I think that's a valid point. Note, the API is structured: /file/key1/key2/... if you want to access [key1][key2] in file.json. Hence, you can't have folder paths in the filename (because that adds an additional slash). However, perhaps with escaping characters it might become possible, so I made an issue to fix this 👍
Btw, I appreciate you taking the time to investigate and understand my side project. It really helps. Happy 2026! (in my timezone we're almost there).
Thanks for checking my project out. In the readme I state it's for 'small personal projects' where you want to get something quickly. However, "widly insecure" seems a bit much? If you use it for storing data that has no privacy (like public blog posts, and their comments)?
I personally don't know shove, but on a high-level it seems similar yes. I do note it hasn't had updates for 10 years, so I'm not sure how usable it is.
But nice find! I will see if there's anything I can learn from shove.
Thanks for your compliment. will do!
I did this! My image is available here: https://hub.docker.com/r/tiemster/emmer
I think that's a valid point. Note, the API is structured: /file/key1/key2/... if you want to access [key1][key2] in file.json. Hence, you can't have folder paths in the filename (because that adds an additional slash). However, perhaps with escaping characters it might become possible, so I made an issue to fix this 👍
Btw, I appreciate you taking the time to investigate and understand my side project. It really helps. Happy 2026! (in my timezone we're almost there).
Thanks! I never had much success there, but who knows. I will create the docker image, that is a good idea in general :)
Thanks for checking my project out. In the readme I state it's for 'small personal projects' where you want to get something quickly. However, "widly insecure" seems a bit much? If you use it for storing data that has no privacy (like public blog posts, and their comments)?
I personally don't know shove, but on a high-level it seems similar yes. I do note it hasn't had updates for 10 years, so I'm not sure how usable it is.
But nice find! I will see if there's anything I can learn from shove.
With licenses, I don't think the goal is to create one universal standard. More options is typically better.
https://github.com/TimoKats/emmer
I'll check if the link works btw, the title should go to github. Do you like the idea ? :)
I'm afraid that might be correct :( perhaps closing off software to the public will be the only way to prevent it from getting stolen
*neil peart...but yes very true
Not a lawyer, but I don't think so. there are licenses that extend existing licenses with that clause, like BSD NON-AI
tenfingers looks cool btw, hadn't heard of it yet. Is it your project?
If you have software using this license, feel free to share under this post :)