's the missing link to said Washington Examiner article:
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/technology/4672621/flock-controversial-camera-contracts-canceled-23-states/
Gadget Review gets articles out at an impossible frequency and often simply recycles other sources. Yahoo News is a feed reader that only displays news from other websites (while obscuring source information that could be gleaned from URLs), whose identity it displays at the top of each article (in this case, Gadget Review).
Your submission in "Nah it wasn't him. He was with me studying about Jesus." was removed as not uplifting, not news (rule a)).
Your submission in "Someone Cut Down Every Single Flock Camera in This Town in a Single Night" was removed as schadenfreude (rule a)1).
Your submission in "Flock cameras across Minnesota are being vandalized in response to data privacy concerns" was removed as schadenfreude (rule a)1).
Your submission in "The U.S. dumped 500,000 tons of oyster shells back into the ocean in 2007. Nearly two decades later, they have created a thriving habitat for thousands of marine species" was removed as repost of questionable reliability (rule c)1).
Please replace the Yahoo News link with one to the original. Yahoo News is a feed that aggregates news from outlets, and it displays the source for each item at the top.
In line with our rules against bad copies, could you replace the link with one to the original The Independent post?
Your submission in "Occupation army faces reserve troop, tank shortages" was removed as schadenfreude, war is not uplifting (rule a)).
Your submission in ""F COLLINS!" Hundreds march to Senator Collins Office in Portland Maine" was removed as toxic politics (rule b)).
Your submission in "Veterans challenge 4th of July lies" was removed as toxic politics (rule b)).
Your submission in "United Soccer League Announces USL Premier, New Interconnected Men’s Professional Structure" was removed as not uplifting (as far as I can tell as a non-USL guy).
Your submission in "Almost Half of US Data Centers That Were Supposed to Open This Year Slated to Be Canceled or Delayed" was removed as too borderline schadenfreude and old.
Would you kindly remove
/ampfrom the link? It is forcing upon us a mobile version of the site.Your submission in "3 Founding Fathers died on July 4th" was removed as not uplifting (rule a)).
To pre-empt possible reports: This is plausibly uplifting, and it's the votes that represent how we respond to this news. With these downvotes I doubt it'd show up in any feed, and that should be enough.
The linked article is an inferior but true copy of https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/new-eu-rules-stop-destruction-unsold-clothes-and-shoes-2026-02-09_en , an EU press release with the same headline and, as far as I can tell, true.
sounds like we should get off telegram! (or at least the official client?)
WebP is a pretty awesome format with awesome compression, both lossless and lossy. It's only behind JXL which is not widely adopted.
Opening a little reply chain here for the active mods (@sga013@lemmy.world, @NickwithaC@lemmy.world, and I) to discuss whether this violates rule a), "Posts must be uplifting". I think a pretty good argument can be made here that it is uplifting and the article presents this argument. Since the contention isn't whether this is schadenfreude (commenters don't seem to think so) but whether this is good, I believe the upvoters also agree this is uplifting.