If you won't accept the results of an investigation, then why call for one in the first place. You can do one or the other, but both is dumb. Don't move the goalposts, just admit that you think X happened and you are now rejecting any evidence you disagree with.
My point is that it's very odd to focus on the Democrats specifically when Republicans brought the bills up for a vote, and Republicans also basically unanimously voted for it...more Republicans voted for it than Democrats, and a Republican president is signing the bill.
Republicans pushed it through, Democrats voted for it also. You are allowed to criticize either party for voting for it, but you are being inaccurate if you are saying the Democrats are disproportionately responsible for passage, as the term "pushed it through" means.
They just didn't investigate Boeing about it because the police investigation determined they weren't involved.
If you truly believe there should be investigations, you have to accept when the results of the investigations don't match your expectations. That's why we have investigations.
My town had an extremely generically named "spa" that I passed by all the time and joked that it must be a drug ring and I found out that no actually they were a human trafficking ring and they got shut down by the police.
It's not pearl clutching, I'm saying it's not a well designed comic. If he wanted it to be about Covid, he could have drawn it that way.
As seen by how you're saying "no, people died of Covid" and other people are saying "no, people are being deported" and you both are at least notionally interpreting this political cartoon that has labels, none of which mention any of that proves you have to make one too many leaps in logic.
It's just generic "Trump bad" which like I said, I agree with, I just don't like the cartoon.
I hate the schadenfreude journalism. I will never meet this guy, I don't care how he feels any more than some random South Dakotan. The reason he's relevant is his outsized impact on government and the country, tell me about that.
If you think in terms of "lanes" AOC is the only left wing potential candidate on there, 21% support is actually not persuasive in her odds to actually be the candidate.
I feel very good about her chances to run the Bernie playbook and end with a top 3 amount of delegates but in an actual primary the lanes would clear up as people drop out and it is hard to see her consolidating support from like, Gavin Newsome.
I'm not the hypocrite here...neither of us are doing anything that would protect the American population from a rapist insurrectionist corrupted by Russia, I'm just admitting it while you're pretending your impotent wails are doing anything so you can look down on everyone else.
So you're saying they're yelling at the liberal to fix the boat and then the guy with the gun throws them off the boat? Doesn't sound like you're disagreeing with me.
"You should have saved up a bit more and bought something less gaudy"
Did you know Angels in the Outfield has a 31% on rottentomatoes? I'm scared to watch it again because I remember it as a perfect movie.
Forgot to say "sudo"
If you won't accept the results of an investigation, then why call for one in the first place. You can do one or the other, but both is dumb. Don't move the goalposts, just admit that you think X happened and you are now rejecting any evidence you disagree with.
My point is that it's very odd to focus on the Democrats specifically when Republicans brought the bills up for a vote, and Republicans also basically unanimously voted for it...more Republicans voted for it than Democrats, and a Republican president is signing the bill.
Republicans pushed it through, Democrats voted for it also. You are allowed to criticize either party for voting for it, but you are being inaccurate if you are saying the Democrats are disproportionately responsible for passage, as the term "pushed it through" means.
Ok so 2 people out of 535 in Republican-controlled Congress voted against it, how is it accurate to say "Democrats pushed it through"?
Republicans pass legislation through the two houses of Congress they entirely control, a Republican president signs it.
You: "The Democrats pushed this through."
They exist for the important work of censoring critics.
There was a police investigation.
They just didn't investigate Boeing about it because the police investigation determined they weren't involved.
If you truly believe there should be investigations, you have to accept when the results of the investigations don't match your expectations. That's why we have investigations.
My town had an extremely generically named "spa" that I passed by all the time and joked that it must be a drug ring and I found out that no actually they were a human trafficking ring and they got shut down by the police.
It's not pearl clutching, I'm saying it's not a well designed comic. If he wanted it to be about Covid, he could have drawn it that way.
As seen by how you're saying "no, people died of Covid" and other people are saying "no, people are being deported" and you both are at least notionally interpreting this political cartoon that has labels, none of which mention any of that proves you have to make one too many leaps in logic.
It's just generic "Trump bad" which like I said, I agree with, I just don't like the cartoon.
It was rejected for being extremely distasteful.
It's not wrong, but there's no tie in to the administration that makes the image need to be the scene of thousands of people murdered by terrorists.
I hate the schadenfreude journalism. I will never meet this guy, I don't care how he feels any more than some random South Dakotan. The reason he's relevant is his outsized impact on government and the country, tell me about that.
The smeg CFG01, so good I call it the mother of all grinders. A real smeg ma.
It's harder in places without the incredible subway system of NYC.
If you think in terms of "lanes" AOC is the only left wing potential candidate on there, 21% support is actually not persuasive in her odds to actually be the candidate.
I feel very good about her chances to run the Bernie playbook and end with a top 3 amount of delegates but in an actual primary the lanes would clear up as people drop out and it is hard to see her consolidating support from like, Gavin Newsome.
McSorleys in NYC was men only until a 1970 legal ruling, and didn't have a women's restroom until 1986.
Their motto prior to 1970 was "Good Ale, Raw Onions and No Ladies"
Tiffany was similarly not used as a first name until Tiffany & Co, and particularly Breakfast at Tiffany's, the 1958 novel/1961 movie.
The "Tiffany" from Tiffany & Co was a last name, and that owner was one of a handful of Tiffany's in the world at the time of the founding.
I'm not the hypocrite here...neither of us are doing anything that would protect the American population from a rapist insurrectionist corrupted by Russia, I'm just admitting it while you're pretending your impotent wails are doing anything so you can look down on everyone else.
So you're saying they're yelling at the liberal to fix the boat and then the guy with the gun throws them off the boat? Doesn't sound like you're disagreeing with me.