I'm not OP, but I also don't have an internal monologue (and I don't dream, but I can construct images in my head "on demand"). I was in my late 20s before I realized that an internal monologue was not a literary device used by authors when telling a story - and people have an internal voice.
Think of it this way: unless something is causing sound externally there is absolute silence. It's peaceful sure, but your aware of all the little noises of things around you. One thing that can be hellish is getting a song stuck in your head ( I know several 3/4 and 5/4 melodies for just this reason).
Please do not eat food served via a 3d printed tool/plate/bowl/cup. A number of the materials that are used for 3d printing are toxic (cross contamination is likely even if the material has been changed), and the plastic can contain small abrasion which are impossible to sanitize.
It depends on your goal. If it's to learn (to say get a different job) you want/need as much flexibility as you can get. If it's just to have a media server then you probably want to optimize in favor of that.
Think of this like any specialty skill. It's hard the first time but will quickly become second nature. But first you have some homework...
If you have a way to section off your network and understand how to expose service's to the web you are off to a great start from the networking side.
For the ssl cert. As others have mentioned it's time to go read up on how DNS works. You don't need to go super technical (yet, if ever) - but getting you head around DNS delegation and registers will answer all the questions you have here. The super TLDR is you "buy" a domain and tell your register where they can tell others to find the records for that domain. Once you can prove you own the domain you can get certs. There are a bunch of options going this path, I'm most familiar with the enterprise grade choices (aka super expensive) so am not the best to recommend something for someone starting out.
Now for VMs. I'm sorry to say it's homework time. You have three primary choices: everything in a full VM, everything in containers or a mix. If your interested in having a GUI (learn the cli when your comfortable) then I'm going to recommend you look at two different technologies: proxmox (it's overkill but might be what you want) or virt-manager.
I'm gonna echo some of the other people here. While I don't debug code for fun (thank you to everyone who does), I represent the security/operations side of the house (eventually you'll learn to love or hate people like me). If you don't understand what your writing, the odds of it getting shipped in my environment are zero.
Now some honest advice. Stop the project, and put on your learning hat. You need to learn some basic fundamentals. If you are good at self study something like learnpythonthehardway.org might be a good jumping off pont.
Once the fundamentals are out of the way, all projects follow a similar trend: start with a desired goal, break that down into components, repeat breaking down components til you have discreet tasks, understand your dependency tree, and start tackling the tasks.
Let's be frank. The boss probably does not even know what a log is, let alone that people can pull it.
One of the more important lessons learned from a career in and around IT: no one holds a grudge like senior, non manager IT staff. And they turn up in the strangest meetings/locations. Hence the warning of "be careful".
Be careful. IT with good CYA has logs. If they are really good at CYA, the logs have logs.
They might be a terrible IT, but they might be good at CYA (or friends with security, who makes good IT CYA look like chump change).
So I grew up 95% vegetarian. Stir fry can be adapted to fit just about anyone's taste, and is dead simple to make (and filling).
The first thing your going to want to learn is how to cook rice. This might be in a pot, rice cooker, or something else. Find what works for you.
Now with your rice cooking, do a hard pan fry of some tofu. Your goal is to get it crispy via the highest heat your stove can put out (think wok levels if you can). The trick is to use a firm (or extra firm) tofu that has been patted dry and cut into small cubes, oil and a lot of heat. From here add in a few veggies that you like and top with a basic teriyaki sauce.
That's a basic stir fry on rice. Mix the rice into the pan and you start down the road of fried rice.
I'm digging up old memories, but anything released in the early 2000s should fit the bill. Skimming track lists for something I recognize, invincible or Alien Youth are jumping out at me.
Cobol. We have experienced this problem happening organically with Cobol developers. The worlds financial infrastructure runs on Cobol and anyone who had skills in this language can pick the company they want to work at.
So let's talk about the Anthropic models, cause that's what I'm playing with on the company dime.
Wire up a few mcp configs (don't even start me on the inherent risks associated with current MCP permissions model...) and give it a run book and it's great at generating reports for me about stuff I kinda care about.
