Redjard

u/Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
70 posts · 966 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

on Smells · c/microblogmemes · 2 pts · 177d

Visually you may not notice the difference, but the air flowing around you at 200m/s as you cycle up mnt Thor will.

on Smells · c/microblogmemes · 5 pts · 178d

It's for racing cyclists. There's nothing more aero than legs and face shaved with sports shaving cream.

on Vin Gasoline · c/lemmyshitpost · 3 pts · 180d

"You know when you struggle to get a sofa through a doorway?"
Barber: "say no more"

There are a lot of binary packages now, and explicit bin versions of big ones like firefox or the kernel. Without using those an update after some months may take half a day. With them, even a weak laptop only takes a few minutes.

Gentoo doesn't want to push you into some compiled utopia, it's offering you the option of customizing or taking control where needed.
You can have your system use binary packages but then set one packet to source, download the source, modify it, write a patch, and have a package with a completely custom sourcecode modification that you can easily keep updating as normal at the cost of it now taking longer due to compiling from source.

on A heart-warming story · c/lemmyshitpost · 6 pts · 180d

That chart is overcomplicated.
There are 3 independent markers. A, B, and +.
Blood can have A or not, B or not, and + or not. When the body doesn't have the marker, it will react to the marker.

So when you have notA, and get A blood, you will have a reaction.
notA blood works for everyone, A blood only for A people. A people can take any blood, notA people only notA blood.

Now do this independently for the 3 markers. AB+ people have all markers so can take any combination. notAnotBnot+ people make blood everyone can take, since there are no markers, but they can't take any other blood with any markers.

Unfortunately we call not+ -, notAnotB O, notAB B, and AnotB A. So + we invert properly but for A and B we omit them and instead of emptystring when no marker is present we invent O, presumably for 0 markers. This obfuscates the pattern.

on Beware · c/linuxmemes · 14 pts · 181d

It used to be that there was no option at all, on any distro. You'd have the broken proprietary drivers, or the open source reverse engineered one with half the performance and unreliability in specialty features.

Since then Nvidia has shifted focus to get their drivers working properly, and there were also changes making them more open source, tho I'm not sure that'd mean the "proprietary driver" will go full foss at some point.

If op is to be believed, the proprietsry driver is already a lot more stable, so it's now a software licensing issue not an unfixable technical issue.

on Beware · c/linuxmemes · 38 pts · 181d

3 years ago this was true. Not sure if nvidia works properly with wayland even now, though at least the trend is different now

on W for Uncle Ted · c/lemmyshitpost · 18 pts · 182d

I checked a few people and found nothing, So I'll take that as 1 guilty and everyone else innocent then.

on W for Uncle Ted · c/lemmyshitpost · 10 pts · 182d

Do you have a list of innocents and guilties, preferably with some notes as to why for guilty ones? Or maybe a link to your mentioned comment?

on W for Uncle Ted · c/lemmyshitpost · 54 pts · 182d

One case mentioned further up is David Gelernter, who survived with permanent injuries and shows up in the Epstein files to the point of it now ending his career.

This is however well after the attacks, the Unabomber predates the timespan we have significant information about. Given the wiki entry of that David Gelernter, I wouldn't be surprised if he shows up in some analog Epstein documents we don't yet know about.

I checked another random victim and found no info at all at a glance though, so I'm not convinced on the unabomber picking targets based on this, which seems like what some others here are claiming. Could just be a by-chance hit. If you bomb people you dislike I suppose you'll have an increased chance of targetting pedos by intuition.

on Wrong CakeDay. · c/summit · 6 pts · 184d

It's showing the next future yearly repeat of your cake day. Take a look at my account for example, it'll say 2023 but in 100 days.

It reads confusingly if you don't know what to expect ig

on J'accuse! · c/NiceMemes · 1 pts · 184d

Could be a few probing taps before declaring the ground unstable and icky and not worth the heat.

Say two front paws, a backtrack, some contemplation then another single paw attempt. This also matches the shallower third print.

If there were more pixels to the images maybe more could be said.