Even if you do, it's hard to tell if it'll be legitimate human interaction or just someone using AI.
AI has infiltrated everything. There is a pen pal app that acts in a similar way to snail mail. You get a limited number of stamps and send letters to people that take the approximate time to reach the other user based on how far apart you are irl. A couple of years ago the app became infested with people using AI to write their letters.
People have become incredibly lazy in every regard. I'd rather be a recluse than bother trying to chat with a society that has to use AI to speak on their behalf.
It's an aggressive mix of the gish gallop and motte and bailey fallacies.
They won't even own their own viewpoints once you've gone through the effort of pulling apart the claim and addressing it. They'll tell you that you're reading too deep into it, misinterpreting it, all while putting out more nonsense for you to address.
There's nothing you can do with the average person not being invested enough in politics to inquire further, and the lack of controls on public speakers. Except stoop to their level I suppose.
As I've grown older I have felt regret about not stepping into a mentor role like this. I genuinely don't think I'm the person to do it, nor do I consider myself capable.
I don't believe in any religion, don't like religion, but I also realize that it's not the governments place to tell people what they can and can't believe.
Besides that, given the specifics of this law it's rather easy to see it's not even about religion as a whole. It's just more Islamophobia.
I try to laugh because it helps with how depressing life is, but sometimes I'm just overwhelmed by it all. Sometimes I need to close my eyes and ignore it.
Nah, was a lot actually. I know a lot of people that were really upset after the election and after the first few months. Then it stopped being a problem. "You're overreacting." "Don't think about it." "We'll be fine next election."
Nah, I know what nice guys are. I just more so meant I didn't understand these people.
I don't know about others, but I tend to look at how someone treats others as insight on how they'll treat me. If someone is openly malicious to other people for such petty reasons then they'll treat you the same way.
I never understood this specific example. Why are people so obsessed with someone that's already spoken for? It shows such a lack of respect for boundaries.
I've run into the type of guy that thinks it's alright to harass someone because they're in a relationship with someone they're interested in, and what makes me sad is how so many see nothing wrong with it.
I get the need for privacy given how many people have a habit of stalking or digging through post history for malicious purposes, but it also removes a lot of accountability. Accountability is equally as important, given that people turn into monsters without it.
This point of view seems to be what a lot of evangelicals fall back on whenever you somehow manage to score any points against their orange god.
I've heard several of them admit that, "Oh well, the world world is awful, and it's fine if it ends." Who gives them the right to make that decision for the rest of us?
Maduro was democratically elected and supported by the majority.
Forgive my ignorance, but didn't Maduro ban opposition party leaders from campaigning against him?
I'm not saying or agreeing with the orange man, what he did was wrong. It's not our place to intervene in other countries, but this is what I've heard everywhere.
How about all the times I’ve seen MAGA people make threats like that and worse?
Yeah, my own half brother threatened to shoot me for voting against his orange god. My parents regularly would post about how anyone who disagreed with Trump deserved death.
Oh very meow, I'll put the cat ears back on.
I enjoy the cleaning. It gives me purpose and makes me feel useful.
You could ask far, far worse of me.
Even if you do, it's hard to tell if it'll be legitimate human interaction or just someone using AI.
AI has infiltrated everything. There is a pen pal app that acts in a similar way to snail mail. You get a limited number of stamps and send letters to people that take the approximate time to reach the other user based on how far apart you are irl. A couple of years ago the app became infested with people using AI to write their letters.
People have become incredibly lazy in every regard. I'd rather be a recluse than bother trying to chat with a society that has to use AI to speak on their behalf.
Shadow of the colossus my beloved.
It's an aggressive mix of the gish gallop and motte and bailey fallacies.
They won't even own their own viewpoints once you've gone through the effort of pulling apart the claim and addressing it. They'll tell you that you're reading too deep into it, misinterpreting it, all while putting out more nonsense for you to address.
There's nothing you can do with the average person not being invested enough in politics to inquire further, and the lack of controls on public speakers. Except stoop to their level I suppose.
Someone actually gets it. Like every other sexual act it is an act of trust.
I'm not sure about that. In general I do feel as if I don't contribute nearly enough to society in order to make it a better place.
As I've grown older I have felt regret about not stepping into a mentor role like this. I genuinely don't think I'm the person to do it, nor do I consider myself capable.
I don't believe in any religion, don't like religion, but I also realize that it's not the governments place to tell people what they can and can't believe.
Besides that, given the specifics of this law it's rather easy to see it's not even about religion as a whole. It's just more Islamophobia.
Thanks friend.
I try to laugh because it helps with how depressing life is, but sometimes I'm just overwhelmed by it all. Sometimes I need to close my eyes and ignore it.
Nah, was a lot actually. I know a lot of people that were really upset after the election and after the first few months. Then it stopped being a problem. "You're overreacting." "Don't think about it." "We'll be fine next election."
You wouldn't do this to your cat. Or your dog. Or any other pet. Why should they have to go through it?
Nah, I know what nice guys are. I just more so meant I didn't understand these people.
I don't know about others, but I tend to look at how someone treats others as insight on how they'll treat me. If someone is openly malicious to other people for such petty reasons then they'll treat you the same way.
I never understood this specific example. Why are people so obsessed with someone that's already spoken for? It shows such a lack of respect for boundaries.
I've run into the type of guy that thinks it's alright to harass someone because they're in a relationship with someone they're interested in, and what makes me sad is how so many see nothing wrong with it.
I get the need for privacy given how many people have a habit of stalking or digging through post history for malicious purposes, but it also removes a lot of accountability. Accountability is equally as important, given that people turn into monsters without it.
Not even close to being untrue. I've listened to a lot of conservatives being anti-sidewalks growing up, complaining how sidewalks aided criminals.
This point of view seems to be what a lot of evangelicals fall back on whenever you somehow manage to score any points against their orange god.
I've heard several of them admit that, "Oh well, the world world is awful, and it's fine if it ends." Who gives them the right to make that decision for the rest of us?
Forgive my ignorance, but didn't Maduro ban opposition party leaders from campaigning against him?
I'm not saying or agreeing with the orange man, what he did was wrong. It's not our place to intervene in other countries, but this is what I've heard everywhere.
Yeah, my own half brother threatened to shoot me for voting against his orange god. My parents regularly would post about how anyone who disagreed with Trump deserved death.
But these are rules for others, not for them.