Nielsen used to have quite respectable leading man career before AIrplane. People were legit shocked when he played Dr. Rumack because he never seemed to be the guy with the comedy chops. And then it became his whole thing.
no prob. sometimes i like to post a bit more cringe stuff because it is so "off the deep end" you need to see to believe it. I guess I need to be a bit more direct in the headlines
because it is "lo and behold! entitled rich people seem to have negative quantities of clue!". Sometimes it is important in life to have a laugh. This article is laughable. That's it.
well, its Esquire - not exactly a place for quality research. it is more of visiting a concentration camp for the priviliged and marvelling at their entitled cluelessness. i thought it was quite apparent in of itself but seems like it wasn't
arched backs been a thing since late 40s but it was more of an artistic nude thing that was later utilized in Playboy via Casilli, Posar and Hooker but it was fancy - but then the next gen of smut came in and made arched backs a weapon of mass destruction - photographers like Suze Randall, Nobuyoshi Araki, Bettina Rheims and Helmut Newton
the good/bad ratio of movies is actually quite steady across different eras - a solid 20/80 most of the time. however, you won't find the majority of bad movies preceding the home physical releases so the contrast between the classics and potboilers feels more drastic.
Well, it is still an adaptation of quite intense Shakespeare play
50s Gabo was basically mixtape Wayne - dude was busting out absolutely unexpected and uneven compositional choices and made it look easy
Yeah!
he was a known commodity that showed up here and there but not really a household name before Airplane
Nielsen used to have quite respectable leading man career before AIrplane. People were legit shocked when he played Dr. Rumack because he never seemed to be the guy with the comedy chops. And then it became his whole thing.
YAY!
no prob. sometimes i like to post a bit more cringe stuff because it is so "off the deep end" you need to see to believe it. I guess I need to be a bit more direct in the headlines
because it is "lo and behold! entitled rich people seem to have negative quantities of clue!". Sometimes it is important in life to have a laugh. This article is laughable. That's it.
duh. Esquire cringe is a genre.
well, its Esquire - not exactly a place for quality research. it is more of visiting a concentration camp for the priviliged and marvelling at their entitled cluelessness. i thought it was quite apparent in of itself but seems like it wasn't
yeah
fixed
you mean Dazzle Camouflage? That's World War 1.
maybe
yup
arched backs been a thing since late 40s but it was more of an artistic nude thing that was later utilized in Playboy via Casilli, Posar and Hooker but it was fancy - but then the next gen of smut came in and made arched backs a weapon of mass destruction - photographers like Suze Randall, Nobuyoshi Araki, Bettina Rheims and Helmut Newton
the good/bad ratio of movies is actually quite steady across different eras - a solid 20/80 most of the time. however, you won't find the majority of bad movies preceding the home physical releases so the contrast between the classics and potboilers feels more drastic.
the worst
unfortunately
fact