Modern Gaming - Deathbulge

Comic: https://www.deathbulge.com/comics/441

Alt text: Yeah yeah, there's always exceptions, I mean look no further than the game in the 2nd panel, not the most thrilling gameplay, is it?

1.4k points · 211 comments · view on lemmy.world

211 Comments

ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 165 pts · 32d (25 replies)

There's definitely amazing indie games, but there's also hundreds of shitty and terrible indie games for every decent one.

unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de · 230 pts · 32d (7 replies)

And thats the natural way of the world. Without shitty artists there would be no good artists, because every good artist was once a shitty artist.

ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -33 pts · 32d (6 replies)

Sure everyone needs to start somewhere. I'm just saying it's also very far from all sunshine and rainbows in indie-game land.

Yoddel_Hickory@piefed.ca · 83 pts · 32d (3 replies)

I mean don't play the ones you don't want to...?

fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com · 29 pts · 32d (2 replies)

Also, I'm a lot more willing to gamble on a $20 game than an $80 one.

almost_genocide@lemmy.world · 19 pts · 32d (1 reply)

My experience has been indie games are pretty well vetted if they are able to sell for $20.

Plenty of $3-5 games that are a bit of a gamble though. Even if it ends up being kind of lame I figure it's funding for the developer to make another attempt.

korazail@lemmy.myserv.one · 4 pts · 31d

Adding on to that: Sometimes these indie devs, who made a cool thing as a passion project and get rewarded with life-changing money via sales, then go on to continually update the thing since they can now devote time to passion. Thinking Minecraft, Terraria, Vampire Survivors, Stardew Valley as my personal "I have sunk hundreds of hours into this title" games. That $3 game might have good bones and just need time to flesh it out.

Also the communities will rally around devs that don't use predatory pricing and cash-grabs. I know I'm not the only one who bought more copies of some of these games (or their OSTs, donation DLCs, Patreon, etc) to gift or even just as a thank-you when something updated and gave me more content or more polished experience.

My game list were so popular it was almost cliche, but we can't really predict what the next great thing will be until it's there and pricing your new best-seller at $3 means you get exposure and good will.

unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de · 5 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Yeah you are right there is plenty of small slop games that were clearly made as a cashgrab full of microstransactions and bugs. But i jist wanted to point out that its not so black and white.

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 32d

If you read the negative reviews on steam, you can often filter these shitty ones out. Also, be suspicious by default of free games. There are some that were made by some game dev just having fun but most want to make money some way or another and f2p monetization is often pretty toxic, like adding a long grind just to sell ways to avoid it or p2w mechanics.

I haven't felt like I've gone wrong by generally just buying the cheapest well-reviewed games on my wishlist, occasionally stretching the budget to grab a mid-priced game I'm interested in and rarely going for a AAA priced game. Means that I get to some great games later (eg, Hollow Knight is one of the more recent ones, highly recommended btw) but it's been a great way to experience a wide variety of games from today and the last 15 years for not that much money.

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 72 pts · 32d (4 replies)

I can respect a shitty indie game that has passion. You can tell a lot of people are ALMOST there on itch.io sometimes. And its just so close. Or just something that doesnt click with you. But thats ok.

cabbagepatchcrabs@retrolemmy.com · 28 pts · 32d (2 replies)

"Or just something that doesn't click with you. But that's ok." You're going to rile up the rage addicts with this calm logic.

Gamechanger@slrpnk.net · 7 pts · 32d

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d

It's funniest when they act like their rage is justified. Or destroy their own things.

sol6_vi@lemmy.makearmy.io · 4 pts · 32d

This wisdom is strong. I respect the fuck out of shitty games that have crazy passion. I often enjoy them far more than soulless titles that are perfectly polished. A lot of my favorite games gain their character from their rough edges. Peripetia, Alisa, Webfishing come to mind.

cholesterol@lemmy.world · 60 pts · 32d

I don't think the intended message is that all indie games are great. The message is that if you're frustrated with AAA-games and haven't considered indie games, you should.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 27 pts · 32d (2 replies)

there’s also hundreds of shitty and terrible indie games for every decent one.

I would skip those and play the good ones

ripcord@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 32d

Yes.

Ratings systems and reviews aren't perfect, but they are a good starting point.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 32d

I would play them both. Because fuck me I guess

atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 6 pts · 32d

If you dont play a game for 2 hours and didnt buy it more than 2 weeks ago, you can refund it if you bought it on steam

IvyisAngy@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 31d

That's why the Indie side is a full ecosystem.

Shitty games die and fertilize the ground so that all the good ones can grow.

If a AAA game dies, it takes another 6 years for investors and executives to gain the balls to maybe risk spending the money to make another game, so it fertilizes nothing, just sits and rots on sand.

almost_genocide@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Oh no I spent $3 on a game that could use some more polish.

Honestly even if the game ends up being kinda lame I won't ask for a refund.

ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com · -1 pts · 32d

There's a lot of indie games costing $30+ these days

belit_deg@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 32d
stickyprimer@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d

There are more good indie games than ever. It doesn’t bother me that there are also more bad indie games than ever. We have a variety of ways to separate the wheat from the chaff. And I don’t think the ratio has ever been better than 1:100 in any genre in any time period. 🤷‍♂️

Smoogs@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d

yes but more chances to be good. variance is expected ln chances. the choice is your's to pick which ones to play. no one said you absolutely had to play the shit ones. use your free will.

AmyAye@nord.pub · 1 pts · 32d

That is why indie gamer bloggers still exist, to write about which ones are bad and which are good.

All the old cool shit still exists even if its not "mainstream".

Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 72 pts · 32d (33 replies)

I mean… if you only have a console (or even worse: only a Smartphone) I get why it looks like that to people. Some people apparently don't even have a PC or laptop anymore.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 52 pts · 32d (15 replies)

I'm genuinely upset at how miserable the mobile scene is compared to the rest.

I've got a phone that's orders of magnitude above a TurboGrafx or a Game Gear, but 95% of the games are GACHA crap or so ad bloated as to be unplayable.

Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 23 pts · 32d (8 replies)

Yeah, it's abysmal. I still rock a OnePlus 7 Pro from 2019 with /e/OS, that damn thing can run Crysis (I tried, works with Winlator - lots of compatibility bugs though). The SoCs are so powerful Valve designs a whole stand-alone VR system around it able to play full-blown PC titles. Modern phones got crazy performance.

Good games without all the extorsion money simply can't compete in the attention game though and people won't pay money for something worthwhile if there's a storm of crap "for free". The internet and digital spaces in general got utterly broken by surveillanve capitalism. But, you see… it's for ✨the economy✨.

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 32d

people won’t pay money for something worthwhile if there’s a storm of crap “for free”.

