I don't need a thing from you. I’m just calling out your dishonest bullshit.
First, you smugly projected pedophilia onto the original commenter when you were the only person fucked up enough to bring the word into this thread. When I called you out on that projection, you immediately moved the goalposts to 'incest spectrums' to distract from your mistake. And now you're pulling this passive-aggressive 'wHaT dO yOu NeEd FrOm Me' act to pretend I'm the weird one for calling out your bullshit.
Instead of just admitting you misread the post and apologizing for throwing around absurd accusations, you double down with logical fallacies and play victim. I don't need anything from you- just pointing out that projecting creepy shit onto strangers and playing dumb when called out doesn't make you look smart
But that's a completely different topic. I didn't argue that the original comment didn't insinuate incest. We were talking about pedophilia, because you pulled it out of nothing, because the original comment didn't imply that in any way.
Actually, your mind DID go to pedophilia immediately, because the comment you replied to didn't mention any ages. But you saw the word "children" and immediately thought of pedophilia.
Children can be any age... I am a 30+ child of my parents
You can have an anti-American or anti-EU stance without being pro-Russian. Russia’s current government and its actions are the embodiment of evil, and anyone who supports or justifies those actions in any way is a bad person or not in their right mind
I'm not OP, but my wife unfortunately has a similar problem with editing PDFs.
She works as a special education teacher, and one of her regular tasks is to modify tests to adapt them to a specific child’s disability (e.g., simplifying the content of questions or using less distracting images so that the test actually assesses the child’s knowledge, rather than their ability to analyze complex sentences or their ability to concentrate)
The problem is that most subject teachers do not prepare tests themselves, but rather send her PDFs that they downloaded from the internet or received from the textbook publisher.
If my wife needs to change the wording of two sentences, remove one image, and perhaps switch the order of two questions, editing the PDF will take her 10 minutes compared to the several hours of work it would take to rewrite the entire test from scratch.
This is probably a very unusual use case, but I’m sure there are a thousand other unusual use cases that legitimately can’t be handled any other way, so holding off on a recommendation for the OP until they explain themselves is a bit wierd
Judging code quality by use of LLM in a documentation and commit messages is weird.
While I write all of my code myself and I'm against vibe coding etc., there is one place where I let a LLM write for me: readmes, commit messages and Javadoc comments.
I know how to write code but at the same time I'm shit at both my native language and even more so at English. So I let Language Models write natural language texts for me and just fix them when necessary. My documentation is more clear, grammatically correct and more detailed than in any of my previous projects, and I can focus on writing code.
And I wouldn't say "No one does that in a project they're building for themselves". I do that for projects that only I will ever see, and OP shared his project with others, so it's great that he included a clear documentation
Obviously an app removing ads from YouTube wouldn't be published to the official store
I don't need a thing from you. I’m just calling out your dishonest bullshit.
First, you smugly projected pedophilia onto the original commenter when you were the only person fucked up enough to bring the word into this thread. When I called you out on that projection, you immediately moved the goalposts to 'incest spectrums' to distract from your mistake. And now you're pulling this passive-aggressive 'wHaT dO yOu NeEd FrOm Me' act to pretend I'm the weird one for calling out your bullshit.
Instead of just admitting you misread the post and apologizing for throwing around absurd accusations, you double down with logical fallacies and play victim. I don't need anything from you- just pointing out that projecting creepy shit onto strangers and playing dumb when called out doesn't make you look smart
But that's a completely different topic. I didn't argue that the original comment didn't insinuate incest. We were talking about pedophilia, because you pulled it out of nothing, because the original comment didn't imply that in any way.
Actually, your mind DID go to pedophilia immediately, because the comment you replied to didn't mention any ages. But you saw the word "children" and immediately thought of pedophilia.
Children can be any age... I am a 30+ child of my parents
You can have an anti-American or anti-EU stance without being pro-Russian. Russia’s current government and its actions are the embodiment of evil, and anyone who supports or justifies those actions in any way is a bad person or not in their right mind
No one in their right mind is pro-Russian
I'm not OP, but my wife unfortunately has a similar problem with editing PDFs.
She works as a special education teacher, and one of her regular tasks is to modify tests to adapt them to a specific child’s disability (e.g., simplifying the content of questions or using less distracting images so that the test actually assesses the child’s knowledge, rather than their ability to analyze complex sentences or their ability to concentrate)
The problem is that most subject teachers do not prepare tests themselves, but rather send her PDFs that they downloaded from the internet or received from the textbook publisher.
If my wife needs to change the wording of two sentences, remove one image, and perhaps switch the order of two questions, editing the PDF will take her 10 minutes compared to the several hours of work it would take to rewrite the entire test from scratch.
This is probably a very unusual use case, but I’m sure there are a thousand other unusual use cases that legitimately can’t be handled any other way, so holding off on a recommendation for the OP until they explain themselves is a bit wierd
Judging code quality by use of LLM in a documentation and commit messages is weird.
While I write all of my code myself and I'm against vibe coding etc., there is one place where I let a LLM write for me: readmes, commit messages and Javadoc comments.
I know how to write code but at the same time I'm shit at both my native language and even more so at English. So I let Language Models write natural language texts for me and just fix them when necessary. My documentation is more clear, grammatically correct and more detailed than in any of my previous projects, and I can focus on writing code.
And I wouldn't say "No one does that in a project they're building for themselves". I do that for projects that only I will ever see, and OP shared his project with others, so it's great that he included a clear documentation
Fuck russia