These look like something my wife (shes a teacher) has in our kitchen with her stuff. if this is what they are imma bust into them when I get home. Idk how I missed the kites and darts as a fan of Martin Gardner
Could the Trump admin please stop doing the plot to Infinite Jest, I hate that book and I know they never read it because they don't read and also noone has read it
Its not quite that big. If you're on the ground under it and reach up you'll touch it. Probably 8 feet across at the widest point and 12 or so feet long? Its not collossal. But it feels much bigger in the room, so my measurements could be all off
I've spent hours and hours in this room! I've laid underneath it. The walls bow inward. The pic doesn't do justice to how huge it feels in person. In this room, there is only barrell
So, you're saying that the image was presented multiple times and the AI produced different results? Like I see where the image was shared twice/multi times, the first time it says that the data is misleading, and the second time it seems to say that the data could be true. Sort of the conciliatory tone that air models take.
So you're saying google reports like 85% accuracy, but that's demonstrably untrue, which could form the basis for legal action against them? The fact that I stopped reading 100 pages in hurt my comprehension cuz the image is reintroduced around page 120.
Another thing I was confused about, is how many "voices" are present in this doc? There's the user, the ai output (is this consistently the small text?) And then the larger text that seems to be an "explaining voice" (standard size text) in some ways, but at the beginning of the doc it seemed like it was the ai output, which may have been confusing me as well
There is a particular class characteristic to it, Marx calls it "lumpen proletariat" which is a term he abandons by the time he wrote Capital vol 1, but which forms part of his really important social analysis in The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon.
The objective in doing a class analysis is not to sort people into categories in order to deal with them abstractly (this is capitalist politics), but to try and understand actual conditions in order to change them. Sex workers and gang members reproduce the same fundamental relations we see under capitalism. There is an exploiting minority and an exploited majority functioning within these occupations. I've met some self-identified gang-members, and admittedly their consciousness seems much closer to that of an exploiting petite-bourgeois, and this is true of many sex workers. But I've also met self-reported sex-workers (not professionally) at protests and pickets, particularly where feminist, body autonomy, and lgbt+ rights struggles are the organizing issue.
However, the Black Panthers, the Rainbow Coalition, the Young Lords, etc., were very successful in organizing these troubled parts of society into radical revolutionaries that were unambiguously allies of liberation struggles. The fact is, many people who end up in gangs, or as sex workers, find them selves in extremely precarious positions in which there are a limited number of opportunities available to them, in which they may make bad decisions in order to survive.
This isn't much different than the conditions we all experience as workers, but social divisions of labor, often determined across lines of socio economic, race, gender, etc., can absolutely afford or limit the options available to people. If society afforded healthcare, mental and social healthcare, social safety nets, reduced predatory policing, affordable public housing, access to jobs, etc, to everyone; these programs objectively reduce the causes and severity of crime. That's because it makes it so people don't have to live in desperation and desolation. The fact is, sex work and gangs, etc., are a structural part of capitalism. Would abolishing capitalism make them disappear? Probably not at first, but I think that a mass movement or society that is built by and for the workers, against the exploitation of capital is the best chance at creating a safe and rational society.
Capitalism produces crime in order to keep people afraid of it, so that the political class can instill hatred and fear in the masses, which sow divisions among us. One of the best first steps we can take to creating a safer and more rational society is to reject the premises that capitalism uses to divide us. Yes, that may include holding some contradictory views like "sex workers are workers" but guess what, the logic of capitalism is deeply contradictory and justifies worse forms of violence on much larger scale than some gang violence. I'd love to see an end to drug cartels and the extreme violence of them, but guess what? They're capitalists too.
In the USA the most dangerous job, is agricultural jobs. The fact that these jobs are largely done by immigrants, minorities, and the severely poor and exploited reads its exclusion as a little problematic.
Also, sex workers are workers, and I'm sure that occupation is also very dangerous, but because it is prohibited by law, I don't think good stats exist, though IMO worth mentioning
Google says that using AI Gemini, they conducted experiments on 1,245,892 cognitive dependencies and achieved a high success rate of 84.21%.
Where is this stated in the file you linked? Its in the title (was it renamed?) but not in the content. The file looks like an experiment where a user provides hostile, lets say "conspiratorial" prompts to the AI, and then the responses come back addressing the user's remarks.
The image on this post, from the report, is provided by the "conspiratorial user" as a way of providing evidence of a conspiracy to the AI. The conspiratorial user provides other images too.
I really only got through the first like 100 pages (its mostly translated in other languages and I only read english) so I'd appreciate some direction, but it seems like you're trying to pass off this image as evidence of a conspiracy within google, which contradicts the whole point of the report you provided.
Like I'm not for AI, I'm highly skeptical of the tech and downright opposed to the way it is being used for military and mass surveillance, which is the primary motivator for the massive infrastructure investments being made, while people can't afford healthcare and food or housing. I live within a couple miles of where these data centers are being built, and they are a fucking blight.
But isn't it a problem to combat misinfo with misinfo? Sorry if that's inaccurate, but that's just how it seems to me. Representing the report as something that, it really seems like it isn't, at least not from my perspective. But perhaps I'm looking at the wrong part of the report. Like AI is being used for political and economic control of one class over another class. They're using it to harm our comprehension of fact, which seems to be the point you are alleging, and something I agree with. But then, we have to be able to support that case, and frankly I don't think the report you provided or the way I perceive it being represented in this post, accomplishes that aim.