I've got the first six FFs, which were remastered and released on Mobile. Got me through lockdown, when I was just trapped in a socially distanced office with nothing to do.

Like, it's definitely possible to make - and sell - a good game that works well on a phone.

The internet and digital spaces in general got utterly broken by surveillanve capitalism.

Ain't that the fucking truth.

Buddahriffic@lemmy.world · 8 pts · 32d (5 replies)

Personally a big thing that holds me back from even seriously considering mobile gaming as an extension to normal gaming instead of "the best you can do when you don't have access to better devices" is the input side. I hate touchscreen controls for anything with real time action because touching the screen obscures it from view, plus you don't get the tactile feedback of buttons that makes it trivial to play without needing to readjust your finger positions constantly.

And I know there are external controllers you can use with phones, but if I'm making space (and remembering to bring) one of those, I might as well just bring my steam deck or even the switch instead.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d (4 replies)

I mean, yeah, why not bring a dedicated device, but the shit you can do with a phone and a controller is not unimpressive. I've got anything and everything psx and before emulated (including SCUMM and DOS, so I could play old lucasarts or sierra games. Fuck if I remember how to do that. Something on fdroid) on a oneplus 7 pro and galaxy s3.

Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 31d (3 replies)

I think the money aspect is a big one with this. Someone with a Steam Deck and/or Switch doesn't see the need (well, Switch maybe unless it's jailbroken), but if you just want something and money is tight then a new 50€ controller and your existing phone gets you way further.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 31d (2 replies)

50€? What has happened to the controller market in Europe while I was in the toilet?

EDIT Cheap gamesir for $35 USD. I've got an old gamesir g3s. Something like 10 years old. Still works great, i might have to reset it with the pin if I've been using it 8 hours straight.

Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 31d

I have a GameSir G4 and it's trash, utterly awful input lag and the connection never worked correctly with any device other than Android either. Basically unusable without a cable, I'd never recommend their stuff.

lemmyng@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 32d

It's unfortunate that the attention economy is what sells the existence of these indies in the first place.

WillFord27@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Slay the Spire!

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 32d

They need to release the sequel on mobile already. I'm dying here

FiniteBanjo@feddit.online · 7 pts · 32d

Well, as a consolation prize, you can run PPSSPP on Android, Linux, and possibly iPhone. You can also find archived ISOs for pretty much every PSP game ever made such as Monster Hunter Freedom Unite, Monster Hunter Portable 3rd, Crash Twin Racing, Phantasy Star 2, etc.

Link to ISOs

atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 32d (2 replies)

There is nubbys number factory

And thats it, there are no other good mobile games

diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 31d

Only counting (intended) exclusives, uhh...

osu!stream...

Uhhhhhhhhhhhh...

Mekorama.

Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...

Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 31d

The only mobile game Ive purchased is Monument Valley, I really liked that one.

Hond@piefed.social · 4 pts · 32d (4 replies)

You can emulate tons of consoles and games on your phone though

ramble81@lemmy.zip · 11 pts · 32d (3 replies)

Just sucks without physical buttons. Using button on the screen covers things up and is much harder to use.

Hond@piefed.social · 3 pts · 32d

Agreed. Some emulators do have the option for haptic feedback via the vibrations. Which still isnt ideal but i found it quite useable for certain types of games.

Or you just buy a bt/usb controller for 20-50 bucks. A few phones even have usb-c dp alt mode and you can enjoy the games on the big screen.

mineralfellow@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d

Got a Bluetooth controller. Changed everything.

Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 31d

There are a few really good gamepads (or smartphone holders for e.g. Dualshock).

Taking a premium phone from a few years ago and slapping a controller on it genuinely makes an awesome mobile console. And inbetween all the garbage there even are a few really good native games, such as the remastered GTA Trilogy.

k0e3@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 32d (3 replies)

Even if you only have a console, it's really not THAT bad especially if you're not a conscious consumer. Like my kids love their Switch 2 games because they don't really know any better yet. They see me playing different games on my PC or even indies on the Switch and look genuinely interested so I'll get them to play those soon enough to expand their horizons (and eventually let them know how shitty a company Nintendo truly is lol).

abfarid@startrek.website · 4 pts · 32d (2 replies)

But Switch exclusives are amazing anyway. 1st party Nintendo games are almost always good. And ever since Switch 1, pretty much all of the indie games are available on the platform. And since indie games don't really need powerful hardware, it's a great experience.

Natanox@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 31d

The quality is good, I give that to them. But their pricing, ownership model and especially opinion about copyright is abysmal (weren't they the ones trying to patent relative motion?). Nintendo has some genuinely good artists and engineers who clearly love their job but they take the carrot-and-stick approach to the extreme and it's disgusting.

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 1 pts · 32d
[ removed ]
ApollosArrow@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d (2 replies)

A lot of great games have been ported to phones. Then you have emulation. I am playing games up until 3DS on a 6yr old phone with a blue tooth remote that sticks to the back of my phone.

HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Do you have the screen vertical or two screens horizontal? I've been trying to get through a run of radiant historia and I keep falling apart because I can't get the screens lined up right

ApollosArrow@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 31d

I’ve been doing the screen vertical. I have an McCon that can change the direction you place the phone on the remote.

carrylex@lemmy.world · -3 pts · 32d (4 replies)

if you only have a console

... then your an idiot in the first place.

If you spent $700+ on a gaming only device that you can't use for most "PC activities" (office, banking, browsing the web, etc), than you obviously set your priorities wrong.

Most indie games run on 10 year old budget laptops/PCs and you can get them definetly cheaper than a console.

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 3 pts · 31d (3 replies)

Do you know how goddamn cheap an old console can be? It's insane value for money for entertainment. You do not have to buy the latest console. I played Star Wars Racer for hours the other day with my nephew, on the old Nintendo 64 in my games cupboard, gathering dust but still working perfectly.

carrylex@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 31d (2 replies)

Yeah cool, but the meme is about modern gaming...

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 31d (1 reply)

The meme is, but you were saying that consoles are hella expensive. I was just saying they do not have to be.

carrylex@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 31d

Of course you can buy a 15 year old console for $50 or something like this. But will it run any modern games? Obviously no.

I can also probably buy a 15 year old PC for the same price, install Linux and use it as a daily driver and maybe even run some modern Indie games.

So really not sure what's your point in this discussion when you change the starting point...

HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world · 51 pts · 32d (8 replies)

Unfortunately a large percentage of the population (subconsciously) believe that if a product isn't marketed to them, they shouldn't touch it.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 72 pts · 32d (4 replies)

To put it more accurately, they don't look. They don't seek. They wait for it to get served to them via an algorithmic feed.

I think this is a core issue with all of civilization, right now.

