I just have a hard time believing they can keep him both alive and sufficiently lucid enough to be viable for 2028. He's struggling to hold it together through an entire Nazi rally now.
This is the shit that is put out there to keep people from being involved in politics because "why bother if both sides are the same?" and to deflect blame from the fact that the right is objectively worse in every fucking way. The Democratic party has a lot of problems and is in need of of a huge pull to the left, but it is better than the alternative. Dismissing it this way solves nothing.
People on the left have a belief that society should benefit everyone. No one should suffer from too little when someone has excess. It's a pretty basic tenet of progressive belief.
People on the right vote like they don't believe in society at all. They vote like everyone should fend for themselves and fuck the rest. Then they complain when their government benefits get cut and the prices get too high because it wasn't supposed to be them that got fucked. They weren't supposed to be the "rest."
I don't think they understand that progressive policies are intended to help the most racist piece-of-shit MAGA fuckwits as much as anyone else. They only want to have it better than someone, ANYONE else, so they aren't at the bottom rung.
The problem is unrestricted, unregulated capitalism. Get rid of the top 20 billionaires and others will take their place, just as bad or maybe worse. Regulation goes a long way to addressing many of the problems we are seeing in our world today. Is it the only solution? Definitely not, but having had most regulation gutted (started in the 80s and just getting more hamstrung from there) has escalated the problem immensely. Reintroducing strong business regulation is a good start because, contrary to what a lot of you all are hoping for, most folks aren't ready to seize the means of production and make a wholesale change to a socialist utopia.
Says the godless adulterer criminal pedophile thief warmonger-in-chief. At least the godless communists care more about the people of this country than what they can squeeze out of the people of this country .
Possibly. There are branded products that she is allergic to and she's not allergic to the generic, but it tends to be the generics using the ingredient she can't have.
My point is that the generalizations are MOSTLY true, but there can be exceptions. People who discount all generics out of hand are usually just blowhards.
My daughter has an anaphylactic reaction to an inactive ingredient that is present in some generic products but not others. We have to be very aware of what company makes the generics she takes to make sure exactly what they contain. That's why I say most people can take them and not everyone. Some medications will harm her more than help because of an inactive ingredient.
I don't know if you are in the US, but AB-rated generic equivalents are determined to have a release profile that is within an acceptable range of variance from the reference product to still be considered equivalent. I'm not saying that all diltiazem products are equivalent because obviously Cardizem injection is not the same as Cardizem CD is not the same as Cardizem LA is not the same as Cardizem regular tablet. What I'm saying is that Cardizem CD 240 mg capsules and all of the AB rated equivalents a pharmacy would substitute for it may have some subtle differences, but in general they don't matter clinically for patients.
The active ingredients are exactly the same. The inactive ingredients may differ and there may be some slight differences in bioavailability that for most people are not significant. There is no reason that the vast majority of people can't take a generic equivalent of a branded medication. That said, there are sometimes exceptions that need to be considered on a cases-by-case basis. Anyone who says "I can't take generic medications" is full of shit.
Are you taking up arms for the coming revolution then?
I just have a hard time believing they can keep him both alive and sufficiently lucid enough to be viable for 2028. He's struggling to hold it together through an entire Nazi rally now.
This is the shit that is put out there to keep people from being involved in politics because "why bother if both sides are the same?" and to deflect blame from the fact that the right is objectively worse in every fucking way. The Democratic party has a lot of problems and is in need of of a huge pull to the left, but it is better than the alternative. Dismissing it this way solves nothing.
Monopolies are a natural result of laissez-faire economics. Bailouts are (gasp) socialism!
People on the left have a belief that society should benefit everyone. No one should suffer from too little when someone has excess. It's a pretty basic tenet of progressive belief.
People on the right vote like they don't believe in society at all. They vote like everyone should fend for themselves and fuck the rest. Then they complain when their government benefits get cut and the prices get too high because it wasn't supposed to be them that got fucked. They weren't supposed to be the "rest."
I don't think they understand that progressive policies are intended to help the most racist piece-of-shit MAGA fuckwits as much as anyone else. They only want to have it better than someone, ANYONE else, so they aren't at the bottom rung.
Republicans: We need more people to have babies!
Also Republicans: We need more babies to contract preventable diseases and die!
The problem is unrestricted, unregulated capitalism. Get rid of the top 20 billionaires and others will take their place, just as bad or maybe worse. Regulation goes a long way to addressing many of the problems we are seeing in our world today. Is it the only solution? Definitely not, but having had most regulation gutted (started in the 80s and just getting more hamstrung from there) has escalated the problem immensely. Reintroducing strong business regulation is a good start because, contrary to what a lot of you all are hoping for, most folks aren't ready to seize the means of production and make a wholesale change to a socialist utopia.
Thanks for posting this. This was the first link to it I found and the first to confirm that my unimportant ass is actually listed. Noice.
Republicano
Says the godless adulterer criminal pedophile thief warmonger-in-chief. At least the godless communists care more about the people of this country than what they can squeeze out of the people of this country .
I expect that there was a little kickback money in it for himself, so not for nothing
I've heard she's very concerned about things.
Break out the "Mission Accomplished" flight suit.
But the Never Trump Republican Refugees will tell you that it was THEM that realized the truth! Not the left that has been saying it all along!
Possibly. There are branded products that she is allergic to and she's not allergic to the generic, but it tends to be the generics using the ingredient she can't have.
My point is that the generalizations are MOSTLY true, but there can be exceptions. People who discount all generics out of hand are usually just blowhards.
My daughter has an anaphylactic reaction to an inactive ingredient that is present in some generic products but not others. We have to be very aware of what company makes the generics she takes to make sure exactly what they contain. That's why I say most people can take them and not everyone. Some medications will harm her more than help because of an inactive ingredient.
I don't know if you are in the US, but AB-rated generic equivalents are determined to have a release profile that is within an acceptable range of variance from the reference product to still be considered equivalent. I'm not saying that all diltiazem products are equivalent because obviously Cardizem injection is not the same as Cardizem CD is not the same as Cardizem LA is not the same as Cardizem regular tablet. What I'm saying is that Cardizem CD 240 mg capsules and all of the AB rated equivalents a pharmacy would substitute for it may have some subtle differences, but in general they don't matter clinically for patients.
The active ingredients are exactly the same. The inactive ingredients may differ and there may be some slight differences in bioavailability that for most people are not significant. There is no reason that the vast majority of people can't take a generic equivalent of a branded medication. That said, there are sometimes exceptions that need to be considered on a cases-by-case basis. Anyone who says "I can't take generic medications" is full of shit.
Source: I am a licensed pharmacist.
Yes, obviously everything wrong with the country today is the fault of the Democrats. All of it.
Or is it both sides? I mean, both sides are equally bad, right?
/s if it isn't obvious
OMG you too?