Could if replace an entry level grad? Sure. Will that company have all kinds of strange problems - hell yes. Think of it as an intern. You can give it all the crappy intern tasks while you make coffee. Only the intern improves when you give feedback...
I'll be honest. If it was me 7-10 years ago I would do it. Current me however gives away 3d printers to people (first one is free...) that don't fit my current needs. So for the next FDM printer it's probably going to be a Prusa Core One.
What's amazing is it was fast. Like I was playing with my mk3s when they where first a thing, and now I'm thinking of retiring it for a core xy and bamboo has done the entire story arc.
Going to war against Iran promised to change the Middle East by weakening a villainous regime and thwarting its nuclear ambitions. To its most bullish supporters, the war would also change the world by cowing an ascendant China. It would show how America’s control over the flow of oil leaves China vulnerable. And it would boost deterrence by contrasting America’s military supremacy with China’s reluctance or inability to save its friends.A month into the fighting, this logic still seems misguided and hubristic. Certainly, that is the way it looks from Beijing. The Economist has been speaking to diplomats, advisers, scholars, experts and current and former officials in China. Almost all of them see the war as a grave American error. China has stood aside, they say, because its leaders understand the maxim attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte, supposedly uttered as his foes were abandoning high ground at Austerlitz: “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.”
Many Chinese say the war will accelerate America’s decline. They see American aggression as a validation of President Xi Jinping’s focus on security over economic growth. And they expect peace, when it comes, to create opportunities for China to exploit. Only in the background is there anxiety—and the hint of a possible Chinese miscalculation.First, the view in Beijing is that America is lashing out at Iran because it feels its power ebbing. Like Britain in the 19th century, its formidable display of military force contrasts with its lack of purpose or restraint. President Donald Trump has spurned the advice of experts. He has issued wild threats and, as this was published, was about to address the nation amid talk of pulling out. His lack of a strategy has set America up for failure.Chinese experts hope the war will amplify talk of decline. Mr Trump’s musings about a ground operation are a sign of how easily one ill-considered step can lead to the next. If Iran falls into chaos or the regime clings on, America may spend years fighting fires in the Middle East. If Iran seeks nuclear weapons, Uncle Sam may go to war yet again.All that would distract America from East Asia where, if China has its way, the 21st century will be shaped. This war will also worry countries that depend on America. Not only has their ally become less reliable, but they are paying for its hot-headedness in expensive energy and raw materials. Will Asian countries therefore become more wary of offending China?Second, Chinese officials think the war shows the wisdom of Mr Xi’s emphasis on fostering self-reliance in technology and commodities, even when those efforts have come at the expense of economic growth (which remains stubbornly and wastefully below its potential). Mr Xi has strived to protect China from chokepoints being closed. He has created a 1.3bn-barrel strategic reserve of crude oil, enough for several months. He has diversified power-generation to nuclear, solar and wind while maintaining the use of domestically mined coal. China is being characteristically pragmatic, by facilitating Iran’s oil trade.Mr Xi has also invested in chokepoints of his own as a deterrent against America. Last year, after Mr Trump escalated tariffs, he threatened to restrict supplies of rare earths, vital for electronics and green tech. Although this leverage will fade as America finds alternative sources, Mr Xi is already seeking new pressure points, including vital pharmaceutical molecules, some chips and logistics. He wants China to dominate new technologies, such as quantum computing and robotics.Last, the war will create opportunities. The Gulf countries and Iran will tender lucrative rebuilding contracts. Many countries worried about future embargoes in the Strait of Hormuz will want to buy Chinese green technology, including gear from solar, wind and battery producers—all of which have overcapacity. Whereas America blows hot and cold, China’s brand of cynical self-interest is at least dependable.China also thinks it can exploit America. Weakened in Iran, Mr Trump may be easier to negotiate with. At his summit with Mr Xi in Beijing in May, China hopes to lay the ground for a deal that will curb America’s use of tariffs and export controls and possibly create a framework for Chinese investment in America. Ideally