Good luck with it. I read your PDF. Let me know if you want any advice.
I'm not sure having no coaches is a good idea. A martial arts coach is a perfect example of "justified hierarchy". And you do mark skill disparities as one of the major issues you're facing.
Hamas has said that it has agreed to release all Israeli captives held in Gaza, both dead and alive, āin a manner that achievesā an end to Israelās war and a full Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza Strip.
It also said that it would hand over power in Gaza to a body of Palestinian technocrats.
...
Hamas has made it clear that it is not willing to accept several aspects of Trumpās plan, including an interim administration led by Trump and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
āWe will never accept anyone who is not Palestinian to control the Palestinians,ā Hamas senior official Mousa Abu Marzouk told Al Jazeera
Yes, Dahner is probably a good example of what I'm talking about: the conjunction of mistreatment and organic brain disorders. His parents denied scientists at Fresno permission to examine his brain before cremation, so we can't be sure exactly what was wrong with him, but we know he was an alcoholic and the son of a mentally ill mother.
Charles Whitman is another: beaten by his father, lost his brother to murder, plus a tumour on his amygdala.
The point the English professors are making is that the new generation of students see monsters entirely as victims of circumstances. It's an ideological belief.
It's a weird internet-meme that the monster is innocent. Internet-dwellers have been posting that 2018 tweet as confirmation, as though that supercedes the text.
But it is true that I am a wretch. I have murdered the lovely and the helpless; I have strangled the innocent as they slept and grasped to death his throat who never injured me or any other living thing. I have devoted my creator, the select specimen of all that is worthy of love and admiration among men, to misery; I have pursued him even to that irremediable ruin. There he lies, white and cold in death. You hate me, but your abhorrence cannot equal that with which I regard myself.
In this case, the sources were a professor of English at Exeter who wrote an intro to the book, and Mary Shelley expert Professor David Punter, of Bristol University.
The worst people in real life have both an abused background and an organic brain/genetic problem.
The monster's abnormal reaction to rejection (becoming a serial killer), I read that as he's probably got a bad brain/nature too. And why wouldn't he, given how he was made?
Frankenstein! you belong then to my enemyāto him towards whom I have sworn eternal revenge; you shall be my first victim.ā
The child still struggled and loaded me with epithets which carried despair to my heart; I grasped his throat to silence him, and in a moment he lay dead at my feet.
I gazed on my victim, and my heart swelled with exultation and hellish triumph; clapping my hands, I exclaimed, āI too can create desolation; my enemy is not invulnerable; this death will carry despair to him, and a thousand other miseries shall torment and destroy him
...but I didn't read it that as an accident. Imagine using that defense in a courtroom: "I wasn't trying to kill the child, I was trying to kidnap him for revenge. I killed him by accident when choking him to silence him." Especially given the physical mismatch of a huge heavyweight versus a tiny child.
As I said earlier, "I think the problem is the students are giving too much credence to the monsterās monologues"
"These are a bit shit!" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4P1r9MgilA&t=81
If you think this works, try it on a bag and report back.
Steel water bottle with one end narrowed to be a convenient handle ā
A fat water bottle can't be gripped. Bad handle = bad weapon ā
To state the obvious, it's not a worker doing that. It's Universal Studios.
It is not only possible, it's simple.
Good luck with it. I read your PDF. Let me know if you want any advice.
I'm not sure having no coaches is a good idea. A martial arts coach is a perfect example of "justified hierarchy". And you do mark skill disparities as one of the major issues you're facing.
::: spoiler šššššššš CONGRATULATIONS ON WATCHING SO MUCH TELEVISION!!!! (seriously, is that what you wanted?) :::
Guy who tweeted this doesn't fight.
How will they resist?
cat pictures
Shotgun to be specific
Hamas haven't "accepted" the plan
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/10/3/is-an-end-to-israels-war-on-gaza-finally-in-sight
Yes, Dahner is probably a good example of what I'm talking about: the conjunction of mistreatment and organic brain disorders. His parents denied scientists at Fresno permission to examine his brain before cremation, so we can't be sure exactly what was wrong with him, but we know he was an alcoholic and the son of a mentally ill mother.
Charles Whitman is another: beaten by his father, lost his brother to murder, plus a tumour on his amygdala.
The point the English professors are making is that the new generation of students see monsters entirely as victims of circumstances. It's an ideological belief.
It's a weird internet-meme that the monster is innocent. Internet-dwellers have been posting that 2018 tweet as confirmation, as though that supercedes the text.
Right, and that fits with what the profs are saying here: that modern sensibilities view monsters (even serial killers) as victims.
In this case, the sources were a professor of English at Exeter who wrote an intro to the book, and Mary Shelley expert Professor David Punter, of Bristol University.
http://archive.is/BEz2F
The worst people in real life have both an abused background and an organic brain/genetic problem.
The monster's abnormal reaction to rejection (becoming a serial killer), I read that as he's probably got a bad brain/nature too. And why wouldn't he, given how he was made?
You could....
...but I didn't read it that as an accident. Imagine using that defense in a courtroom: "I wasn't trying to kill the child, I was trying to kidnap him for revenge. I killed him by accident when choking him to silence him." Especially given the physical mismatch of a huge heavyweight versus a tiny child.
As I said earlier, "I think the problem is the students are giving too much credence to the monsterās monologues"
How do they work as journalists if they're illiterate?
What's the worst thing done to the monster, in your opinion?