Katana314@lemmy.world · 17 pts · 32d (3 replies)

We will mock this, but we all use Product X in industry Y, which is the more well-known brand of that industry. We don’t know that if we explore Z Niche Store, we can find excellent replacements for Product X that can take a little more effort to use and appreciate but are valued more for it.

You can fill in that mad lib in several ways; it’s very much down to which industries you pay close attention to.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 7 pts · 31d (1 reply)

How much difference does it make for your life?

What's the fraction of your time you spend in it?

How long do you have to work to earn the money to pay for it?

As I see it, those are the kind of question which dictate how much time one should spend in trying to figure out the best option for something.

Trying to figure out the best cost/quality option in, say, soap or discardable plates for a party, is seldom worth it versus spending time figuring out, say, what's the best house or car to buy or even just a good sofa for you living room or mattress for your bed.

And yeah, plenty of people won't spend anywhere as much time researching even a purchase they're going to spend the next 30 years paying for (the house), which IMHO is pretty sad - if something will cost you tens of thousands of hours of your life to pay for (by working to earn the money to pay for it), spending many hours of your time in making totally sure you're getting the right one is the wisest way of going about it.

So, it's totally logical for casual gamers to invest in their game purchasing decisions the same time and care as they do for, say, their soap purchases, and it's logical for people who spend many hours a week playing games to care a lot more about finding the best games for what's probably their main form of entertainment.

HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 31d

HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 31d

HerbGrower@slrpnk.net · 23 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Sounds like a them problem

HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 31d

Technically it's more of a Deez Paradox.

ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 31d

And there's also those, who will throw a hissyfit if they're forced to play something without modern AAA graphics, don't want to play "woke" games, etc.

ech@lemmy.ca · 36 pts · 32d (9 replies)

Same thing for movies, music, etc. The people that piss and moan about their media being terrible are the ones that can't be bothered to lift a finger to seek out something better. They only bother with media that falls into their lap, and that's petty much all determined by studios that care more about profits than quality.

tempest@lemmy.ca · 13 pts · 32d (2 replies)

I think it's still a bit of a fair critique.

There were always sequels and garbage 30 years ago but someone who maybe only saw a movie a year the chance that it would be a new IP were higher. Studios are allergic to risk so they would prefer a mediocre known quality.

That said you're right there's more media than ever and tones of interesting options in niche areas. That said discoverability is not free. You have to put in a decent amount of effort and even still you might end up watching a niche indie darling that was never for you and come out disappointed.

For someone who only periodically dips into a form of media I think the current landscape is undeniably worse than it was and I understand when they complain about it.

chiliedogg@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Streaming has changed films. With on-demand TV, and more affordable, higher-qualitt home theatres, the only films worh spending money on seeing in a cinema are the big eye-candy films.

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 31d

However, those streaming films are often lower quality if they weren't also released in cinemas.

festus@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 32d (3 replies)

On the topic of indie films, can people in-the-known share some suggestions for what's worth watching?

almost_genocide@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d

Brick, Moon, Sunshine, Seven psychopaths

I don't know how many of those are actually indie but I feel like they all flew in under the radar.

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 31d

Grey Man, purely for Captain America in a pedostache hamming it up as a villain.

Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 31d

Back in the day, I used to just look up the different indie film festivals, see what was nominated/won, go watch the trailer, and pirate the ones I was interested in.

Found a lot of films this way.

guitarfosec@infosec.pub · 2 pts · 31d

Exactly. It's like when people complained that rock and roll died again at the end of the 90's. Sure, if you don't seek out better music and just take what's handed to you by MTV and the radio (or what Spotify shows on its Home screen these days), then music is terrible now. If you go digging, you can find all kinds of amazing stuff. Same goes for gaming. Good studios get too big or bought out and ruined by people who only care about money, but if you dig around you can find all kinds of good stuff.

The stuff that "lands in your lap" was actually shoved there by a multi-million dollar marketing budget. That almost certainly means the product itself is meant for mass consumption and may not be that compelling or interesting. If you're willing to spend the time and effort to look around and play some bad games along the way, you'll find the good ones.

HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 32d

That's what folks don't seem to realize, it's always been about money and the entire industry has always been toxic and what we have now is it's natural outcome. There's always been non mainstream content and more recently it's become more accessable which hurts the profits of the industry meaning they do less innovating because they worry about the ROI beyond anything. This drives more people to non mainstream which increases its quality. It just requires effort to find.

cally@piefed.blahaj.zone · 31 pts · 32d (23 replies)

Ultrakill, Deltarune and Celeste are my favorite video games, all indie I think.

KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz · 7 pts · 32d (5 replies)

I love deltarune and I enjoyed the ultrakill demo, never tried Celeste though

Most games I play are indie ones cause those are the best imo

Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org · 6 pts · 32d (4 replies)

never tried Celeste though

How solid is your relationship to your gender?

benjirenji@slrpnk.net · 3 pts · 31d (1 reply)

Is this really the best takeaway from the game? I love Celeste and I'm pretty solid with my gender identity. The music and game mechanics are the best parts. You reference the story, which ain't bad, but definitely not where the game shines.

Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org · 1 pts · 31d

Ehh different people take away different things from the game. One of the pivotal experiences that lead to me finding out I'm trans was beating Celeste.

KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 32d (1 reply)

honestly unsure

Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.org · 5 pts · 32d

Well, then Celeste sounds like the perfect game for you!

diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de · 3 pts · 32d (12 replies)

Depends on how you define indie. By my definition, Deltarune is still indie but made by a quintillionaire so like, meh. Celeste was indie when it was just a fantasy console bs thing.

llmbot@sh.itjust.works · 6 pts · 32d (2 replies)

I mean Deltarune was made by toby fox who became a millionaire from his other indie game Undertale. I think it definitely counts.

diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de · 4 pts · 32d (1 reply)

I did say "is still indie".

Flagstaff@programming.dev · 5 pts · 32d

You also said, "but made by a quintillionaire," as if that is a point lowering its indie status, and as if money is the defining aspect of indie vs. AAA.

TheSambassador@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 32d (3 replies)

So if an indie game blows up because it's great then it's not indie? That's a silly way to define it.

Have some mid-sized studios co-opted the term? Sure. Expedition 33 is on that AA spectrum, but a game by a very small team? In what definition is Celeste not an indie game?

diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 32d (2 replies)

Here's one definition. If you go to the Steam page for Deltarune, it says "tobyfox" as developer, that's a (nick)name. OneShot (2016) says "Future Cat LLC" but that seems to be made up since Steam asks for "company name". Celeste's "Maddy Makes Games Inc." seems real, however. Therefore, Celeste isn't indie.

TheSambassador@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 31d (1 reply)

You still haven't defined anything. So if a game is only made by one person, it's indie? Games made by very small teams aren't indie?