for China, Mr Trump will say that America opposes Taiwanese independence and supports peaceful unification—a shift from the studied ambiguity of Henry Kissinger’s original formulation.Yet China’s optimism is tempered by anxiety. Experts are taken aback by how the American armed forces are using artificial intelligence to co-ordinate operations. That is one more reason for dismissing the idea that Mr Xi is impatient to invade Taiwan. As Iran has shown, war is unpredictable. And if America is declining, war will be unnecessary. Other worries are economic. If war drags on, the harm to China and its exports will mount, even if other countries suffer more.For all China’s hard-headed analysis, it has one strategic blind spot. Chinese thinkers are too reluctant to contemplate a scenario in which America acts as a rogue power, ripping up the world order it created. Although China likes to complain about Western values, it has thrived under rules that America has laboured to sustain.An unstable planet would be uncomfortable for China. Global disorder would undermine its export-fuelled growth, a worry for a party whose legitimacy rests on prosperity, iron-fisted order and Chinese exceptionalism.That scenario may well accompany America’s decline. But not necessarily. Faced with technological and political change, America has repeatedly shown a remarkable ability to reinvent itself. By contrast, China is cautious, ageing and hidebound by party ideology. So far, whenever America does not provide global security it has been loth to step in.China is putting a lot of weight on the assumption that America will fail to thrive amid the anarchy it is creating. There is a future in which America embraces upheaval and China shuts itself off. That future may belong to America.
People conflate security with risk mitigation. It's not secure in the way that you can confirm the data has been deleted. The risk however is mitigated due to vendor attestations reinforced by contracts.
I will always remember the CS class I took that was taught in Lisp (it was the only class in that program that used Lisp).
It convinced me I did not want to do software engineering for my career.
I'm not OP, but I also don't have an internal monologue (and I don't dream, but I can construct images in my head "on demand"). I was in my late 20s before I realized that an internal monologue was not a literary device used by authors when telling a story - and people have an internal voice.
Think of it this way: unless something is causing sound externally there is absolute silence. It's peaceful sure, but your aware of all the little noises of things around you. One thing that can be hellish is getting a song stuck in your head ( I know several 3/4 and 5/4 melodies for just this reason).
Please do not eat food served via a 3d printed tool/plate/bowl/cup. A number of the materials that are used for 3d printing are toxic (cross contamination is likely even if the material has been changed), and the plastic can contain small abrasion which are impossible to sanitize.
It depends on your goal. If it's to learn (to say get a different job) you want/need as much flexibility as you can get. If it's just to have a media server then you probably want to optimize in favor of that.
Think of this like any specialty skill. It's hard the first time but will quickly become second nature. But first you have some homework...
If you have a way to section off your network and understand how to expose service's to the web you are off to a great start from the networking side.
For the ssl cert. As others have mentioned it's time to go read up on how DNS works. You don't need to go super technical (yet, if ever) - but getting you head around DNS delegation and registers will answer all the questions you have here. The super TLDR is you "buy" a domain and tell your register where they can tell others to find the records for that domain. Once you can prove you own the domain you can get certs. There are a bunch of options going this path, I'm most familiar with the enterprise grade choices (aka super expensive) so am not the best to recommend something for someone starting out.
Now for VMs. I'm sorry to say it's homework time. You have three primary choices: everything in a full VM, everything in containers or a mix. If your interested in having a GUI (learn the cli when your comfortable) then I'm going to recommend you look at two different technologies: proxmox (it's overkill but might be what you want) or virt-manager.
Well. That's one reaction.
I wish you best of luck. Some advice not related to your project - soft skills are as important (if not more in some instances) then hard skills.
I'm gonna echo some of the other people here. While I don't debug code for fun (thank you to everyone who does), I represent the security/operations side of the house (eventually you'll learn to love or hate people like me). If you don't understand what your writing, the odds of it getting shipped in my environment are zero.
