I agree with you on the concept that it is a normal bridge with a reasonable budget. The Changtai Yangtze river bridge was from what I can find about 8.5 billion USD while the Iran war to date has cost 37.5 billion from what I can find with some saying over 100 billion.
At some point you can start forgoing concrete for much more expensive and exotic materials. The Francis Scott Key Bridge has been broken for over two years at this point with plans to have it replaced by 2030, meaning 1/3rd of the time to complete has already elapsed without construction. Building something in a third the time with over 10 times the budget doesn't seem as unreasonable as asking nine women to have one baby.
It makes me feel weird about people that barely see babies as property, the name attached is the value not the person who didn't ask to be born and needs help.
(To be clear I'm not saying you do this specifically, it's more a cultural thing where people will see other people as unworthy unless their name is on it)
Even if humanity doesn't go extinct, we are one of earth's big extinction events. If anything it could be argued that humanity being wiped out would save more species in the long run.
To e clear I don't disagree with you, I just don't see the point in enshrining species alive now as the most deserving over potential species in the future simply because they have emotional value to humans that will be dead.
Sure but the framing for conservatism in this thread is PragerU who absolutely see it all as the same thing.
Just like I can go into topics about digital games and rightfully point our bluray and dvd are digital media but all I'm really doing is shouting at clouds like an old man about a technicality.
Also the number of developers and amount of money put into something doesn't make it is necessarily better. I almost want to think that fewer developers and less money on Windows is a good thing considering Microslop only ever wants to increase operating costs in order to make more revenue.
For me the irony is how she was leading the AI team and now has to go to Xbox and talk about how memory and storage is just so expensive for some reason.
Honestly I was never going to get in on gamepass no matter how good a deal it was because I would lose access to games no matter how long I had been paying to play them. In the same respect I don't like leasing a car, I would rather buy used and accept all the problems that come out of it because eventually I could stop making payments.
I can see why people would enjoy it but it was never for me.
I'll be short with you.: I don't care how much nicer starlink is, putting that many satellites into low earth orbit all the time is not good for the climate. The few thousand people on ships at any given time can wait to stream high def porn or download it while at port. All the needed uses of the internet can be met via slow higher orbiting satellites.
Wait so you're saying the ships, just the ships moving across the pacific are enough reason to have low earth orbit satellites in such quantity they impede things as simple as looking at the stars? The ships can get internet from higher earth orbit satellites that don't have to be constantly replaced. We haven't been choosing between internet and no internet with starlink, there has been satallite internet way before starlink and there will be way after. All it takes is a less cooperative FAA not allowing so many rocket launches for the AI nazi company and slowly holes form in the coverage as the satellites burn up.
Idk if we can call first past the post, winner take all, electoral college, elections as comparable to most European elections. If anything, the US president is lawfully closer to a king than many modern democracies.
Yeah a game with 10 years of free updates and no microtransactions, Rockstar would never.
I agree with you on the concept that it is a normal bridge with a reasonable budget. The Changtai Yangtze river bridge was from what I can find about 8.5 billion USD while the Iran war to date has cost 37.5 billion from what I can find with some saying over 100 billion.
At some point you can start forgoing concrete for much more expensive and exotic materials. The Francis Scott Key Bridge has been broken for over two years at this point with plans to have it replaced by 2030, meaning 1/3rd of the time to complete has already elapsed without construction. Building something in a third the time with over 10 times the budget doesn't seem as unreasonable as asking nine women to have one baby.
Sure but if you took the billions and billions spent on attacking Iran and instead rebuilt the bridge it could have been done by now.
It makes me feel weird about people that barely see babies as property, the name attached is the value not the person who didn't ask to be born and needs help.
(To be clear I'm not saying you do this specifically, it's more a cultural thing where people will see other people as unworthy unless their name is on it)
I honestly can't remember what EA game I last played. I think the last one I was interested in was Anthem and that went poorly.
In this hypothetical you'd have to want to play an EA game
The orphan crushing machine strikes again.
Similar stuff happens with some charities too and the amount of money eaten up by administrative fees.
Even if humanity doesn't go extinct, we are one of earth's big extinction events. If anything it could be argued that humanity being wiped out would save more species in the long run.
To e clear I don't disagree with you, I just don't see the point in enshrining species alive now as the most deserving over potential species in the future simply because they have emotional value to humans that will be dead.
Sure but the framing for conservatism in this thread is PragerU who absolutely see it all as the same thing.
Just like I can go into topics about digital games and rightfully point our bluray and dvd are digital media but all I'm really doing is shouting at clouds like an old man about a technicality.
That's a lot of words comparing capitalism to a parasitic relationship then saying if we wish it wasn't parasitic enough it wouldn't be.
Sure but capitalists want to own the sun for renewables.
Also the number of developers and amount of money put into something doesn't make it is necessarily better. I almost want to think that fewer developers and less money on Windows is a good thing considering Microslop only ever wants to increase operating costs in order to make more revenue.
Maybe stock but people tune older cars to run on E85 all the time
For me the irony is how she was leading the AI team and now has to go to Xbox and talk about how memory and storage is just so expensive for some reason.
High speed internet from constantly decaying satellites is not necessary.
Honestly I was never going to get in on gamepass no matter how good a deal it was because I would lose access to games no matter how long I had been paying to play them. In the same respect I don't like leasing a car, I would rather buy used and accept all the problems that come out of it because eventually I could stop making payments.
I can see why people would enjoy it but it was never for me.
I'll be short with you.: I don't care how much nicer starlink is, putting that many satellites into low earth orbit all the time is not good for the climate. The few thousand people on ships at any given time can wait to stream high def porn or download it while at port. All the needed uses of the internet can be met via slow higher orbiting satellites.
Wait so you're saying the ships, just the ships moving across the pacific are enough reason to have low earth orbit satellites in such quantity they impede things as simple as looking at the stars? The ships can get internet from higher earth orbit satellites that don't have to be constantly replaced. We haven't been choosing between internet and no internet with starlink, there has been satallite internet way before starlink and there will be way after. All it takes is a less cooperative FAA not allowing so many rocket launches for the AI nazi company and slowly holes form in the coverage as the satellites burn up.
Idk if we can call first past the post, winner take all, electoral college, elections as comparable to most European elections. If anything, the US president is lawfully closer to a king than many modern democracies.
Give it 50 years of replacing satellites and I am willing to bet a one time install of fiber would have been cheaper.