These look like something my wife (shes a teacher) has in our kitchen with her stuff. if this is what they are imma bust into them when I get home. Idk how I missed the kites and darts as a fan of Martin Gardner
All cause and effect is barrel
Could the Trump admin please stop doing the plot to Infinite Jest, I hate that book and I know they never read it because they don't read and also noone has read it
Calling Trotsky right-wing is fucking brain dead
Its not quite that big. If you're on the ground under it and reach up you'll touch it. Probably 8 feet across at the widest point and 12 or so feet long? Its not collossal. But it feels much bigger in the room, so my measurements could be all off
The room is part of the installation, the walls slant and bow slightly to make the barrel feel even more imposing
I've spent hours and hours in this room! I've laid underneath it. The walls bow inward. The pic doesn't do justice to how huge it feels in person. In this room, there is only barrell
I'll continue to look it over, thanks for sharing
Thanks!
So, you're saying that the image was presented multiple times and the AI produced different results? Like I see where the image was shared twice/multi times, the first time it says that the data is misleading, and the second time it seems to say that the data could be true. Sort of the conciliatory tone that air models take.
So you're saying google reports like 85% accuracy, but that's demonstrably untrue, which could form the basis for legal action against them? The fact that I stopped reading 100 pages in hurt my comprehension cuz the image is reintroduced around page 120.
Another thing I was confused about, is how many "voices" are present in this doc? There's the user, the ai output (is this consistently the small text?) And then the larger text that seems to be an "explaining voice" (standard size text) in some ways, but at the beginning of the doc it seemed like it was the ai output, which may have been confusing me as well
There is a particular class characteristic to it, Marx calls it "lumpen proletariat" which is a term he abandons by the time he wrote Capital vol 1, but which forms part of his really important social analysis in The 18th Brumaire of Louis Napoleon.
The objective in doing a class analysis is not to sort people into categories in order to deal with them abstractly (this is capitalist politics), but to try and understand actual conditions in order to change them. Sex workers and gang members reproduce the same fundamental relations we see under capitalism. There is an exploiting minority and an exploited majority functioning within these occupations. I've met some self-identified gang-members, and admittedly their consciousness seems much closer to that of an exploiting petite-bourgeois, and this is true of many sex workers. But I've also met self-reported sex-workers (not professionally) at protests and pickets, particularly where feminist, body autonomy, and lgbt+ rights struggles are the organizing issue.
However, the Black Panthers, the Rainbow Coalition, the Young Lords, etc., were very successful in organizing these troubled parts of society into radical revolutionaries that were unambiguously allies of liberation struggles. The fact is, many people who end up in gangs, or as sex workers, find them selves in extremely precarious positions in which there are a limited number of opportunities available to them, in which they may make bad decisions in order to survive.
This isn't much different than the conditions we all experience as workers, but social divisions of labor, often determined across lines of socio economic, race, gender, etc., can absolutely afford or limit the options available to people. If society afforded healthcare, mental and social healthcare, social safety nets, reduced predatory policing, affordable public housing, access to jobs, etc, to everyone; these programs objectively reduce the causes and severity of crime. That's because it makes it so people don't have to live in desperation and desolation. The fact is, sex work and gangs, etc., are a structural part of capitalism. Would abolishing capitalism make them disappear? Probably not at first, but I think that a mass movement or society that is built by and for the workers, against the exploitation of capital is the best chance at creating a safe and rational society.
Capitalism produces crime in order to keep people afraid of it, so that the political class can instill hatred and fear in the masses, which sow divisions among us. One of the best first steps we can take to creating a safer and more rational society is to reject the premises that capitalism uses to divide us. Yes, that may include holding some contradictory views like "sex workers are workers" but guess what, the logic of capitalism is deeply contradictory and justifies worse forms of violence on much larger scale than some gang violence. I'd love to see an end to drug cartels and the extreme violence of them, but guess what? They're capitalists too.
Legal capitalism needs illegal capitalism in order to function
In the USA the most dangerous job, is agricultural jobs. The fact that these jobs are largely done by immigrants, minorities, and the severely poor and exploited reads its exclusion as a little problematic.
Also, sex workers are workers, and I'm sure that occupation is also very dangerous, but because it is prohibited by law, I don't think good stats exist, though IMO worth mentioning
Where is this stated in the file you linked? Its in the title (was it renamed?) but not in the content. The file looks like an experiment where a user provides hostile, lets say "conspiratorial" prompts to the AI, and then the responses come back addressing the user's remarks.
The image on this post, from the report, is provided by the "conspiratorial user" as a way of providing evidence of a conspiracy to the AI. The conspiratorial user provides other images too.
I really only got through the first like 100 pages (its mostly translated in other languages and I only read english) so I'd appreciate some direction, but it seems like you're trying to pass off this image as evidence of a conspiracy within google, which contradicts the whole point of the report you provided.
Like I'm not for AI, I'm highly skeptical of the tech and downright opposed to the way it is being used for military and mass surveillance, which is the primary motivator for the massive infrastructure investments being made, while people can't afford healthcare and food or housing. I live within a couple miles of where these data centers are being built, and they are a fucking blight.
But isn't it a problem to combat misinfo with misinfo? Sorry if that's inaccurate, but that's just how it seems to me. Representing the report as something that, it really seems like it isn't, at least not from my perspective. But perhaps I'm looking at the wrong part of the report. Like AI is being used for political and economic control of one class over another class. They're using it to harm our comprehension of fact, which seems to be the point you are alleging, and something I agree with. But then, we have to be able to support that case, and frankly I don't think the report you provided or the way I perceive it being represented in this post, accomplishes that aim.
Free Palestine
Art of the Deal
A desperate attempt at happiness meal