These kinds of dramatic, messianic headlines are not helpful. That is not the most likely scenario, obviously. Responsible news outlets should not amplify these harmful, fringe opinions.
I get that people are afraid of change, which some countries do a bad job at protecting people from. That's a separate (political) issue. I'm personally not a fan of how the U.S. handles such transformations. However, that aside, wouldn't it be cool if we could do more ambitious things and have better quality of life?
For example, embodied AI will be able to take over household chores. It can already do very basic programming chores (babysit this, wait for that and kick this off if it works or try that if not) that don't make sense to automate with a shell script.
Unpopular opinion, but when competing for a scarce resource, everyone pays more because it is more scarce. Then more gets created (at least in the case of power) and the system equalizes.
It would be better if there was a provision to cover the spike for ratepayers for some number of years.
I'm glad these services exist for the disabled. My wife and I were just talking about this.
These kinds of dramatic, messianic headlines are not helpful. That is not the most likely scenario, obviously. Responsible news outlets should not amplify these harmful, fringe opinions.
Who uses nano?
"You must be AI" is such an intellectually lazy response to this comment that I did not even anticipate it
I get that people are afraid of change, which some countries do a bad job at protecting people from. That's a separate (political) issue. I'm personally not a fan of how the U.S. handles such transformations. However, that aside, wouldn't it be cool if we could do more ambitious things and have better quality of life?
For example, embodied AI will be able to take over household chores. It can already do very basic programming chores (babysit this, wait for that and kick this off if it works or try that if not) that don't make sense to automate with a shell script.
Best we can do is hallucinate suicide rationale
Why do people hate AI so much? I find it genuinely very useful
I just had to take this a few days ago Tastes very nice, actually.
She's not my favorite singer by any means, but it's still sad.
They get 0.28 that goes to an affiliated charity to spend money talking about how great that grocery store is.
Too many teeth in that smile
The indie games often don't look as nice
I always liked 10 and 15
Unpopular opinion, but when competing for a scarce resource, everyone pays more because it is more scarce. Then more gets created (at least in the case of power) and the system equalizes.
It would be better if there was a provision to cover the spike for ratepayers for some number of years.
Why not standard time?
They don't make money on the hardware, only on PixelOS
Central Park is the best nature because people DO clean up the sticks
Its basically a credential that they refuse to let you just test for to justify the price and the institution around it
Some of us are clumsy
Explaining it to people. It's hard, but people eventually understand