Okay. I’m convinced you’re one of these “artists” I referred to. No one defends trash that hasn’t found a way to get something from it.
Stop with the camera thing. It’s a bad argument. It’s not remotely the same thing. And every time I hear it- which is a lot because it’s The only thing the “artists” and “musicians” use to defend their trash- it makes me cringe.
It’s a shit argument. A photo, digital or otherwise is CREATING the location. It’s a copy of a thing that already exists.
AI can create entire songs complete with vocals that can fool engineered with have been in the business for their entire life. This is not remotely close to the same thing and you know it.
Go ahead and tell the AI to scout out the location, then travel to the location to shoot, wait for the optimal lighting conditions and then find the best angle and camera settings to capture that one in a million photo that your years of experience working with film and photography tools taught you.
If you can tell me honestly that an AI would do the same job, then I’m going to say you should find a new hobby.
I have heard this bogus “but what about a camera?” argument more times than I can count. And it’s always a poor argument in defense of AI.
Still not enough. Get that trash out of here.
There are people that believe this bullshit?
How many of these before it starts to matter?
I guarantee there’s an easy way to find out. But sadly, the white house doesn’t tap its own lines.
Make a little birdhouse in your soul.
Wooooooo!
Best comment on the subject right there.
Idiots tend to support one another.
In a follow-up story, Senators Capitulate to Hesgeth on attack of Iranian School.
I call it AI slop.
If you’re interested, there’s a peanut butter cookie recipe that only has three ingredients so it’s super easy:
1 cup of peanut butter
1 cup of sugar
and 1, egg.
Mix all that in a bowl, roll them into balls and bake for 10-15 min. Let cool for like a half-hour or so.
I had to threaten them with a lawsuit if they didn’t delete the account they made with my email that I never created.
Okay. I’m convinced you’re one of these “artists” I referred to. No one defends trash that hasn’t found a way to get something from it.
Stop with the camera thing. It’s a bad argument. It’s not remotely the same thing. And every time I hear it- which is a lot because it’s The only thing the “artists” and “musicians” use to defend their trash- it makes me cringe.
It’s a shit argument. A photo, digital or otherwise is CREATING the location. It’s a copy of a thing that already exists.
AI can create entire songs complete with vocals that can fool engineered with have been in the business for their entire life. This is not remotely close to the same thing and you know it.
Any HUMAN being using learned skill to capture a photo is art. Because art is something produced by a mind that strives to create it.
AI is not art because AI can’t comprehend art.
Go ahead and tell the AI to scout out the location, then travel to the location to shoot, wait for the optimal lighting conditions and then find the best angle and camera settings to capture that one in a million photo that your years of experience working with film and photography tools taught you.
If you can tell me honestly that an AI would do the same job, then I’m going to say you should find a new hobby.
I have heard this bogus “but what about a camera?” argument more times than I can count. And it’s always a poor argument in defense of AI.
Anyone that uses AI to compose music or make art is neither a musician, nor an artist- any more than I am a mathematician because I use a calculator.
It’s trash.
Good luck, Mexico. We couldn’t even get him to release his taxes.