Look, I get it, "indie" is actually a bit of a nebulous term, and is often co-opted by medium/large size studios who want to pretend to be "better" than the AAA games, but no reasonable person would call Celeste "not indie."

diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de · 1 pts · 31d

So if a game is only made by one person, it's indie?

The first two examples are clearly made by multiple people. They just haven't registered a company. I good rule I found, not for games but just in general, is that if it's a registered organization it's probably not as good as you think it is otherwise.

psycotica0@lemmy.ca · 4 pts · 32d (3 replies)

I think the most accurate definition is "produced without a publisher". That's the thing they're independent of.

Where it gets grey is things like "okay it has a publisher, but they're tiny and cute and only publish indie-feeling game"

So the "feeling" of indie is "made by a small group of people with a shared cohesive vision and minimal outside influence", where publishers tend to be large sources of outside influence, and teams larger than, like, 50 people tend to be unable to all have a truly shared cohesive vision. And a single person, by definition, always has a shared vision no matter what they make. But if a publisher is low-touch, or brings a game that's basically done to market without asking for changes, and the game feels cohesive and personal, then that's good enough.

diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de · 2 pts · 31d (1 reply)

That's also a really shitty definition since Valve and Nintendo are publishing themselves too. If you argue "well they are their own publisher" then I counter with "well anyone uploading to itch.io will have itch.io as their publisher".

psycotica0@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 31d

Right, that's where the other definitions come in. I'd say itch is a distributor rather than a publisher, but even if you don't care about that distinction, it is definitely the case that itch doesn't tell the developer to do anything. So publishing on itch doesn't affect the vision for the game.

Nintendo... I mean kinda yeah. They're a weird one. Some of their games they're just the publisher, and there is another developer with a different name. But some things they do actually develop and self-publish. And some of the games have surprisingly few people working on them...

There may actually be a few Nintendo games that are kinda indie, oddly enough.

Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 31d

I think the most accurate definition is "produced without a publisher". That's the thing they're independent of.

Yeah I think it was the original meaning. And New Blood, ultrakill's publisher, is only doing small games so far IIRC (also they have some ridiculous merch for their games alongside some pretty cool one) so they fit the "indie-ish" publishers category I have

Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 31d

And ultrakill probably sold the least out of these 3 but actually has a publisher (it's also my favorite of the 3)

thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 32d (2 replies)

not played those but deltarune, undertale, and celeste are on my planned list, and might check ultrakill out

i rlly like hollow knight and hollow knight silksong, which are 2 very good indie games

the main non indie ones i play are minecraft and the legend of zelda series

Simulation6@sopuli.xyz · 4 pts · 31d (1 reply)

Minecraft is an indie game that became super popular.

thethunderwolf@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 27d

its not indie now

was originally

kepix@lemmy.world · 0 pts · 31d

both ultrakill and dusk look like arse, and that might turn people away

mrfriki@lemmy.world · 30 pts · 32d (1 reply)

So true! If you ignore big corpo and their slop, we actually live in a golden age of gaming.

Flagstaff@programming.dev · 8 pts · 32d

We always have and I've often ignored big corp.

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 29 pts · 32d (35 replies)

Games that I have enjoyed that are indie:

Its a wild ride I recommend!

What are your picks?

davad@lemmy.world · 23 pts · 32d (4 replies)

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1569580/Blue_Prince/

A fun puzzle game with lots of layers to it. There's the original, stated goal. But as you work towards it, you discover lore that points you towards other puzzles.

AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world · 12 pts · 32d (1 reply)

This game is genius until you're determined to truly finish it... Then the next level of the puzzles border on insanity.

davad@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 32d

Yup. I'm working on the final puzzles right now. Just finished one of the final two doors. I wouldn't even be sure there was a second puzzle if it weren't for hints on the wiki 😳.

StumblingWasabi@lemmy.today · 4 pts · 32d

For puzzle games, my goto is baba is you

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 2 pts · 32d

Interesting! ill take a look.

NorthWestWind@lemmy.world · 15 pts · 32d (2 replies)

No way Undertale/Deltarune fans haven't shown up yet

UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 32d (1 reply)

This one has arrived

Genuinely crazy that it so rarely gets mentioned in the "we'll never see another original game again!!!" hysteria.

Larian Studios also has a string of bangers that should mark it out as the next Bethesda or BioWare, but it also routinely gets ignored.

Zarobi@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 32d

CRPGs aren't as popular as a genre is the main reason

NaibofTabr@infosec.pub · 12 pts · 32d (1 reply)
  1. Jazzpunk https://store.steampowered.com/app/250260/Jazzpunk_Directors_Cut/ - Everyone should play Jazzpunk. Watch the trailer, and read no other reviews, just play it.

  2. Far: Lone Sails https://store.steampowered.com/app/609320/FAR_Lone_Sails/ - a gorgeous art piece, a good story that develops through the gameplay, worth your time.

  3. Void War https://store.steampowered.com/app/2853590/Void_War/ - Void War is FTL crossed with Warhammer 40k, but it's not just a reskin. If you ever wanted more FTL gameplay, Void War is it.

  4. The Red Strings Club https://store.steampowered.com/app/589780/The_Red_Strings_Club/ - a great story with beautifully written characters, everything that digital storytelling should be.

  5. Songs of Syx https://store.steampowered.com/app/1162750/Songs_of_Syx/ - this has been eating my brain recently. If you enjoy colony builders like Rimworld or Dwarf Fortress, Songs of Syx is potentially dangerous in that where did the last eight hours go kind of way. It's still got some rough spots, but the developer is actively working on it.

*Bonus - Fatum Betula https://store.steampowered.com/app/1281270/Fatum_Betula/ - a strange experience, like nothing else that I know of. I also recommend going into this one blind, just watch the developer's trailer.

davad@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 32d

+1 for Far. I've only played a little, but the art and music are fantastic.

I'll have to check out the rest.

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus · 11 pts · 32d (3 replies)
  • Star Valor is one of my all time favourites - i always come back to this one, it never gets boring.
  • Dead Cells doesn't need much introduction i think.
  • Pathogenic is the newest addition to my library, and it's a really fun and innovative twin stick shooter with a great soundtrack and a very polished design.
  • Look Outside Is a horror survival game. Lots of body horror, for those who like that. Great atmosphere, i love playing it at night on my steam deck.
AmyAye@nord.pub · 3 pts · 32d

Dead Cells has difficukty adjustments in the menus too, for anyone who tried it and hated it like I did. They added it later. Its a lot of fun even on easy mode. I played it enough that I had the difficulty back to "normal" and even higher at one point too.

