It kind of sounds like regular programming using libraries but with fancy names for everything. And nowhere does it seem to explain how anything really works just that it's super easy somehow.
So what exactly is the issue? Have Mercedes and RedBull found a way to work around the old compression regulations by expansion of the material and the new regulations enable that same approach and the other teams wanted a different approach?
Decomposing bodies are not nice to look at and since many people that die were sick you don't want to have their remains around spreading illnesses.
How the universe was created is what scientists are trying to find out. Also there are a lot of things that exists without a creator. For example puddles in the street. No one put them there. They exist because of physical processes that lead to their creation.
The special thing about federated social media is that if you don't like something about one specific instance you can go to another instance or even create your own and still be part of the whole system. You're not stuck with some leadership that you have to endure. Instead you can be your own boss or choose a nice place to stay.
I think all the other things that people like about it, like "no algorithm", come naturally from this fact but are not inherent to the system.
Looks good indeed. However it does not yet seem to support embedding Markdown files within other Markdown files with the ![[]] syntax so my current system of having topical notes that contain subtopical ones does not work. But it's nice know that there is a FOSS system that can work with a standard Obsidian Vault.
It's my main browser for a while now and I really like the vertical tabs and tab unloading which saves a lot of ram compared to regular firefox. Otherwise I think the split modes and the peeking feature are nice but I don't use them that much.
So I'm a total noob when it comes to business systems and I have never used ActiveDirectory or group policies, but wasn't Linux or rather Unix originally designed as a system for many users on one big machine/network? Why is it so difficult for businesses to manage permissions and group settings on a large amount of devices? What does Microsoft/Windows do so much better there?
Just replace every icon for modern software with a robot head representing AI that was crammed in there. Maybe adding different colors is also fine.
It kind of sounds like regular programming using libraries but with fancy names for everything. And nowhere does it seem to explain how anything really works just that it's super easy somehow.
They'll probably at least try since they see bigger chances to win compared to the polar bears that they had to face previously
the south pole actually has land under the ice so he'd have to move from north to south I guess
Die meisten Leute haben halt auch noch nie ernsthaft LibreOffice oder andere FOSS software ausprobiert und darauf auch irgendwie keinen Bock.
So what exactly is the issue? Have Mercedes and RedBull found a way to work around the old compression regulations by expansion of the material and the new regulations enable that same approach and the other teams wanted a different approach?
ICH KANN DICH NICHT HÖREN WENN DU SO LEISE SCHREIBST, AROOO!!!
Decomposing bodies are not nice to look at and since many people that die were sick you don't want to have their remains around spreading illnesses.
How the universe was created is what scientists are trying to find out. Also there are a lot of things that exists without a creator. For example puddles in the street. No one put them there. They exist because of physical processes that lead to their creation.
France
France
Aha, kannst du das genauer ausführen?
The special thing about federated social media is that if you don't like something about one specific instance you can go to another instance or even create your own and still be part of the whole system. You're not stuck with some leadership that you have to endure. Instead you can be your own boss or choose a nice place to stay.
I think all the other things that people like about it, like "no algorithm", come naturally from this fact but are not inherent to the system.
... irgendwas mit in 6 Monaten werden alle ihren Job verlieren...
Looks good indeed. However it does not yet seem to support embedding Markdown files within other Markdown files with the ![[]] syntax so my current system of having topical notes that contain subtopical ones does not work. But it's nice know that there is a FOSS system that can work with a standard Obsidian Vault.
I'm just gonna leave this here: A better colormap
And Julia!
It's my main browser for a while now and I really like the vertical tabs and tab unloading which saves a lot of ram compared to regular firefox. Otherwise I think the split modes and the peeking feature are nice but I don't use them that much.
And there is probably no simple way to set up a system that would function in a way that Linux needs I guess?
So I'm a total noob when it comes to business systems and I have never used ActiveDirectory or group policies, but wasn't Linux or rather Unix originally designed as a system for many users on one big machine/network? Why is it so difficult for businesses to manage permissions and group settings on a large amount of devices? What does Microsoft/Windows do so much better there?
Why do all the nazis seem to like Russia so much? Weren't we told that Russia is fighting nazis in Ukraine or could that have been a lie?