Wasn't he really weird when it came to describing a genocide as a genocide because the numbers where a bit low. I always found him to be a very odd person.
He acts in a very quasi enlightened way similar to the most snarky liberals or "enlighten centrists". Never understood the hype around him
The majority of people agree that immigration enforcement exists. We did evolve from Apes and still have some primitive tribal instinct left over.
However, a lot of people don't like the way ICE operates. The lack of judicial oversight means that if an ICE operative decides to shoot someone for the sake of it (which has been documented), there is no chance for them to be held accountable.
Nick Adams is someone that seems to have accepted his side is full of weirdo people who are wrong about everything but decided to go with the pay or something
"You can respect a person while saying they shouldn't be in a place."
"This person is self-evidently in this place illegally, they should be tried and ejected"
On behalf of the queer community this sounds really bad. I've seen similar rhetorical lines a lot, typically to defend the removal of queer media and other forms of expression.
I have never seen these be used to argue anything good.
There is a difference between the more liberal "enlightened" enforcement and the more brutal (and much worse) fascist enforcement. But the liberal apparatus (while comparatively considerably better) was still never just
Ahhh makes sense, wondered what happened. Surprised the app loaded
Labour isn't a religious cult but I get you
Wasn't he really weird when it came to describing a genocide as a genocide because the numbers where a bit low. I always found him to be a very odd person.
He acts in a very quasi enlightened way similar to the most snarky liberals or "enlighten centrists". Never understood the hype around him
It's odd that Japan never came to terms with "being the bad guys" in the way Germany did
TBF Starmer was already in rough waters
Considering this is a nerdy neuroscience person this could be very unfortunate luck?
It seems like it's probably a bot account that happened upon a misogynistic comic, probably accidental
I think I threw up a little
The majority of people agree that immigration enforcement exists. We did evolve from Apes and still have some primitive tribal instinct left over.
However, a lot of people don't like the way ICE operates. The lack of judicial oversight means that if an ICE operative decides to shoot someone for the sake of it (which has been documented), there is no chance for them to be held accountable.
I think the person saying it knew the irony
Nick Adams is someone that seems to have accepted his side is full of weirdo people who are wrong about everything but decided to go with the pay or something
A kid said 67 badly
Hold delete on the previous page
A better comparison would be our 21
I mean fair, also helbent in the destruction of America
Have you read their Bio? It explains everything.
In the UK and we talk about people smugglers like we don't have a navy that could provide the transport ourselves
"You can respect a person while saying they shouldn't be in a place."
"This person is self-evidently in this place illegally, they should be tried and ejected"
On behalf of the queer community this sounds really bad. I've seen similar rhetorical lines a lot, typically to defend the removal of queer media and other forms of expression.
I have never seen these be used to argue anything good.
There is a difference between the more liberal "enlightened" enforcement and the more brutal (and much worse) fascist enforcement. But the liberal apparatus (while comparatively considerably better) was still never just
Good points. I just wanted to add even Pre-Trump the fact people need to go to court to argue their right to live in a country is stupid.
The immigration process should be nothing but a security check and be given ID in a civilized society
Didn't he believe white people were created by an evil scientist. (As someone on the paler side I get it but still)