Their countries of origin gain more by focusing resources on young elephants that are still capable of eventually joining a herd and perpetuating the species.
The Moroccan government weaponized its own population's hope for a better future against Spain, likely due to territorial disputes between the two countries and Pedro Sanchez's recent diplomatic visit to Algeria.
The scale of this operation, combined with the online campaign and the fact that it coincided with a Moroccan national holiday, seems to point to a covert attempt at hybrid warfare by the state, rather than a case of human trafficking networks.
And instead of showing solidarity, certain European leaders (especially in Italy, but also in Denmark and elsewhere) decided to exploit the situation for political campaigning. Quite sad.
Nothing but opportunists all across Europe (and especially in Italy). Instead of uniting against what is obviously an act of aggression by Morocco against Spain, they attack the Spanish government and exaggerate the situation with the aim of benefiting their respective parties at home (The Schengen area is not at stake, for those who don't know geography, Ceuta is in Africa, it's isolated. Heck! It isn't even part of the Schengen area in the first place).
There are many things for which it is fair to criticize Sanchez, but this is not one of them.
I would be in favour of banning the use of the crucifix in public too. Not because I think it's a dangerous object, but because I believe religion should remain at home or in a place specifically designated for that purpose.
I am in favour of banning the burqa, but I think it's particularly funny that the guys who are supposedly all about individual freedom (iniciativa liberal, despite the name they are much closer to libertarians) at least in their propaganda voted in favour of banning face-covering in public (which is what the law actually refers to, because in Portugal, for the time being, it is unconstitutional to ban a specific religious item).
As I state right at the beginning: it depends on the context. Most of the time that’s not the case, sure, but it’s still gross.
Pee against a tree is unhygienic and it can damage the tree's bark, just ask my Japanese maples. Some people can be such pigs, they come across a beautiful, unfenced garden by the roadside, and some incontinent types immediately think about going there to take a leak.
Taking care of elderly elephants is expensive.
Their countries of origin gain more by focusing resources on young elephants that are still capable of eventually joining a herd and perpetuating the species.
The Moroccan government weaponized its own population's hope for a better future against Spain, likely due to territorial disputes between the two countries and Pedro Sanchez's recent diplomatic visit to Algeria.
The scale of this operation, combined with the online campaign and the fact that it coincided with a Moroccan national holiday, seems to point to a covert attempt at hybrid warfare by the state, rather than a case of human trafficking networks.
And instead of showing solidarity, certain European leaders (especially in Italy, but also in Denmark and elsewhere) decided to exploit the situation for political campaigning. Quite sad.
Nothing but opportunists all across Europe (and especially in Italy). Instead of uniting against what is obviously an act of aggression by Morocco against Spain, they attack the Spanish government and exaggerate the situation with the aim of benefiting their respective parties at home (The Schengen area is not at stake, for those who don't know geography, Ceuta is in Africa, it's isolated. Heck! It isn't even part of the Schengen area in the first place).
There are many things for which it is fair to criticize Sanchez, but this is not one of them.
Happiness isn't allowed to be in a capitalist society.
Humanity needs to continue to collectivise, even our brains should be collectivised through a brain-computer-brain network.
True.
I suspect many wanted a kleptocracy but hoped to share in the plunder.
He's a fascist painted with a faded red star, but even the Nazi flag used a bit of red. For the well informed, it's actually a classic.
Unsurprisingly, the more money you accumulate, the greater your capacity to extend your tentacles into a vast network. Anyone else would do the same.
No, because there is no economic incentive to do so.
The world is losing its fun. 😔
I would be in favour of banning the use of the crucifix in public too. Not because I think it's a dangerous object, but because I believe religion should remain at home or in a place specifically designated for that purpose.
I am in favour of banning the burqa, but I think it's particularly funny that the guys who are supposedly all about individual freedom (iniciativa liberal, despite the name they are much closer to libertarians) at least in their propaganda voted in favour of banning face-covering in public (which is what the law actually refers to, because in Portugal, for the time being, it is unconstitutional to ban a specific religious item).
It will always be like that.
Sad to see that most European countries continue to act like vassal states.
It would help people who enjoy reading the news stay informed about what is happening in detail.
It will not be difficult to dismantle the EU, one need only observe the trends among the electorate in Germany and France.
The UK should never rejoin until it abolishes its first past the post system.
As I state right at the beginning: it depends on the context. Most of the time that’s not the case, sure, but it’s still gross.
Pee against a tree is unhygienic and it can damage the tree's bark, just ask my Japanese maples. Some people can be such pigs, they come across a beautiful, unfenced garden by the roadside, and some incontinent types immediately think about going there to take a leak.
I didn't say that. But depending on the context, it could at least be considered exhibitionism and therefore sexual harassment.