"If I had a horde of money I'd try to make it an ever bigger horde so I could tell people what to do."
Yes, that exact attitude is the problem with billionaires and why simply being a billionaire is a sign of mental illness, because people without a hording disorder will fuck off long before they get to a billion.
Right, but you said they insisted they wanted the billion. I'd want the billion too, but if I had 50 million I wouldn't be complaining that I didn't have a billion.
If you gave me the choice between 50 million and a billion I'd take a billion too; but if you gave me 50 million no one would hear from me again as I would quit my job, move somewhere quiet, and keep to myself.
It's okay guys, Trump just signed an executive order renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America. Now that the more important business is out of the way I'm sure fixing this is next on his to-do list.
This is an "every accusation is a confession" situation isn't it? Can't even call an obvious insult an insult but will accuse others of arguing in bad faith.
I addressed your strawman claims. I both addressed your argument that "not everyone is altruistic" and expanded on why your anecdote does undermine your argument.
This is just another attempt to not defend a weak argument, which could also be achieved be just not replying. This whole attitude of "I could totally defend my argument, I just don't want to. You need to prove yourself worthy of having me defend it" is not a good look for you or your argument.
If you have a good argument, let your argument stand. When people don't have a good argument they stand on insults.
who is no longer willing to repeat himself by restating the things he already said that were ignored and mischaracterized
So instead of defending their argument they're insulting the people who disagree with them to try to make them go away? That is exactly what I said. If you think the counter argument is invalid to the point that you're not going to address it you could just not reply, it's even easier than trying to insult the person and making your argument look weak as a result.
It's a natural extension of what you posted.
That's what I thought, but here we are.
"If I had a horde of money I'd try to make it an ever bigger horde so I could tell people what to do."
Yes, that exact attitude is the problem with billionaires and why simply being a billionaire is a sign of mental illness, because people without a hording disorder will fuck off long before they get to a billion.
Right, but you said they insisted they wanted the billion. I'd want the billion too, but if I had 50 million I wouldn't be complaining that I didn't have a billion.
Well considering my individual taxes are such an insufficient portion of my governments total spending I shouldn't have to pay them at all then.
It's hoarding. It's never enough to have a lot of money, they need to have all the money. Being a billionaire is a significant sign of mental illness.
If you gave me the choice between 50 million and a billion I'd take a billion too; but if you gave me 50 million no one would hear from me again as I would quit my job, move somewhere quiet, and keep to myself.
Okay, who is the leader of "Terror"? Did Terror surrender? Was any sort of peace treaty signed? Or is the war on going?
His memory only lasts 5 minutes, so he's been thinking about it for as long as he can remember.
And "AI" has 'intelligence' right in the title. What's your point?
You people are hypocrites. It's "all violence is bad" and then you want to call cops to inflict violence.
Why do you have harsher criticisms for me than for the guy screaming "I've killed lots of motherfuckers like you and I'm going to kill more!"
It's okay guys, Trump just signed an executive order renaming Lake Ontario to Lake America. Now that the more important business is out of the way I'm sure fixing this is next on his to-do list.
Call the police so that they can do the state-santioned violence? Violence is still going to happen.
Tell that to the Allied soldiers from WW2
It's easier to take on the risks when you're already rich from inherited wealth.
And unfit for the pubic to interact with.
This is an "every accusation is a confession" situation isn't it? Can't even call an obvious insult an insult but will accuse others of arguing in bad faith.
Said while wasting your time posting anything but an actual argument.
I addressed your strawman claims. I both addressed your argument that "not everyone is altruistic" and expanded on why your anecdote does undermine your argument.
This is just another attempt to not defend a weak argument, which could also be achieved be just not replying. This whole attitude of "I could totally defend my argument, I just don't want to. You need to prove yourself worthy of having me defend it" is not a good look for you or your argument.
If you have a good argument, let your argument stand. When people don't have a good argument they stand on insults.
So instead of defending their argument they're insulting the people who disagree with them to try to make them go away? That is exactly what I said. If you think the counter argument is invalid to the point that you're not going to address it you could just not reply, it's even easier than trying to insult the person and making your argument look weak as a result.