"The study, authored by Capraro with Chiara Marcoccia of École Normale Supérieure and Walter Quattrociocchi of Sapienza University of Rome, deliberately used questions where AI models typically fail: visual details from films, such as the colour of a team’s uniform in Bend It Like Beckham. The researchers used Step 3.5 Flash, a model that was usually wrong on these questions, precisely so any reduction in judgment could not be explained as sensible delegation to a reliable tool. Some participants who would have answered correctly on their own asked the AI and became wrong"
It's a Texas company named "Greenland Energy".
The Guardian article that was the source had better coverage of what's happening
Yeah, I'm ashamed of the democratic will of my country
As a Swede in ashamed of our right-wing government and the growing anti immigration policies as of late
I can like your post, power to the people!
No, just needs a lot of people with signs. That'll fix it
In Sweden we got 2 weeks in 1938...
Yeah, I remember.
Remember when LLMs could never be expected to do mathematics or when context limit could never exceed a few thousand tokens because of the kv-cache?
What's this, a reasonable take on AI!?
So, are you saying that the Internet actually became more useful and prevalent after the dot-com bubble?
What about "stochastic probabilistic", "no more training data" and "AI has hit a wall"?
You could just look at the data for each year instead of cherry-picking one example and calling it a washup...
His net worth is still half a trillion more than it was a year ago.
He didn't buy shares in SpaceX, he already had them before the IPO
"The study, authored by Capraro with Chiara Marcoccia of École Normale Supérieure and Walter Quattrociocchi of Sapienza University of Rome, deliberately used questions where AI models typically fail: visual details from films, such as the colour of a team’s uniform in Bend It Like Beckham. The researchers used Step 3.5 Flash, a model that was usually wrong on these questions, precisely so any reduction in judgment could not be explained as sensible delegation to a reliable tool. Some participants who would have answered correctly on their own asked the AI and became wrong"
"On X, one person wrote"
Come on guys...
Nah, they already have that
Seems like an effective way to deter corruption.
The US basically already had unrestricted access to put up military installations on Greenland.
As a Swede, I'd rather not have a war with the US. But if it comes down to it, I'm in full support of Denmark and Greenland.
Our submarines would sink any US fleet: https://www.19fortyfive.com/2026/02/sweden-sank-a-u-s-navy-aircraft-carrier-how-one-wargame-showed-how-americas-supercarriers-can-be-beaten/
No you haven't
To any American who knows a little history, this is your "then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out..."-moment
"Which they did"
Did you forget to switch account?
You wouldn't look at the proof and just ask another loaded question and move the goalposts anyway
The article has several em-dashes. AI uses them all the time and people never do