Laws is easier to say than well established theories :) seriously if you whole beef is simply the well established term i think you're trying to hard to find fault
The German thing was quite suspicious though, the mayor of the city changed, Microsoft announced that they were building a new center of excellence or something in the town and suddenly Linux was too hard...
And yet all islamic states seem to do horrible things to women / lgbt based on religious tenants.
Just because some are less bad than others doesn't mean it isn't a pattern.
Your own wiki link includes this near the start
There are, however, punishments for various types of Zina (unlawful sexual relations) in Islamic law. Zina includes both fornication (when they are unmarried), for which the punishment is flogging, and adultery (when they are married, but not to each other), for which the punishment is death by stoning.
I guess that it might be unfair to paint with the exact some brush but its a brush that looks quite similar for each of them.
UAE does seem to be partly an exception to this however there are still things such as
Emirati law requires women to obtain a male guardian's consent to marry. Additionally, a husband has legal rights to request his wife's obedience, and women can be deemed "disobedient" if they take outside employment without their husband's consent
Etc
It's probably more of a fundamentalist state issue than only Islamic states but it doesn't change the end result
Well sure, if the local Methodist minister had a rule book that said child sex abuse is OK. Maybe it does, considering how often it happens.
I wasn't talking about individual Muslims.
Was talking about nations that are Islamic states and follow Sharia law. They all seems to be restrictive on personal rights especially if you happen to be a woman or lgbt.
It's a growing issue with a lot of different cultures these days but i personally think its a bit disingenuous to suggest its islamaphobic to highlight the treatment of women in Islamic states
Wasn't talking about individual Muslims.
Was talking about nations that are Islamic states and follow Sharia law. They all seems to be restrictive on personal rights especially if you happen to be a woman or lgbt.
That's what is happening but it not happening fast enough.
Batteries are great but unless you build out a LOT of them and combine with intelligent grids and power consumption you aren't covering the output of a nuclear power plant.
If you are decommissioning a nuclear plant then you had better have alternative power available otherwise you end up like Germany who did that and then had pull a lot of power from Frances nuclear excess as well as burning extra gas for power.
I like renewables, I have solar + battery at home, I've built flow battery models and fuel cells to experiment with.
I've written software to turn my house (and hopefully include my neighbours soon) into a virtual power plant based on my houses output as well as the wholesale market price. It's difficult to manage when people expect a light to turn on at any time they want.
I just get tired of people saying renewables are the only option and when it inevitably isn't just yet having to burn more fossil fuels when the existing nuclear plant can continue
Who is paying for it? I have solar and battery at home. It cost me an amount that a lot of people can't afford and its rare that I don't have to pull from the grid every day while at other times the power company is paying me to take energy from the grid because there is too much renewable energy being produced.
My country is building out battery parks as much as its able to.
Every site seems to get bogged down with nimby protesters who all seems to want renewable energy but not near them.
I am all for renewable energy, I just think a lot of people don't understand the scale of whats required to replace a single nuclear power plant.
Ffs this is exactly what I mean....
To power Switzerland for only 6 hours (38GWh), you would need approximately 30,000 to 35,000 utility-scale batteries.
Where and how exactly are you building them?
So you're happy to go without power after sunset then?
Until we have more storage options or diversified sources then that's what you get.
Or do you think it will all happen by magic?
Maybe try being less rude unless you have a solution that doesn't just involve wishful thinking.
What do you use them for? I use them day to day for significant automation hooked into a rag tool and several custom mcp services. They are absolutely amazing but with some serious flaws that do require significant guard rails and human in the loop points.
They are obviously over hyped and being used as an excuse by shitty CEOs but to call them useless is a mistake I think
What about low speed collisions where the impact does kill you but your head hitting the curb like a melon does?
My city has 20mph zone in most locations now so most collisions aren't fatal directly but you're still going to hit the ground
Well yeah, its a hard choice but that's what happens.
Just because its a hard choice doesn't mean it doesn't need to be made if the alternative is a lifetime of unhappiness.
Im not American so i simply cant relate to the shooting aspect of it although from ive seen are mostly politcal/racial rather than misogynistic. I dont have a great deal of knowledge of it though so happy to admit i could be wrong with it.
There are a lot of garbage men out there, no doubt about it. There are also a lot of lost men that fall for the tate type crap.
What i really dont get are the conservative women who support it all. Why?
This has drifted a bit from the original subject and i dont want to end up inadvertantly linking lack of housework to domestic violence!
My point is that I think far too many people tolerate but complain about a situation without doing anything to fix it.
Obv when it comes to violence it needs ti be viewed through a different lense
Some women may believe that changing it is just too much work- it’s not an immutable nor innate property of men that they don’t cook or clean or know anything about the children, but changing that would be an overwhelming amount of work. If the man’s not interested in changing anything, it’s even more daunting, and may damage the relationship
That's what I mean though. Why stay or care about damaging the relationship? Sunk cost fallacy. Some times a hard choice needs to be made. This choice should be made before children/mortgages etc.
There's the old stereotype of men enter a relationship thinking the women wont change and women enter a relationship hoping the man will.
The thing i don't get is why do women put up with it?
I think some of it boils down to different standards, generally the neater/cleaner person will expect the other person to change their behaviour.
