Do you not remember covid? Your treatlerites rioted in Montréal and tried to do a J6 over the most tepid restrictions. The ones jerking off over a romantic idea of fighting a war aren't prepared to spend years living without the lifestyle they're accustomed to and have themselves and their families randomly imprisoned or murdered by the evil empire they've served so faithfully. You'd be closer to the conditions of the IRA than Vietnam or Iran, except even they had a history of genocides to radicalize people.
See I always interpreted it as a way to get "moderate republicans" on board; triangulation tells them that if they move their policies to the right, then moderates who are afraid of good polucy will vote for them. I remember Obama talking about how not free his healthcare plan was, repeating "skin in the game" dozens of times.
Where you get the funds is irrelevant to the conversation, I am trying to understand the mind of somebody who genuinely believes complicated, means-tested tax breaks is better policy than literally just giving people checks with your party's name on it.
I assumed this was like cable-news poisoned boomers who like free healthcare and not haulling their neighbors off to concentration camps and not blowing up school children in Iran, but had it drilled into their head that complicated, means-tested healthcare for the deserving is more feasible, and having ICE politely escorting their neighbors into a van out of view is more realistic, and waging the war more competently is electable.
But someone who genuinely wants the enshittifed-until-they-help-nobody versions of good policies is baffling to me.
No innocent person has ever not wanted to go to court, due to the fear of miscarriage of justice or the perception of people like Knock_knock_Lemmy_in.
Western media did a lot of nazi propaganda, from portraying them as more competent, disciplined, and technologically advanced than the allies to the "clean wehrmacht" to asiatic hordes myths.
Its not shocking that the dipshit-in-chief would buy into it.
Butter compliments a good bagle better than anything else, but I'm not going to fault the people who don't particularly care about the bagle and just don't want the shame of eating a tub of cream cheese by hand in public, you do you.
Is this slop?
That's pig logic.
Innocent people get found guilty all the time, and even if you're not, a long trial is expensive and never going to convince haters he's innocent.
Do you not remember covid? Your treatlerites rioted in Montréal and tried to do a J6 over the most tepid restrictions. The ones jerking off over a romantic idea of fighting a war aren't prepared to spend years living without the lifestyle they're accustomed to and have themselves and their families randomly imprisoned or murdered by the evil empire they've served so faithfully. You'd be closer to the conditions of the IRA than Vietnam or Iran, except even they had a history of genocides to radicalize people.
See I always interpreted it as a way to get "moderate republicans" on board; triangulation tells them that if they move their policies to the right, then moderates who are afraid of good polucy will vote for them. I remember Obama talking about how not free his healthcare plan was, repeating "skin in the game" dozens of times.
A lot of soups are served witg chopsticks.
Wait he got shot on 9/10? God if the shooter had just waited 1 day.
Where you get the funds is irrelevant to the conversation, I am trying to understand the mind of somebody who genuinely believes complicated, means-tested tax breaks is better policy than literally just giving people checks with your party's name on it.
I assumed this was like cable-news poisoned boomers who like free healthcare and not haulling their neighbors off to concentration camps and not blowing up school children in Iran, but had it drilled into their head that complicated, means-tested healthcare for the deserving is more feasible, and having ICE politely escorting their neighbors into a van out of view is more realistic, and waging the war more competently is electable.
But someone who genuinely wants the enshittifed-until-they-help-nobody versions of good policies is baffling to me.
Who downvoted this? Is there some secret contingent who hate cash but love complicated tax breaks?
Steam itself is cool in the way it'll let you use the lan to transfer files between pcs.
I don't think you can say that if you've never been invaded/occupied by a superior army.
Maybe come over to vietnam and go to some museums or talk to some people if you want to know what asym warfare is like.
No innocent person has ever not wanted to go to court, due to the fear of miscarriage of justice or the perception of people like Knock_knock_Lemmy_in.
They still have Toys R Us in China.
Western media did a lot of nazi propaganda, from portraying them as more competent, disciplined, and technologically advanced than the allies to the "clean wehrmacht" to asiatic hordes myths.
Its not shocking that the dipshit-in-chief would buy into it.
Yup, no innocent person has ever been to court.
Before the end of WWII, the typical newspaper was 80% kanji.
Butter compliments a good bagle better than anything else, but I'm not going to fault the people who don't particularly care about the bagle and just don't want the shame of eating a tub of cream cheese by hand in public, you do you.
Why not just ask an artist to make the flyer?
When I was at a zoo, I don't remember where, they had AI-generated posters featuring animals that they had in the zoo.
Total land area: 9,093,507
You are counting ocean as part of Canada, a thing not represented on maps.
Imagine being this condescending and wrong.
Well yes, Canada is larger if you count the ocean as part of Canada lmao