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 3 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Star valor kinda reminds me of the old Inner space game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCcpqUL90rY

Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus · 2 pts · 32d

Yes, i loved that back in the days too, fighting through my Mp3 collection lol

lemmyng@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 32d (1 reply)

There are some NSFW games I've had a lot of fun with that are contenders for a space in your library:

The Flipwitch series is a fun Metroidvania that asks "what if changing gender at will was a gameplay mechanic?"

Scarlet Maiden was my first 2d platformer roguelike I've ever sunk hours into and really turned me on to the genre, pun intended.

Spirit Valley is "what if Pokemon but with sexy monster girls?" There are even shinies to hunt!

Elf Girl Pinball is a lot of fun!

Tower/Sword of Succubus are two entirely different genres. Tower is more puzzle based, Sword is essentially sexy Zelda. Even comes with the free Castlevania throwback: Succubus Hunter. The series even expands further into search-action with Midnight Castle Succubus DX and Castle in the Clouds DX. Seriously, check these out while you wait for Belmont's Curse.

Smash Girls looks fun if you can get it to run without crashing and rebooting your PC. Basically Smash Bros with Hentai.

Trainguyrom@reddthat.com · 3 pts · 32d

I've sunk way more hours than I'd ever have thought into My Dystopian Robot Girlfriend. Still haven't finished it at all but really good storyline and honestly the porn aspects can be completely ignored

TheWinged7@lemmy.zip · 9 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Outer wilds a fun little mystery game about exploring a small alient solar system

Don't look up anything about it and go in as blind as you can for the best experience

Goodeye8@piefed.social · 6 pts · 32d

My only suggestion for outer wilds is that at the very start of the game if the village feels boring just go straight to the ship and once you've taken off give the game at least another half an hour to wow you. If by that time you're not hooked the game might not be for you.

Zarobi@aussie.zone · 5 pts · 32d (8 replies)

I've been enjoying My Little Puppy. It's a cute little game about finding your human. Not for kids though.

Edit: I've finished the game, here is my Steam review.

::: spoiler Tap for review Wow what a game… ok first and foremost, for any parents reading this, I would actually rate this game as PG not the current G age rating, due to certain themes.

+++ Animations and graphics for the dogs are perfect. Really makes you feel like a dog

+++ Environment design, sound design, pacing, themes, all of it is perfect

+++ Huge amount of detail and effort put in to the story, even side characters

+ Controls are mostly good. I had this bug where I would have to let go of the direction stick and press forwards again every 5 minutes or so, which was mildly annoying.

- Some of the puzzles, quick time events, and platforming jumps would be very difficult for a child. I can't see anyone under 10 maybe 13 finishing this game without adult assistance. Heck even as an adult some sections really annoyed me.

I can't really review anything else without giving it away. It's definitely worth playing. If you're on the fence, consider this review your signal to go for it. :::

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 3 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Is it like spiritfarer? That game fucked me up.

Zarobi@aussie.zone · 0 pts · 32d

Not so far, though I haven't finished the game yet

Entropy_Pyre@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 32d (2 replies)

I’ve been playing that and loving it! Is…is it not kid friendly? A lot of the gameplay… seems just cute and simple… Ohno. Anxious now that it might have a dark af ending o-o Guess I’ll see.

Zarobi@aussie.zone · 4 pts · 32d

Sorry by that I meant that the gameplay is actually quite difficult. The quick time events are strict and there's no accessibility option, the jumps are tight especially in some sections, etc. So far the themes are kid friendly, though I haven't beaten it yet*. But I can't see anyone under 10 maybe 13 beating this game without serious frustration. Heck as an adult I got annoyed at repeatedly failing a few seconds 😂

Zarobi@aussie.zone · 1 pts · 31d

I've finished the game now. No spoilers, but for any parents reading this:

::: spoiler Tap for not spoiler I would personally rate the game PG instead of the current G age rating due to certain themes :::

AmyAye@nord.pub · 2 pts · 32d (2 replies)

"This looks amazing!"

"Oh, its already on my wishlist, I thought itnwas amazing before too!"

Zarobi@aussie.zone · 3 pts · 32d (1 reply)

You have to buy it now, it's the double wishlist rule

AmyAye@nord.pub · 3 pts · 32d

You joke but I have used this before.

Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 4 pts · 32d

Voices of the Void is great and free! It’s a game set in a government facility in the woods where you monitor satellites to try to detect aliens.

!VoicesOfTheVoid@indie-ver.se

Zwiebel@feddit.org · 3 pts · 32d

I mean c'mon you gotta at least acknoledge that these are wildly different genres from the AAA games people complain about

hdnsmbt@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 32d (1 reply)

https://store.steampowered.com/developer/knucklecracker

I really enjoyed most games by Knuckle Cracker. They're very unique and different.

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 1 pts · 32d

I love creaper world but i feel like its one of those games you either love or hate pretty strongly. I have 100+ of hours into the series.

atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone · 2 pts · 32d

I have to use every opportunity to recommend vivid/stasis. Its amazing, my favorite game

catgirl is another cool game

Both games are free and have a cool story, the second took me 5 hours to finish, in the first one i have spent 117 hours

Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 pts · 31d

Right now I am hitting endgame in SolarPunk. I fucking love it.

Im the type, if a game hands you a gun, and says go kill the bad guys, Ill pass. It's very clear in this game, it will not be for everyone, I however, have sunk 60 hours into it in the last few weeks. It's for me, and I love it.

carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 1 pts · 32d (1 reply)

if you’re looking for a fun couch coop game, towerfall is really awesome! it’s a 2D vertical fighting game with bows, the controls are very easy to pick up and the rounds are fast, so anyone can join in and it’s really fun!

mesamunefire@piefed.social · 2 pts · 32d

Oh wow havent seen that game since the ouya. It was actually super fun. Nice.

marretics@discuss.tchncs.de · 26 pts · 32d

For real, there's so much more variety these days than there was ten or fifteen years ago. I feel like these are the golden days of gaming where everyone can find the exact niche game that they are looking for

LoafedBurrito@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 25 pts · 32d (6 replies)

Capitalism ruins another awesome part of our lives.

BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 32d (5 replies)

Indie games aren't capitalism?

KernelTale@programming.dev · 15 pts · 32d (4 replies)

Are indie better because of capitalism or despite capitalism? It's despite.

IronBird@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d

there have always been loads of shitty games, same witb movies/music etc. the bad just gets forgotten with time

BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world · -5 pts · 31d (2 replies)

I think you're mistaking capitalism with corpocracy...

Passerby6497@lemmy.world · 7 pts · 31d

"The problem isn't capitalism, it's !"

KernelTale@programming.dev · 4 pts · 31d

No, I am not. I did think about my answer despite it being short.