Now some honest advice. Stop the project, and put on your learning hat. You need to learn some basic fundamentals. If you are good at self study something like learnpythonthehardway.org might be a good jumping off pont.
Once the fundamentals are out of the way, all projects follow a similar trend: start with a desired goal, break that down into components, repeat breaking down components til you have discreet tasks, understand your dependency tree, and start tackling the tasks.
Let's be frank. The boss probably does not even know what a log is, let alone that people can pull it.
One of the more important lessons learned from a career in and around IT: no one holds a grudge like senior, non manager IT staff. And they turn up in the strangest meetings/locations. Hence the warning of "be careful".
Be careful. IT with good CYA has logs. If they are really good at CYA, the logs have logs. They might be a terrible IT, but they might be good at CYA (or friends with security, who makes good IT CYA look like chump change).
Does the grandma prompt still work?
So I grew up 95% vegetarian. Stir fry can be adapted to fit just about anyone's taste, and is dead simple to make (and filling).
The first thing your going to want to learn is how to cook rice. This might be in a pot, rice cooker, or something else. Find what works for you.
Now with your rice cooking, do a hard pan fry of some tofu. Your goal is to get it crispy via the highest heat your stove can put out (think wok levels if you can). The trick is to use a firm (or extra firm) tofu that has been patted dry and cut into small cubes, oil and a lot of heat. From here add in a few veggies that you like and top with a basic teriyaki sauce.
That's a basic stir fry on rice. Mix the rice into the pan and you start down the road of fried rice.
Totally reasonable.
I'm digging up old memories, but anything released in the early 2000s should fit the bill. Skimming track lists for something I recognize, invincible or Alien Youth are jumping out at me.
Honestly, just pull up a smattering of the top songs. I don't think you need to do a whole album to get the vibe -- 2 - 4 songs should do it.
Cobol. We have experienced this problem happening organically with Cobol developers. The worlds financial infrastructure runs on Cobol and anyone who had skills in this language can pick the company they want to work at.
So let's talk about the Anthropic models, cause that's what I'm playing with on the company dime.
Wire up a few mcp configs (don't even start me on the inherent risks associated with current MCP permissions model...) and give it a run book and it's great at generating reports for me about stuff I kinda care about.
Could if replace an entry level grad? Sure. Will that company have all kinds of strange problems - hell yes. Think of it as an intern. You can give it all the crappy intern tasks while you make coffee. Only the intern improves when you give feedback...
I'll be honest. If it was me 7-10 years ago I would do it. Current me however gives away 3d printers to people (first one is free...) that don't fit my current needs. So for the next FDM printer it's probably going to be a Prusa Core One.
What's amazing is it was fast. Like I was playing with my mk3s when they where first a thing, and now I'm thinking of retiring it for a core xy and bamboo has done the entire story arc.
