Congrats on making it, something like this can be quite hard.
By the way: You should probably move from Telegram to something like Signal to get strong end-to-end encryption by default back. Telegram's secret chats aren't the default, are inconvenient to set up and cryptographically strange.
That's fun! I'm currently comming from Neovim to see if Emacs is for me. I've only really used Neovim for half a year and Emacs for less than a week so who knows? I've actually only been sent on this rollercoaster ride by JetBrains trying to sneak AI training data collection into IntelliJ almost a year ago, eventually being annoyed by how clanky Eclipse is. Am I annoyed by Neovim? No, not at all, I just want to see if I like Emacs even better.
Across the Mozilla Project and every organization in the Mozilla family, we pledge to support the Mozilla Manifesto in its activities. Specifically, we will:
build and enable open-source technologies and communities that support the Manifesto’s principles;
I've seen a Claude screenshot posted in a community of computer scientists where it “proved” P=NP through circular reference and cursed mathematics.
For context, P and NP are sets of problems. If an algorithm exists where the time it takes to determine if a solution to a problem is correct scales polinomially relative to its input size, it's in NP. If the time to solve the problem scales polinomially, it's also in P, a subset of NP.
The question now is if P = NP: Is every problem we can verify in polinomial time also solvable in polinomial time? We just don't know, although we think it probably isn't. But that's just a guess.
Matrix is only really enjoyable with unencrypted chats.
I have fairly recently switched phones. Now, a good number of older messenges fail to decrypt. Even when I don't switch devices, a group chat for a three day long event with a very small group already gave us lots of fun decryption errors. Oh, and I have this other fun group chat where Fluffy Chat constantly reminds me that people whose devices I haven't verified will be able to read my messenges every time I send something. Also, Matrix has coutless clients with different feature sets and I heard calls are a pain to ßet up.
Signal, on the other hand, just works. Federation and decentralization is obviously nice but a functional product is more importmant. I haven't had a chance to try XMPP unfortunately.
DuckDuckGo slightly alters your search results based on your reginon and so I couldn't reproduce this. Try advanced syntax with queries like +kate spellchecker or even "kate" spellchecker. Failing that, add terms you don't want to see (-ai, -"quillbot").
But is there any way I can get the dataset? If not, none of this is completely open source per OSI. The model itself is even advertised as “open-weight”, not open source.
Casually comparing a game company founder to a brutal dictator who started a devestating war and an industrialized genocide is as strech to say the least.
DNS leaks are not dramatic. There’s no attacker, no data center breach, no policy failure. Just code doing something its authors didn’t intend, quietly working against the protection users assumed they had.
This sounds AI generated. I suspect the entire article is. Some cases it explores I have heard of but I wouldn't trust AI to not make stuff up.
Ah, OK. I was hoping it would maybe do something clever like hash it and send a byte so the server can give it a small list of passwords to check locally but I guess they didn't bother…
I mean, it does seem to do something. I generated a random one and it told me it was safe. For now! The box then told me to get a password manager with a link to its own password managers article and set up 2FA. The password manager list is just a collection of affiliate links with filler text btw.
If someone wants to figure out what the site sends to figure this stuff out and if it's more than just rockyou.txt, go ahead.
LeechBlock NG isn't exactly what your'e looking for but it still may help. Of course, it'll have no effect if UBO and the DNS already shut everything off.
Good thing the details aren't actually details. It's a super short Tweet by ReactOS with celebratory screenshot and the acknowledgement that it still has bugs and crashes you wouldn't get on actual Windows. That's genuinely it.
That's actually a good idea if they're dealing with such campaigns. See it as the moderators (wo exist either way) directing their attention to places where violations are more likely to happen. Sure, DM monitoring sounds a bit intrusive, but admins reading your DMs was always a possibility and with the right user education, it shouldn't be an issue.
Congrats on making it, something like this can be quite hard.
By the way: You should probably move from Telegram to something like Signal to get strong end-to-end encryption by default back. Telegram's secret chats aren't the default, are inconvenient to set up and cryptographically strange.