MeowerMisfit817@lemmy.world · 24 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Retro gaming:

Napster153@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 32d

A bunch of Indiana Jones fighting against techno-feudalists seeking to hoarde proprietary

Naryaskant@lemmy.today · 22 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Cozy Pixel Dating Exposition Building Pastel Farming Dog Quirky Fishing Rogue-lite Crafter

Alteon@lemmy.world · 9 pts · 32d

Shut up and take my money!

For real though, casual and chill-out games are so cathartic. Sure, I love my edgy soulsborne action adventures... But a couple of edibles and some Slime Rancher and I'm happy as a clam.

Pikseli@sopuli.xyz · 21 pts · 31d (1 reply)

Yeah, indie and AA-gaming are doing fine, its the AAA that is suffering. And I think they deserve it for sure: predatory practices, lack of innovation, everything looking and feeling the same... Indie and AA-games are the ones I look forward to.

Bassman1805@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 31d

Watching Paradox Interactive transition from AA into a AAA studio has been painful. They fill a niche that nobody else is really paying attention to, but they've become so entrenched that the games are really starting to feel like reskins of each other, and while I wouldn't call their DLC strategy predatory, they feel just a hair below that point.

"Historical strategy simulator" is a pretty tough genre to attack as an indie dev, though.

Allero@lemmy.today · 14 pts · 32d (3 replies)

Played Avatar: Frontiers of Pandora recently, and it struck me almost immediately:

This is, without a hint of doubt, a Ubisoft game. The setting may change, the characters are swapped, but it is always the same gameplay. Like if they figured something that works with Assassin's Creed and decided to never change it, ever.

Whatever Ubisoft action RPG you start, you always play Assassin's Creed with extra decorations. Again. And again. And again. Zero creative vision, just new textures on top of the same mechanics.

Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de · 8 pts · 31d

you always play Assassin’s Creed with extra decorations.

Or if there are guns and vehicles, it's all Far Cry :-)

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 31d (1 reply)

They used to have good writing though. How's Avatar's story?

Allero@lemmy.today · 2 pts · 31d

Well...it does have some good points. To provide an example without much spoilers, I'll take one from the early game: while some RDA humans join the Na'vi resistance, and Na'vi are happy to have some help, they keep the original Avatar's line of Pandorans' mistrust towards the humans. You are being reminded that humans (the "Sky People") might sometimes be allies, but they fight a proxy war, and you are here to protect your very homeland. This does get developed further down the story, and it's a little gem, being a rare shift against humans in the game industry. It provides a nice shift of perspective, while being true to the original story.

Or, the fact that Na'vi clans all have their own vision of war, and some are hesitant to join in again after past defeats. This adds more political complexity to the lore, as opposed to "good guys - bad guys" mentality.

Also, on the crossection of story and game mechanics, there is a disharmony debuff granted when you get too genocidal towards local wildlife. It lowers your senses, makes you a pariah among na'vi, leads to your ikran abandoning you, and more. I think it's nice, though they made a fairly poor job communicating what counts as a source of one.

On the negative side, it often feels like game design came before the story itself. A lot of it feels like they first planned where the player should go, and only then - the actual "why" behind it. This leads to some awkward turns in the story that feel like a patched afterthought.

DamienGramatacus@lemmy.world · 13 pts · 31d

I will happily pay full price for an indie or solo dev/small team game even if I end up not loving it. I will always wait for a sale for the big AAA games.

morto@piefed.social · 11 pts · 32d (2 replies)

One sad thing for me is that even in story-rich indie games I've been seeing poor dialogues and developments. This area has been the most difficult one to find good stuff for me.

almost_genocide@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 32d

That's always been a risk though.

raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world · 2 pts · 32d

Or you have great writing and then the developer turns stark raving mad (Mardek RPG).

Elting@piefed.social · 11 pts · 32d (5 replies)

Me playing Noita (the only game I will ever need) while everyone complains about gta6 which isn't even out yet.

(actually send help, I cannot make myself play other games)

Goodeye8@piefed.social · 7 pts · 32d (2 replies)

Noita is great value if you can get around the unforgiving nature of the game.

Now share your secrets with us, give us your go-to wand configuration.

Elting@piefed.social · 3 pts · 32d (1 reply)

Chainsaws on a trigger spell with an extra one at the end which gets cast at the same time as the trigger bolt to delete cast delay. Adding shit like add manas and heavyshot to the payload really make wands like that shine. Another good one is the lightbeams with the bouncing spells perk or the zig zag modifier.

Goodeye8@piefed.social · 2 pts · 32d

I have to give the bouncy concentrated light a try. My two favorites are the classic homing (ideally accelerative homing for that increased damage) rock and the multipurpose ping-pong luminous drill (usually with also add mana to never run out of mana). Those are usually guaranteed to carry me far enough to a point where I can gather all the pieces for a high damage wand.

davad@lemmy.world · 3 pts · 32d

Noita can be such a time sink. I never felt like I properly understood wand crafting. The different ways effects interact is wild.

Sabata11792@ani.social · 3 pts · 32d

785 hours, 6 wins. I am perfectly capable of dying to dirt a world over and not need The Works help.

Hubi@feddit.org · 10 pts · 32d

I kinda get it tbh, sometimes you just want the lore and gameplay of the indie title with the fidelity and scope of a AAA studio.

orca@orcas.enjoying.yachts · 10 pts · 32d

I have all of the big studios blocked on Steam. So any new dog shit they pump out that is inevitably built around nothing but extracting wealth, is never shown to me.

roboflop@feddit.uk · 9 pts · 31d (2 replies)

Just finished Momodora: Moonlit Farewell. Couple of years old now but that game had more passion put into it than anything I've played in years. Puts many AAA to shame.

korazail@lemmy.myserv.one · 3 pts · 31d (1 reply)

I still need to play that one. I played Reverie a few years ago and that was an amazing game that is still in my top recommendations.

roboflop@feddit.uk · 2 pts · 31d

Can also recommend Minoria from (I think) the same dev. I believe unrelated story but very similar feel.

blindbunny@lemmy.ml · 7 pts · 32d (1 reply)

If they are advertising their game that money that could have made the game better.

boonhet@sopuli.xyz · 3 pts · 32d

But then nobody knows about the game, it won't sell well, and there's no money to make the next one

rodneylives@lemmy.world · 6 pts · 31d

There are all these people who think it's only a video game if it involves big fightymen killing things. That's hyperbole (they could instead be big sportsmen doing sports), but not by much.

These are the people who view graphics as the be-and-end-all of a game's quality. There are more kinds of games than anyone could count, but you wouldn't know it by asking those people.

Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 6 pts · 31d (3 replies)

Tried God Of War, lost patience after 30 minutes - too much of a "guided experience" for my taste.

Picked up Valheim again for my 6(?)th run of it and only lost patience with it maybe a month (in real time) later.

Been doing Saelig since (got it as a promo from GoG) but now have so much money in that game and such a steady way to make more that it's not really fun anymore.