Going to war against Iran promised to change the Middle East by weakening a villainous regime and thwarting its nuclear ambitions. To its most bullish supporters, the war would also change the world by cowing an ascendant China. It would show how America’s control over the flow of oil leaves China vulnerable. And it would boost deterrence by contrasting America’s military supremacy with China’s reluctance or inability to save its friends.A month into the fighting, this logic still seems misguided and hubristic. Certainly, that is the way it looks from Beijing. The Economist has been speaking to diplomats, advisers, scholars, experts and current and former officials in China. Almost all of them see the war as a grave American error. China has stood aside, they say, because its leaders understand the maxim attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte, supposedly uttered as his foes were abandoning high ground at Austerlitz: “Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake.” Many Chinese say the war will accelerate America’s decline. They see American aggression as a validation of President Xi Jinping’s focus on security over economic growth. And they expect peace, when it comes, to create opportunities for China to exploit. Only in the background is there anxiety—and the hint of a possible Chinese miscalculation.First, the view in Beijing is that America is lashing out at Iran because it feels its power ebbing. Like Britain in the 19th century, its formidable display of military force contrasts with its lack of purpose or restraint. President Donald Trump has spurned the advice of experts. He has issued wild threats and, as this was published, was about to address the nation amid talk of pulling out. His lack of a strategy has set America up for failure.Chinese experts hope the war will amplify talk of decline. Mr Trump’s musings about a ground operation are a sign of how easily one ill-considered step can lead to the next. If Iran falls into chaos or the regime clings on, America may spend years fighting fires in the Middle East. If Iran seeks nuclear weapons, Uncle Sam may go to war yet again.All that would distract America from East Asia where, if China has its way, the 21st century will be shaped. This war will also worry countries that depend on America. Not only has their ally become less reliable, but they are paying for its hot-headedness in expensive energy and raw materials. Will Asian countries therefore become more wary of offending China?Second, Chinese officials think the war shows the wisdom of Mr Xi’s emphasis on fostering self-reliance in technology and commodities, even when those efforts have come at the expense of economic growth (which remains stubbornly and wastefully below its potential). Mr Xi has strived to protect China from chokepoints being closed. He has created a 1.3bn-barrel strategic reserve of crude oil, enough for several months. He has diversified power-generation to nuclear, solar and wind while maintaining the use of domestically mined coal. China is being characteristically pragmatic, by facilitating Iran’s oil trade.Mr Xi has also invested in chokepoints of his own as a deterrent against America. Last year, after Mr Trump escalated tariffs, he threatened to restrict supplies of rare earths, vital for electronics and green tech. Although this leverage will fade as America finds alternative sources, Mr Xi is already seeking new pressure points, including vital pharmaceutical molecules, some chips and logistics. He wants China to dominate new technologies, such as quantum computing and robotics.Last, the war will create opportunities. The Gulf countries and Iran will tender lucrative rebuilding contracts. Many countries worried about future embargoes in the Strait of Hormuz will want to buy Chinese green technology, including gear from solar, wind and battery producers—all of which have overcapacity. Whereas America blows hot and cold, China’s brand of cynical self-interest is at least dependable.China also thinks it can exploit America. Weakened in Iran, Mr Trump may be easier to negotiate with. At his summit with Mr Xi in Beijing in May, China hopes to lay the ground for a deal that will curb America’s use of tariffs and export controls and possibly create a framework for Chinese investment in America. Ideally for China, Mr Trump will say that America opposes Taiwanese independence and supports peaceful unification—a shift from the studied ambiguity of Henry Kissinger’s original formulation.Yet China’s optimism is tempered by anxiety. Experts are taken aback by how the American armed forces are using artificial intelligence to co-ordinate operations. That is one more reason for dismissing the idea that Mr Xi is impatient to invade Taiwan. As Iran has shown, war is unpredictable. And if America is declining, war will be unnecessary. Other worries are economic. If war drags on, the harm to China and its exports will mount, even if other countries suffer more.For all China’s hard-headed analysis, it has one strategic blind spot. Chinese thinkers are too reluctant to contemplate a scenario in which America acts as a rogue power, ripping up the world order it created. Although China likes to complain about Western values, it has thrived under rules that America has laboured to sustain.An unstable planet would be uncomfortable for China. Global disorder would undermine its export-fuelled growth, a worry for a party whose legitimacy rests on prosperity, iron-fisted order and Chinese exceptionalism.That scenario may well accompany America’s decline. But not necessarily. Faced with technological and political change, America has repeatedly shown a remarkable ability to reinvent itself. By contrast, China is cautious, ageing and hidebound by party ideology. So far, whenever America does not provide global security it has been loth to step in.China is putting a lot of weight on the assumption that America will fail to thrive amid the anarchy it is creating. There is a future in which America embraces upheaval and China shuts itself off. That future may belong to America.
People conflate security with risk mitigation. It's not secure in the way that you can confirm the data has been deleted. The risk however is mitigated due to vendor attestations reinforced by contracts.
That would be the "modern" version. At some point it changed from "Super User Do" to "Switch User Do".
Or Wikipedia is wrong. Which can happen.