Tree trunks are round. At least wooden tables are more likely to desire a circular shape. So corners are likely to be parasitic on wooden tables at least.
They didn't do half of that what I saw. They themselves posted the "proof" about it being fake. You can see it on their profile.
And I see unruffled is now claiming that @Emopunker@feddit.org was friends with the op. Never saw emopunker say that in the thread either and there's no post like that in their post history (they mention monitoring kiwi farms because they harass their ND friend). A bizarre lie to tell.
Again, considering that db0 is demonstrably cool with death wishes and harassment, I'm finding it hard to believe they are innocent in this.
Yeah, because their behavior tracks with this conclusion. Db0 users are frequently extremely hostile to anyone who expresses even slightest empathy towards jews, under the pretense of anti-zionism, and their admins do nothing about it.
I don't buy it. The screenshot thread is set to private. The archive thread is open. How convenient that there was a public thread available for archiving.
it makes sense to support whatever system would create the best life for everyone,
That's your value and you can use OP's formula to act accordingly. But you can't force other people to adopt your values, that would be tyranny (and also kinda impossible). Not that I disagree with you but that's not a counterargument, you're just expressing how YOU would apply the formula OP presented.
That's not the question. The question is just if you find it to enable the kind of life you value. If your experience is that a system doesn't do this, don't support it. This isn't that complicated lol
The "makes sense" in the op means that from the perspective of the doer, it makes sense. OP is not saying that it's "objectively beneficial to all humans".
That's a lot of logical fallacy from someone who claims to have been teaching philosophy.
Moderating blatant misinformation or bomb-making instructions does not inevitably lead to censoring valid political dissent. There is also a significant functional difference between Abstract Ideas (Socrates’ questioning of virtue) and Instructional Violations (blueprints for violence).
Equating moderating a privately run online space to making someone drink hemlock by the way of a state execution is a hell of a reach.
You are basically claiming some forms of knowledge are too dangerous for people to know.
Nope. Never said that. I said "You might not be persecuted for having these “theoretical” discussions, which is fine...".
I'm fine with civil discourse, even with some unsavory opinions. Not so fine with people spreading blatant misinformation and propaganda. There needs to be decent moderation for this, which as I understand, Odysee seems to fail at.
As @dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone is pointing out, commitment to (absolute) free speech tends to attract Nazis. And by Nazis I mean, actual, literal Nazis, not just people who don't agree with me on soylent being a decent meal replacement.
Also, lets never forget that (absolute) free speech would also cover allowing "theoretical" discussion on how to manipulate, groom and kidnap children for certain purposes etc. How to "theoretically" build bombs. How to "theoretically" drug and kill people etc. You might not be persecuted for having these "theoretical" discussions, which is fine but I think it's healthy for any online space to remove such topics.
Cozy Pixel Dating Exposition Building Pastel Farming Dog Quirky Fishing Rogue-lite Crafter
Tree trunks are round. At least wooden tables are more likely to desire a circular shape. So corners are likely to be parasitic on wooden tables at least.
You don't need corners to have a table (it can be round)
But a corner cannot exist without features that form it.
They didn't do half of that what I saw. They themselves posted the "proof" about it being fake. You can see it on their profile.
And I see unruffled is now claiming that @Emopunker@feddit.org was friends with the op. Never saw emopunker say that in the thread either and there's no post like that in their post history (they mention monitoring kiwi farms because they harass their ND friend). A bizarre lie to tell.
Again, considering that db0 is demonstrably cool with death wishes and harassment, I'm finding it hard to believe they are innocent in this.
Also suspicious is that they are now piling on the feddit.org mod in multiple threads.
It's consistently db0 users and their ilk that spew hate on others. That's the bigger telltale sign for me.
Yeah, because their behavior tracks with this conclusion. Db0 users are frequently extremely hostile to anyone who expresses even slightest empathy towards jews, under the pretense of anti-zionism, and their admins do nothing about it.
Walks like a duck.
Quacks like a duck.
Damn if it ain't a duck.
I don't buy it. The screenshot thread is set to private. The archive thread is open. How convenient that there was a public thread available for archiving.
Turns out people who advocate for Jew-hate are Neo-nazis. Who woulda thunk.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Otto_Warmbier
He's dead.
That's your value and you can use OP's formula to act accordingly. But you can't force other people to adopt your values, that would be tyranny (and also kinda impossible). Not that I disagree with you but that's not a counterargument, you're just expressing how YOU would apply the formula OP presented.
Then you're finding it worthwhile to support a system that allows for you to merely tolerate it
We had something like this in our philosophy class.
That's not the question. The question is just if you find it to enable the kind of life you value. If your experience is that a system doesn't do this, don't support it. This isn't that complicated lol
Makes sense for me to interpret what OP said in that way because I find logic and reading comprehension worthwhile for life.
The "makes sense" in the op means that from the perspective of the doer, it makes sense. OP is not saying that it's "objectively beneficial to all humans".
It's a description of how people make choices.
OP didn't say it was good or bad. Just that it makes sense for them because they thought it was what they like.
There's a difference between saying "I think X, and Here's Why: Proof" and "YOU SHOULD NEVER CONSUME X IT WILL KILL YOU"
Oh I do love a weird internet feel
That's a lot of logical fallacy from someone who claims to have been teaching philosophy.
Moderating blatant misinformation or bomb-making instructions does not inevitably lead to censoring valid political dissent. There is also a significant functional difference between Abstract Ideas (Socrates’ questioning of virtue) and Instructional Violations (blueprints for violence).
Equating moderating a privately run online space to making someone drink hemlock by the way of a state execution is a hell of a reach.
Nope. Never said that. I said "You might not be persecuted for having these “theoretical” discussions, which is fine...".
I'm fine with civil discourse, even with some unsavory opinions. Not so fine with people spreading blatant misinformation and propaganda. There needs to be decent moderation for this, which as I understand, Odysee seems to fail at.
As @dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone is pointing out, commitment to (absolute) free speech tends to attract Nazis. And by Nazis I mean, actual, literal Nazis, not just people who don't agree with me on soylent being a decent meal replacement.
Also, lets never forget that (absolute) free speech would also cover allowing "theoretical" discussion on how to manipulate, groom and kidnap children for certain purposes etc. How to "theoretically" build bombs. How to "theoretically" drug and kill people etc. You might not be persecuted for having these "theoretical" discussions, which is fine but I think it's healthy for any online space to remove such topics.