Just updated Songs Of Syx to v0.71 and preparing for a new run on that.

I've been gaming for almost 4 decades, originally in a ZX Spectrum and after than mostly on the PC (tried modern consoles with the WII, but found it a bit meh).

For me the modern AAA gaming experience is seldom as much fun as some Indie games out there and AAA games now tend to have much less replayability: AAA games in the last 1 or 2 decades mainly have fixed game areas with fixed and reasonably simple game rules so once I've seen it and done it I tend to still remember how it was for many years after playing it, so the exploration fun isn't there anymore in a new run (in my experience it takes maybe a decade before I can come back to the best such games and have fun with it again) whilst many Indie games have procedurally generated playing fields and/or complex enough game rules that after I've played so much of it that I got fed up, it takes me a lot less time to have fun in a new run.

Even supposedly great games like Red Dead Redemption II turned out to, for me, be engaging and interesting for far less time than things like, say Terraria - sure, the former starts a lot more impressive, but the fun goes down a lot faster whilst the latter just keeps throwing challanges at you. Also having played it until you're fed up, some months later Terraria is fun again for another run, whilst if you go back to it a year later, for RDR II you quickly remember what's were in the game area and how to go around doing stuff, so the "discovery" part of fun isn't there anymore (this especially so for the story: it's really only interesting once)

Mind you, there are actually older AAA games for which this doesn't apply. For example, I can still go back to the Sims 3, start a new game and it will be fun for quite a while.

I think that the problem with modern AAA games is that far too much was invested into glitzy visuals and a heavilly curated game area (not just visually but even things like scripted events) and not enough in engaging game play, plus I get the impression that game play tends to be low complexity so as to be accessible to more people, and for me after 4 decades as a gamer, simpler game rules are usually boring unless the interact in complex ways. Further, all that curating (read, "tight control") of the game experience goes against a great source of fun in games - emergent gameplay (how the interaction between game rules and between them and the game environment can create varied and complex situations that need different solutions) - something which, IMHO, is part of the reason why in some games multiplayer is a lot of fun when singleplayer is not (humans are great at creating the novel and unexpected) and which works especially well with game with tons of things which interact with each other and with procedurally generated game spaces.

ech@lemmy.ca · 3 pts · 31d (1 reply)

too much of a “guided experience” for my taste.

This shit drives me crazy, and Sony games are far and away the worst offenders - Spider-man, GoW, Death Stranding 2, etc. Otherwise great and enjoyable games damn near ruined by constant nagging and pointers for the most obvious things, like "helpful" reminders to get to the objective you're already going towards. I have other problems with Death Stranding 2, but that was one of the bigger ones. Stupid doll man wouldn't. shut. up.

grrgyle@slrpnk.net · 2 pts · 31d

As I recall The Last of Us two found a pretty organic sweet spot. The character you're with would just make oblique observations if you were stuck for a while, increasingly explicit, until finally an actual icon would appear in the UI pointing you in the right direction (configurable).

I really do find hifi environments too busy to make out "significant" features, and if you're not going to splash yellow paint on everything some kind of hint system is nice.

Source: I'm not smart

DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 3 pts · 31d

God of war Ragnarok gets even worse with the backseating

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 5 pts · 32d (4 replies)

Lets be real:

Most console gamers, console primary gamers... have no idea what an indie game even actually is, let alone how many of them there really are.

(Indie means self-published, btw... Independent -> Indie)

The expections to this are the ones that specifically hunt for really niche, not advertised things, or go hard into emulators.

Only true console peasants are in hysterical despair right now, or denial, or whatever stage of grief.

If your brain can only process passive consumption, if you're not capable of or willing to actively seek out specific games, find out which ones actually jive with you, put in some effort?

Then you have an abusive parasocial relationship with a or multiple corporate entities, which is mostly just sad.

Maybe try like, actually talking to someone, an actual person, who actually knows games, instead of just following the herd and listening to marketing branded as 'journalism'?

Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 31d (3 replies)

While there is some truth to this, as an almost exclusive console gamer, I play hella indie games. SolarPunk this month, Ive also 300 hours in stardew valley, Indika was a cool story game, inKONBINI was really nice too, Im trying to think of others, The Long Dark, Limbo, (just downloaded Inside yesterday) but Ive played so many smaller indie games on console.

I recognize the monopoly/issues, I dont pay for gamepass, but I do have access. I have played so many smaller/indie games, I might not have tried because it is on gamepass. Ive even bought some after trying them there first, like HouseFlipper 1&2.

Yes Ive heard people say I play videogames all the time, and Ill be like, oh yeah what do you play? and they say, Call of Duty, and I know to exit the conversation. But, we out here, I activley try the smaller games, all the time.

The only games I have on steam (we have a Lonovo Leigon Go) is Civ 6, Paralives and Rust. It's kind of a shitty set up I have, with a tiny tiny bluetooth keyboard. It hurts my hands so I dont play it as much. And Rust hasnt worked since the jungle update anyway, I get like 25fps. Its stupid

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 31d (2 replies)

You are precisely the kind of exception I was trying to describe.

I know not all console primary gamers pretty much only play games from well known publishers... but most of them mostly do, as you seem to agree.

'Casuals', as we used to say, though the vocabulary has changed in the last 20 something years, so thats probably not a great word to use these days, as 'casual' is now more of a genre or an attribute, games that tend to not require intense/precise input sequences, or very much thinking, are designed to be low intensity, low frustration.

Back then, we meant it as 'casually interested in the hobby of gaming', as opposed to some kind of diehard nerd that was always looking intently for the best or the weirdest or rarest, or something like that.

Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 31d (1 reply)

I hear you. Really. I dont think Ive ever seen a CoD type player play their game with low frustration though lol But I understand. Felt the need to voice "it's not all of us!" is all :)

sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 pts · 31d

Yeah haha, 'casual' as a word for that... I tried to expand on the meaning confusion via stealth edit, I may not have been fast enough lol.

But yeah, a lot of bog standard dudebro games are not casual in the sense of uh ... sweatiness?

But they are casual in the sense of 'you only have to be casually aware of video games to know... CoD, or Zelda, or Halo'... like, opposed to niche, basically.

sartalon@lemmy.world · 5 pts · 31d

The games I always remember/return to the most are the ones that had an amazing storyline.

That doesn't require a huge budget. But it does require the developer to love the game too.

So many companies are run from an excel spreadsheet. No true leadership or vision.

grrgyle@slrpnk.net · 5 pts · 31d

I'm having more fun with Supplice than any AAA shooter since... idk, 2016 at least.

jj4211@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 31d

It's a logical outcome. The big studios are risk-averse. Why bother with something that hasn't been already 'proven', and also if they think something has gone "out of fashion", then similarly don't risk revisiting something that will make them look dated.