When I hear people moaning about significant others doing nothing I do think that it takes both people to allow it.
Most people will live together for a while before marriage/kids so you have no excuse to complain if you know what they're like and still marry etc
Don't forget smart and assertive
Laws is easier to say than well established theories :) seriously if you whole beef is simply the well established term i think you're trying to hard to find fault
The German thing was quite suspicious though, the mayor of the city changed, Microsoft announced that they were building a new center of excellence or something in the town and suddenly Linux was too hard...
And yet all islamic states seem to do horrible things to women / lgbt based on religious tenants.
Just because some are less bad than others doesn't mean it isn't a pattern. Your own wiki link includes this near the start
I guess that it might be unfair to paint with the exact some brush but its a brush that looks quite similar for each of them.
UAE does seem to be partly an exception to this however there are still things such as
It's probably more of a fundamentalist state issue than only Islamic states but it doesn't change the end result
Well sure, if the local Methodist minister had a rule book that said child sex abuse is OK. Maybe it does, considering how often it happens. I wasn't talking about individual Muslims. Was talking about nations that are Islamic states and follow Sharia law. They all seems to be restrictive on personal rights especially if you happen to be a woman or lgbt. It's a growing issue with a lot of different cultures these days but i personally think its a bit disingenuous to suggest its islamaphobic to highlight the treatment of women in Islamic states
Wasn't talking about individual Muslims. Was talking about nations that are Islamic states and follow Sharia law. They all seems to be restrictive on personal rights especially if you happen to be a woman or lgbt.
That's what is happening but it not happening fast enough. Batteries are great but unless you build out a LOT of them and combine with intelligent grids and power consumption you aren't covering the output of a nuclear power plant. If you are decommissioning a nuclear plant then you had better have alternative power available otherwise you end up like Germany who did that and then had pull a lot of power from Frances nuclear excess as well as burning extra gas for power. I like renewables, I have solar + battery at home, I've built flow battery models and fuel cells to experiment with. I've written software to turn my house (and hopefully include my neighbours soon) into a virtual power plant based on my houses output as well as the wholesale market price. It's difficult to manage when people expect a light to turn on at any time they want. I just get tired of people saying renewables are the only option and when it inevitably isn't just yet having to burn more fossil fuels when the existing nuclear plant can continue
Who is paying for it? I have solar and battery at home. It cost me an amount that a lot of people can't afford and its rare that I don't have to pull from the grid every day while at other times the power company is paying me to take energy from the grid because there is too much renewable energy being produced.
My country is building out battery parks as much as its able to. Every site seems to get bogged down with nimby protesters who all seems to want renewable energy but not near them. I am all for renewable energy, I just think a lot of people don't understand the scale of whats required to replace a single nuclear power plant.
Ffs this is exactly what I mean.... To power Switzerland for only 6 hours (38GWh), you would need approximately 30,000 to 35,000 utility-scale batteries. Where and how exactly are you building them?
So you're happy to go without power after sunset then?
Until we have more storage options or diversified sources then that's what you get. Or do you think it will all happen by magic?
Maybe try being less rude unless you have a solution that doesn't just involve wishful thinking.
Erm arent both Saudi Arabia and isis Muslim/Islam? How is that Islam phobic?
What do you use them for? I use them day to day for significant automation hooked into a rag tool and several custom mcp services. They are absolutely amazing but with some serious flaws that do require significant guard rails and human in the loop points.
They are obviously over hyped and being used as an excuse by shitty CEOs but to call them useless is a mistake I think
Yeah you're right we should never try to do anything because some might fail. How many cancer treatments fail, I guess we should stop trying those too
Also isn't there pending corruption charges against him that are constantly put on hold because they are at war?
What about low speed collisions where the impact does kill you but your head hitting the curb like a melon does? My city has 20mph zone in most locations now so most collisions aren't fatal directly but you're still going to hit the ground
Well yeah, its a hard choice but that's what happens.
Just because its a hard choice doesn't mean it doesn't need to be made if the alternative is a lifetime of unhappiness.
Im not American so i simply cant relate to the shooting aspect of it although from ive seen are mostly politcal/racial rather than misogynistic. I dont have a great deal of knowledge of it though so happy to admit i could be wrong with it. There are a lot of garbage men out there, no doubt about it. There are also a lot of lost men that fall for the tate type crap. What i really dont get are the conservative women who support it all. Why?
This has drifted a bit from the original subject and i dont want to end up inadvertantly linking lack of housework to domestic violence! My point is that I think far too many people tolerate but complain about a situation without doing anything to fix it. Obv when it comes to violence it needs ti be viewed through a different lense
Threaten to do what?
If women don't put up with it en masse then there is fuck all men can do about it. Mass action is how things change
That's what I mean though. Why stay or care about damaging the relationship? Sunk cost fallacy. Some times a hard choice needs to be made. This choice should be made before children/mortgages etc. There's the old stereotype of men enter a relationship thinking the women wont change and women enter a relationship hoping the man will.
The thing i don't get is why do women put up with it?
I think some of it boils down to different standards, generally the neater/cleaner person will expect the other person to change their behaviour. When I hear people moaning about significant others doing nothing I do think that it takes both people to allow it. Most people will live together for a while before marriage/kids so you have no excuse to complain if you know what they're like and still marry etc