TxTechnician

u/TxTechnician@lemmy.ml
13 posts · 70 comments

Recent posts

Recent comments

You'd have to be a registered party member to vote. Most voters are not registered party members.

Like me, I don't like either party. And always vote for the lesser of the two evils. So this next election I'm voting for James talrico in the primary. Which means I'm voting Democrat.

The goal is to lock down their current maga politicians. Before midterms.

Because a large part of the USA is pissed about their reps sniffing trumps ass.

Answer the question directly. Do not return any
preamble, explanation, or reasoning.
Chain-of-Thought
Think step by step to answer the following question.
Return the answer at the end of the response after a
separator ####.
Chain-of-Draft
Think step by step, but only keep a minimum draft for
each thinking step, with 5 words at most. Return the
answer at the end of the response after a separator
 ####.

Thats interesting. Good tip.

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2502.18600

Labels allow expedient understanding of a philosophy, concept, belief system, etc. They're not pointless.

I need to clarify what I mean by this.

In the context of what I am thinking about the use of labels, I mean whenever people use labels to describe their out group, they use them as a dismissive tool.

For example, if you are not 100% pro-Trump and you say anything negative about Trump or his administration to somebody who has died in the wool, they will call you a liberal.

It has gotten to the point where anything that you say will get you labeled as woke or a liberal. So long as it is something that goes against magga and Christian nationalism.

Therefore, the political term liberal is all but meaningless.

Because it doesn't hold a unified definition across the aisles.

Besides this, political labels as a whole are mostly bullshit because people use them to describe themselves as being part of a group. But whenever you question them as an individual, you find out that they don't align with a lot of the shit that other people who use that political label ascribe to.

Similar to the first point 'Christian' is just the family name, I think what you're trying to describe are 'Christian nationalists', with emphasis on nationalist.

OK that's right. I suppose it's better to describe them as Christian nationalist rather than giving up the word.

But that doesn't dissuade from the fact that Christian now has a horrible smell about it.

It was such a stupid idea.

Time and time again, we have shown that humans want something that they can actively interact with in order to manipulate it.

Hence why I am sitting here talking to my keyboard on a phone that I can touch, rather than just conversing with a smart audio speaker to type this message out.