The pleasant creative outcomes stem from people who want to do it for the sake of doing it rather than constrained by predicted business results. It's by no means a guarantee of quality, a lot of Indie stuff sucks, but certainly being overly business minded inhibits anything 'different' coming out.

JoMiran@lemmy.ml · 4 pts · 32d (1 reply)

People do not actually want games that are original and know what they want to be from AAA game studios. Bungie made Marathon. It is a game with a unique aesthetic, non-apologetic play style that is excellent for those who enjoy that gameplay, deep lore, etc. It flopped and it is constantly being asked to change and have more "mass appeal".

Elting@piefed.social · 1 pts · 32d

There is something to be said for the fact that consumers always want more of the same. Any time something new and good is made, the first question people ask is “why arent there any sequels.” Almost by necessity, companies will provide an increasingly diluted product to hock at these insatiable individuals. Just ask McDonalds why they never change their fries.

AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world · 4 pts · 31d

Me, watching at the pages upon pages of games I haven't even touched yet in my collection... Even if half of them are complete duds, and half of what's left is kind of meh, I've got enough to be entertained forever even if all gaming studios vanish overnight.

Tenderizer@aussie.zone · 2 pts · 31d

I don't even have time for all the great indies.

Like seriously, that's a real problem. I had to remove Deltarune from my wishlist. DELTARUNE.

Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 32d

I mean yes but there are also good games coming out that I wouldn't call indie games. You just have to know your own taste and need a little bit of experience about which studios will fuck you over and which studio will most certainly deliver what you want.

wopalopa@lemmy.world · 1 pts · 32d

i love indie. but sometimes i want eye candy game that excel in everything.

sure they remake a lot of stuff but most remake fail to capture the essence what makes it great

nroth@lemmy.world · -1 pts · 31d

The indie games often don't look as nice

alcea@feddit.org · -5 pts · 32d (1 reply)

The last games I finished were both Remakes (last one: Another Code Recollection)

Aside KingdomHearts getting a Switch remake release the onyl thing entertaining me are GBA and NDS on the RetroidPocketFlip2 ... Switch2 ? Collecting Dust .. (Altho finishing MMSFLC would be needed. Yet another Remake)

Maybe I should make my own game. Good thing new games are trash, that way it won't hurt not being able to preserve em anymore

Modern gaming like modern TV and Series and books are very boring. All targeting the low attention span of smartphone zombies

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 31d

Your troll needs work.

zaphod@sopuli.xyz · -8 pts · 32d (3 replies)

Let's say I'm not interested in side-scrollers, that's already removing at least 50% of all indie games for me. Throw in games with pixel looks and we're down to maybe 10%.

AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social · 6 pts · 32d

Saying that 50% of the indie games are side scrollers is like saying that 50% of the AAA games are FPS... No wait, that is actually true.

Absolute_Axoltl@feddit.uk · 3 pts · 32d

Fine, but with that said saying side-scrollers is incredibly broad. Cuphead is very different to Pentiment which is nothing like Pizza Tower and that doesn't share much with Replaced, and so on. There are plenty of genres represin Indie circles from FPS's to rpgs, point and clicks, simulation, platformers, Metroidvania's, open world adventures and far more that I can't be fucked to think of. The point being if indie games aren't for you then that's cool but at least be honest and not just dismiss wiith sweeping generalisations.

Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it · 2 pts · 32d

Side scrollers is very generic, what type of side scrollers?

whereitsat@lemmy.zip · -20 pts · 32d (9 replies)

to play devil's advocate: if i want 1990-2005 era graphics i'd rather just play games from that era because they were better.

i want GOOD AAA games in 2026, just like i want good hollywood blockbusters in 2026, just like i want good pop music in 2026.

i don't want to spend 5485080485 hours sorting through garbage to find a $2 gem. anyone over 40 knows this pain; zoomers are in denial and make memes like this to justify their pathetic lives and smugly look down on everyone who isn't willing to go the distance for a fleeting experience that's lacking in comparison to some crappy dos game from 35 years ago, like martian memorandum.

brucethemoose@lemmy.world · 10 pts · 32d (1 reply)

You're thinking of a different time; there's a deluge of indie and "AA" games with graphical fidelity that puts most AAAs to shame; and that's if you set aside their art direction.

This isn't 2005. Devs have access to some fantastic off-the-shelf engines. And honestly many AAAs footgun themselves trying to wrangle in-house engines.


Now, the sheer scale of something like RDR2 or an AssCreed; that's still in the realm of AAAs. But that's getting cheaper too, and I would cite Kingdom Come Deliverance 2/BG3 as prime examples: those are big studios, but they're absolutely microscropic compared to (say) Ubisoft or BGS. Yet they made stupendously large, dense, refined worlds.

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 31d

AAA studios bring the polish. That's the only thing I really miss from big games, because as they lost the weirdo genius games designers, they lost the only edge they had over indie games. At least for me. Obviously they still have ad budgets, but... Ad block ftw!

Burghler@sh.itjust.works · 4 pts · 32d (3 replies)

It is trivially easy on steam or gog to simply filter for indie games and just click through each ones that are well reviewed. Especially on steam it's brain-dead simple browse these. If you're having too much a problem with it just tell me your taste and I'll give you a game that's objectively good.

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 1 pts · 31d (2 replies)

Cyberpunk 2077, Fallout 2, Fallout NV, Civilisation, Rimworld, Privateer, Minecraft.

What's my current indie goodness?

Burghler@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 31d (1 reply)

Noita, Verho or Lunacid, Path of Achra, Gloomwood, and maybe Fear and Hunger if you like the atmosphere and pain, idk if this one is Indie but check out Cataclismo

teslekova@sh.itjust.works · 2 pts · 31d

Excellent, I haven't heard of any of these! I will check them out. Tyvm.

Dyskolos@lemmy.zip · 2 pts · 32d

As if all indie-games look like 1990s. I'm over 50 and went more and more indie over the years as AAA just does the same grey-washed boring pc-crap over and over again. Also sloppy, shitty and buggy. Rare exceptions may apply.

Name 3 really(!) Good AAA since January? Not good by sales, but good. And then try to find ONE that was also creative and dared to bring something fresh. Yeah exactly. Fresh doesn't appease investors.

Hoimo@ani.social · 2 pts · 32d

It's not just the graphics that improved in the last 20 years. Modern game engines created a floor of quality where input just works, basic configuration just works, autosave just works. All these little conveniences around the game itself that you barely think about, until you play a shooter from 20 years ago and the buttons are mapped weirdly and there's no way to remap.

Herr_S_aus_H@lemmy.zip · 1 pts · 32d

Yeah, right. I think the place for being useless and unproductive is not here. At least I hope it is.