That's fun! I'm currently comming from Neovim to see if Emacs is for me. I've only really used Neovim for half a year and Emacs for less than a week so who knows? I've actually only been sent on this rollercoaster ride by JetBrains trying to sneak AI training data collection into IntelliJ almost a year ago, eventually being annoyed by how clanky Eclipse is. Am I annoyed by Neovim? No, not at all, I just want to see if I like Emacs even better.
Could be the perfect opportunity to officially add compose support to Windows
Source: Mozilla Manifesto
I've seen a Claude screenshot posted in a community of computer scientists where it “proved” P=NP through circular reference and cursed mathematics.
For context, P and NP are sets of problems. If an algorithm exists where the time it takes to determine if a solution to a problem is correct scales polinomially relative to its input size, it's in NP. If the time to solve the problem scales polinomially, it's also in P, a subset of NP.
The question now is if P = NP: Is every problem we can verify in polinomial time also solvable in polinomial time? We just don't know, although we think it probably isn't. But that's just a guess.
So someone asked Claude and it came up with: https://fixupx.com/connacher_/status/2079541927553212471 which, to a maths person, is hillariously incorrect.
I just don't trust in AI's ability to reliably produce true statements.
Matrix is only really enjoyable with unencrypted chats.
I have fairly recently switched phones. Now, a good number of older messenges fail to decrypt. Even when I don't switch devices, a group chat for a three day long event with a very small group already gave us lots of fun decryption errors. Oh, and I have this other fun group chat where Fluffy Chat constantly reminds me that people whose devices I haven't verified will be able to read my messenges every time I send something. Also, Matrix has coutless clients with different feature sets and I heard calls are a pain to ßet up.
Signal, on the other hand, just works. Federation and decentralization is obviously nice but a functional product is more importmant. I haven't had a chance to try XMPP unfortunately.
DuckDuckGo slightly alters your search results based on your reginon and so I couldn't reproduce this. Try advanced syntax with queries like
+kate spellcheckeror even"kate" spellchecker. Failing that, add terms you don't want to see (-ai,-"quillbot").But is there any way I can get the dataset? If not, none of this is completely open source per OSI. The model itself is even advertised as “open-weight”, not open source.
Did he just manage to put quotes around the wrong thing? Also, side note: you don't capitalize “Allies”.
Casually comparing a game company founder to a brutal dictator who started a devestating war and an industrialized genocide is as strech to say the least.
Quote from the article:
This sounds AI generated. I suspect the entire article is. Some cases it explores I have heard of but I wouldn't trust AI to not make stuff up.
Ah, OK. I was hoping it would maybe do something clever like hash it and send a byte so the server can give it a small list of passwords to check locally but I guess they didn't bother…
President Trumap isn't your average person, he's leader of a superpower. That requires a certain level of security.
I mean, it does seem to do something. I generated a random one and it told me it was safe. For now! The box then told me to get a password manager with a link to its own password managers article and set up 2FA. The password manager list is just a collection of affiliate links with filler text btw.
If someone wants to figure out what the site sends to figure this stuff out and if it's more than just rockyou.txt, go ahead.
LeechBlock NG isn't exactly what your'e looking for but it still may help. Of course, it'll have no effect if UBO and the DNS already shut everything off.
Good thing the details aren't actually details. It's a super short Tweet by ReactOS with celebratory screenshot and the acknowledgement that it still has bugs and crashes you wouldn't get on actual Windows. That's genuinely it.
“Don't be evil”
DuckDuckGo actually tries to downrank them. It's just that there's no way ts tell for sure, especially for computers.
https://duckduckgo.com/settings#aifeatures
Have fun!
Note: These settings are stored in your cookies and if you clear those, the settings will reset. That's why we have https://noai.duckduckgo.com/.
That's actually a good idea if they're dealing with such campaigns. See it as the moderators (wo exist either way) directing their attention to places where violations are more likely to happen. Sure, DM monitoring sounds a bit intrusive, but admins reading your DMs was always a possibility and with the right user education, it shouldn't be an issue.