HeroHelck

u/HeroHelck@lemmy.dbzer0.com
10 posts · 161 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

Mushishi, it's just so relaxing without being devoid of tension and humanity. I know it has a bit of a reputation as a "namedrop" anime that people profess to like to appear cultured, but honestly it's simply very very good and pretty unique.

Who cares dog, it's a number on a silly website it literally does not matter. Upvotes are equally toxic in that sense, you determine your value based on the votes of others? That's just treating your own mind as if it was a stranger.

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/privacy · 3 pts · 38d

Eh, I can not say that I agree that people's attachment to privacy is purely a matter of the current status quo. I think a human desire for privacy, at least in some contexts, is innate. Sure, I'll grant that it's extremity in the modern era is due to the oppressive and abusive state, but I think people have an certain in-born aversion to being overly judged and observed.

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/privacy · 2 pts · 38d

Well, I simply cannot agree that anything that would notably increase human misery could be considered optimal in the first place. So I suppose on first facts we simply disagree.

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/privacy · 3 pts · 38d

Well let's consider that logical validity, while useful for objective facts and conditions, might not be a good a benchmark for things that humans are emotionally attached to? Is it an unreasonable thing to point out that most humans simply do not (and will not) use the formal system of logic, even if trained in it, as the basis on which they emotionally relate to their experience? What I am trying to say is just that, while it might be logically valid it is not emotionally valid, and that really does matter. Would you enforce a world that is reasonable and logical, but makes the people who live in it uncomfortable and miserable?

on *Permanently Deleted* · c/privacy · 2 pts · 38d

most argumentation from your side is just common trolling or logical fallacies, which makes me think that I'm correct.

This, itself, is a logical fallacy. A fallacious argument is not "incorrect" or "wrong" it's just invalid, meaning it does not meet the formal requirements of logical validity, not much else. Things can be both fallacious and correct.

I understand where the critics are coming from, this isn't making it on to my purely hypothetical top 5 albums of the year list, but I enjoyed it well enough. It just lacks that certain "wow" factor ultimately.

How the hell have I never heard of this? This is excellent, this is perfect, this is what I want from thrash and no that's not the half a fifth of Knob Creek talking.

I keep telling myself I don't really like Swedeath, but then I keep jamming out to every swedeath band put in front of me. Maybe I just have brain damage, I dunno.